{"title":"The association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury in primiparous women: A propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Omri Dominsky, Emmanuel Attali, Uri Amikam, Ronen Gold, Chaim Greenberger, Yariv Yogev, Yoav Baruch","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury, including obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), in primiparous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women with singleton, term, vertex, and vaginal deliveries between 2012 and 2024 at a tertiary medical center. Primary outcomes were (1) any perineal injury, and (2) OASI. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to adjust for maternal and obstetric confounders. Perineal outcomes were compared in matched and unmatched cohorts using standardized mean difference (SMD). An SMD <0.1 was considered negligible, 0.1-0.2 small, and >0.2 clinically significant. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between epidural use and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 45 132 women were included, of whom 36 799 (81.5%) received epidural analgesia. After matching (n = 5974 per group), baseline characteristics were balanced apart from fetal head station at full dilation, which was higher in the no-epidural group (0.90 ± 0.9 vs. 0.66 ± 0.8; SMD = 0.239). Perineal injury occurred more often with epidural with a marginal difference (82.2% vs. 78.2%, SMD = 0.10). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, epidural was associated with more perineal injury only in the absence of episiotomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.321; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.225-1.425; P < 0.001), but not when episiotomy was performed. Conversely, epidural use was associated with lower OASI risk regardless of whether episiotomy was performed (aOR 0.492; 95% CI: 0.285-0.849; P = 0.011) or not (aOR 0.592; 95% CI: 0.424-0.825; P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In primiparous term vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia modestly increased low-grade perineal tears but reduced OASI risk, supporting its safety regarding severe perineal trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury, including obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), in primiparous women.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women with singleton, term, vertex, and vaginal deliveries between 2012 and 2024 at a tertiary medical center. Primary outcomes were (1) any perineal injury, and (2) OASI. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to adjust for maternal and obstetric confounders. Perineal outcomes were compared in matched and unmatched cohorts using standardized mean difference (SMD). An SMD <0.1 was considered negligible, 0.1-0.2 small, and >0.2 clinically significant. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between epidural use and outcomes.
Results: Overall, 45 132 women were included, of whom 36 799 (81.5%) received epidural analgesia. After matching (n = 5974 per group), baseline characteristics were balanced apart from fetal head station at full dilation, which was higher in the no-epidural group (0.90 ± 0.9 vs. 0.66 ± 0.8; SMD = 0.239). Perineal injury occurred more often with epidural with a marginal difference (82.2% vs. 78.2%, SMD = 0.10). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, epidural was associated with more perineal injury only in the absence of episiotomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.321; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.225-1.425; P < 0.001), but not when episiotomy was performed. Conversely, epidural use was associated with lower OASI risk regardless of whether episiotomy was performed (aOR 0.492; 95% CI: 0.285-0.849; P = 0.011) or not (aOR 0.592; 95% CI: 0.424-0.825; P = 0.002).
Conclusion: In primiparous term vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia modestly increased low-grade perineal tears but reduced OASI risk, supporting its safety regarding severe perineal trauma.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.