Stress Urinary Incontinence Procedure Outcomes in the < 40-Year-Old Population: A Multicenter Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ashley Huber, Hoa Nguyen, Nicole Meckes, Sujatha Narayanamoorthy, Lauren Tholemeier, Ravi Patel, Gabriella Rustia, Margot Le Neveu, Madeline Coulter, Alexander DelVlahos, Zachary Selzler, Nicholas Scioscia, Trieu Do, Jared Floch, K Marie Douglass, Lisbet Lundsberg, Nancy Ringel
{"title":"Stress Urinary Incontinence Procedure Outcomes in the < 40-Year-Old Population: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Ashley Huber, Hoa Nguyen, Nicole Meckes, Sujatha Narayanamoorthy, Lauren Tholemeier, Ravi Patel, Gabriella Rustia, Margot Le Neveu, Madeline Coulter, Alexander DelVlahos, Zachary Selzler, Nicholas Scioscia, Trieu Do, Jared Floch, K Marie Douglass, Lisbet Lundsberg, Nancy Ringel","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06289-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common problem affecting the quality of life of many women, but treatment outcomes in younger women are sparsely reported. We sought to evaluate SUI procedure outcomes in women < 40 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of women < 40 years old who underwent a primary SUI procedure between January 1, 2020 and July 1, 2023. We compared outcomes and complication rates of midurethral slings to periurethral bulking with polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG). Data was extracted by manual chart review and analyzed using descriptive statistics, comparative statistics with chi-square or Fisher exact tests, or the Wilcoxon two sample test for continuous measurements. The primary outcome was report of cure or improvement in SUI symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen study sites were included, with individual IRB approvals obtained at each site. A total of 377 women < 40 years old were identified who underwent a primary SUI procedure during the study period; 40 underwent periurethral bulking with PAHG and 337 underwent sling (307 (91%) retropubic, 13 (4%) transobturator, 17 (5%) single incision). Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Reported rates for cure or improved symptoms were 88.6% (n = 31/35) for PAHG and 97.8% (n = 315/324) for slings (p = 0.0156) at 4 weeks and 81.8% (n = 9/11) for PAGH and 92.9% (n = 66/71) for slings at approximately 1 year postoperative (p = 0.131). Complication rates were low in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women < 40 years old who received periurethral bulking with PAHG for treatment of SUI had lower rates of cure/improvement at short-term follow-up in their SUI compared to those who received a sling.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06289-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common problem affecting the quality of life of many women, but treatment outcomes in younger women are sparsely reported. We sought to evaluate SUI procedure outcomes in women < 40 years old.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of women < 40 years old who underwent a primary SUI procedure between January 1, 2020 and July 1, 2023. We compared outcomes and complication rates of midurethral slings to periurethral bulking with polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG). Data was extracted by manual chart review and analyzed using descriptive statistics, comparative statistics with chi-square or Fisher exact tests, or the Wilcoxon two sample test for continuous measurements. The primary outcome was report of cure or improvement in SUI symptoms.

Results: Fifteen study sites were included, with individual IRB approvals obtained at each site. A total of 377 women < 40 years old were identified who underwent a primary SUI procedure during the study period; 40 underwent periurethral bulking with PAHG and 337 underwent sling (307 (91%) retropubic, 13 (4%) transobturator, 17 (5%) single incision). Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Reported rates for cure or improved symptoms were 88.6% (n = 31/35) for PAHG and 97.8% (n = 315/324) for slings (p = 0.0156) at 4 weeks and 81.8% (n = 9/11) for PAGH and 92.9% (n = 66/71) for slings at approximately 1 year postoperative (p = 0.131). Complication rates were low in both groups.

Conclusions: Women < 40 years old who received periurethral bulking with PAHG for treatment of SUI had lower rates of cure/improvement at short-term follow-up in their SUI compared to those who received a sling.

40岁以下人群压力性尿失禁手术结果:一项多中心研究
目的:压力性尿失禁(SUI)是影响许多女性生活质量的常见问题,但年轻女性的治疗结果很少报道。我们试图评估40岁以下女性SUI手术的结果。方法:我们对2020年1月1日至2023年7月1日期间接受原发性SUI手术的< 40岁女性进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。我们比较了聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶(PAHG)和尿道中吊带的结果和并发症发生率。通过手工图表审查提取数据,并使用描述性统计、卡方或Fisher精确检验的比较统计或连续测量的Wilcoxon双样本检验进行分析。主要结局是报告SUI症状的治愈或改善。结果:纳入了15个研究地点,每个地点都获得了单独的IRB批准。在研究期间,共有377名< 40岁的女性接受了原发性SUI手术;40例行PAHG尿道周围填塞术,337例行吊带术(耻骨后307例(91%),经闭口13例(4%),单切口17例(5%))。各组之间的基线人口统计数据相似。据报道,4周时PAHG的治愈或症状改善率为88.6% (n = 31/35),吊带的治愈或症状改善率为97.8% (n = 315/324) (p = 0.0156),术后约1年时PAGH的治愈或症状改善率为81.8% (n = 9/11),吊带的治愈或症状改善率为92.9% (n = 66/71) (p = 0.131)。两组并发症发生率均较低。结论:在短期随访中,< 40岁的女性接受PAHG尿道周围填充术治疗SUI的治愈率/改良率较接受吊带的患者低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信