Comparative Effectiveness of Combination Therapy with Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir and Molnupiravir versus Monotherapy with Molnupiravir or Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients: A Target Trial Emulation Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Ming Hong Choi, Boyuan Wang, Yahui Xu, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Esther Wai Yin Chan, Wing Ming Chu, Anthony Raymond Tam, Kwok Yung Yuen, Ivan Fan Ngai Hung
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Combination Therapy with Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir and Molnupiravir versus Monotherapy with Molnupiravir or Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients: A Target Trial Emulation Study.","authors":"Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Ming Hong Choi, Boyuan Wang, Yahui Xu, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Esther Wai Yin Chan, Wing Ming Chu, Anthony Raymond Tam, Kwok Yung Yuen, Ivan Fan Ngai Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir have demonstrated efficacy in reducing hospitalisation and mortality among unvaccinated, high-risk COVID-19 outpatients. However, their impact on hospitalised adults remains unclear. Preclinical studies suggest that combining these antivirals may reduce viral shedding and enhance survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This target trial emulation study compared the safety and efficacy of combined molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus monotherapy in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Hong Kong. Data from 28,355 patients aged 18 and older, treated within five days of hospital admission between March 16, 2022, and March 31, 2024, were analysed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics and outcomes, including mortality, ICU admission, and ventilatory support, which were analysed using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir monotherapy significantly reduced mortality risk (HR: 0.62; 95% CI 0.50-0.77; ARR: -3.16%) compared to combination therapy, with no differences in ICU admission or ventilatory support. It also lowered risks of acute liver injury (HR: 0.53 [95% CI 0.32-0.88]), kidney injury (HR: 0.61 [95% CI 0.51-0.74]), and hyperglycaemia (HR: 0.73 [95% CI 0.57-0.93]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir does not significantly reduce mortality, ICU admissions, or ventilatory support needs in hospitalised COVID-19 adults. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir monotherapy is more effective, but further randomised controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Health & Medical Research Fund Commissioned Research on COVID-19 (COVID1903010, COVID1903011; COVID19F01).</p>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"108097"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir have demonstrated efficacy in reducing hospitalisation and mortality among unvaccinated, high-risk COVID-19 outpatients. However, their impact on hospitalised adults remains unclear. Preclinical studies suggest that combining these antivirals may reduce viral shedding and enhance survival.

Methods: This target trial emulation study compared the safety and efficacy of combined molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus monotherapy in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Hong Kong. Data from 28,355 patients aged 18 and older, treated within five days of hospital admission between March 16, 2022, and March 31, 2024, were analysed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics and outcomes, including mortality, ICU admission, and ventilatory support, which were analysed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir monotherapy significantly reduced mortality risk (HR: 0.62; 95% CI 0.50-0.77; ARR: -3.16%) compared to combination therapy, with no differences in ICU admission or ventilatory support. It also lowered risks of acute liver injury (HR: 0.53 [95% CI 0.32-0.88]), kidney injury (HR: 0.61 [95% CI 0.51-0.74]), and hyperglycaemia (HR: 0.73 [95% CI 0.57-0.93]).

Conclusion: Combining nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir does not significantly reduce mortality, ICU admissions, or ventilatory support needs in hospitalised COVID-19 adults. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir monotherapy is more effective, but further randomised controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Funding: The Health & Medical Research Fund Commissioned Research on COVID-19 (COVID1903010, COVID1903011; COVID19F01).

尼马特利韦-利托那韦和莫硝匹拉韦联合治疗住院COVID-19患者与莫硝匹拉韦或尼马特利韦-利托那韦单药治疗的疗效比较:一项目标试验模拟研究
背景:莫努匹拉韦和尼马特利韦-利托那韦在未接种疫苗的高危COVID-19门诊患者中显示出降低住院率和死亡率的疗效。然而,它们对住院成年人的影响尚不清楚。临床前研究表明,联合使用这些抗病毒药物可以减少病毒脱落,提高生存率。方法:本目标试验模拟研究比较了莫努匹拉韦联合尼马特利韦-利托那韦与单药治疗在香港住院的COVID-19患者中的安全性和有效性。研究人员分析了2022年3月16日至2024年3月31日期间入院5天内接受治疗的28,355名18岁及以上患者的数据。使用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来平衡基线特征和结果,包括死亡率、ICU入院率和呼吸支持,并使用Cox比例风险模型进行分析。结果:与联合治疗相比,尼马特利韦-利托那韦单药治疗显著降低了死亡风险(HR: 0.62; 95% CI 0.50-0.77; ARR: -3.16%),在ICU住院或呼吸支持方面无差异。它还降低了急性肝损伤(风险比:0.53 [95% CI 0.32-0.88])、肾损伤(风险比:0.61 [95% CI 0.51-0.74])和高血糖(风险比:0.73 [95% CI 0.57-0.93])的风险。结论:尼马特利韦-利托那韦与莫那匹韦联合使用并不能显著降低COVID-19住院成人的死亡率、ICU入院率或呼吸支持需求。尼马特韦-利托那韦单药治疗更有效,但需要进一步的随机对照试验来证实这些发现。资助:卫生与医学研究基金委托研究COVID-19 (covid - 1903010, covid - 1903011; covid - 19f01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信