Disparities associated with race and ethnicity in pain management: a scoping review.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
D Patterson, C McGuinness, S Dunne, C Ibechukwu Kane, L R Wogu, J Hayden, J Strawbridge
{"title":"Disparities associated with race and ethnicity in pain management: a scoping review.","authors":"D Patterson, C McGuinness, S Dunne, C Ibechukwu Kane, L R Wogu, J Hayden, J Strawbridge","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-02008-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health inequalities can occur where there are differences in how people are treated with respect to their race and ethnicity. Disparities and systemic inequities in healthcare have led to negative outcomes. Pain management is an area where there are perceived health inequalities. Medicines optimisation is a framework for healthcare provider interventions under four principles to ensure that medicines are used safely and effectively, producing the best possible outcomes for patients. Using this framework allows a systematic and theory-informed identification of areas of care at risk of disparities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to assess disparities associated with race and ethnicity in pain management, mapped to the medicines optimisation framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Electronic databases CINAHL, Ovid and Medline were searched from 2012 to 2025. Studies involving pain management, medicine optimisation, ethnicity, ethnic minorities and race were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. Data were extracted on evidence relating to the application of the four principles of medicines optimisation, and for the presence or absence of disparities in pain management overall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine (75%) identified pain management disparities in respect to race and ethnicity, with the majority of disparities related to medicine optimisation principle 2 (evidenced based medicine). Disparities identified were discrepancies in the reporting of pain scores, time to pain and pain assessment and discrepancies in the receipt of opioids across all races. Other disparities were, inconsistencies with prescriptions issued at discharge or outpatients, patients' dissatisfaction with pain management. There were less disparities observed in studies that involved children, when managing surgical pain and pain in palliative care and when protocols were used in the management of pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities in pain management associated with patient race and ethnicity are prevalent have decreased over the past decade. Healthcare professionals should seek to understand the patient experience and incorporate protocols/guidelines into their care to promote evidence-based medicine. Further research in wider geographies is required, particularly in medication safety and incorporating medicines optimisation into routine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-02008-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health inequalities can occur where there are differences in how people are treated with respect to their race and ethnicity. Disparities and systemic inequities in healthcare have led to negative outcomes. Pain management is an area where there are perceived health inequalities. Medicines optimisation is a framework for healthcare provider interventions under four principles to ensure that medicines are used safely and effectively, producing the best possible outcomes for patients. Using this framework allows a systematic and theory-informed identification of areas of care at risk of disparities.

Aim: The aim was to assess disparities associated with race and ethnicity in pain management, mapped to the medicines optimisation framework.

Method: Electronic databases CINAHL, Ovid and Medline were searched from 2012 to 2025. Studies involving pain management, medicine optimisation, ethnicity, ethnic minorities and race were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. Data were extracted on evidence relating to the application of the four principles of medicines optimisation, and for the presence or absence of disparities in pain management overall.

Results: One hundred and eighteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine (75%) identified pain management disparities in respect to race and ethnicity, with the majority of disparities related to medicine optimisation principle 2 (evidenced based medicine). Disparities identified were discrepancies in the reporting of pain scores, time to pain and pain assessment and discrepancies in the receipt of opioids across all races. Other disparities were, inconsistencies with prescriptions issued at discharge or outpatients, patients' dissatisfaction with pain management. There were less disparities observed in studies that involved children, when managing surgical pain and pain in palliative care and when protocols were used in the management of pain.

Conclusion: Disparities in pain management associated with patient race and ethnicity are prevalent have decreased over the past decade. Healthcare professionals should seek to understand the patient experience and incorporate protocols/guidelines into their care to promote evidence-based medicine. Further research in wider geographies is required, particularly in medication safety and incorporating medicines optimisation into routine care.

疼痛管理中与种族和民族相关的差异:范围回顾。
导言:如果人们的种族和族裔待遇不同,就会出现保健不平等现象。医疗保健方面的差异和系统性不平等导致了负面结果。疼痛管理是人们认为存在健康不平等的一个领域。药物优化是医疗保健提供者根据四项原则进行干预的框架,以确保安全有效地使用药物,为患者产生最佳可能结果。使用这一框架可以系统地、有理论依据地确定存在差异风险的护理领域。目的:目的是评估种族和民族在疼痛管理方面的差异,并将其映射到药物优化框架中。方法:检索2012 ~ 2025年的电子数据库CINAHL、Ovid和Medline。研究涉及疼痛管理、药物优化、民族、少数民族和种族。两位审稿人独立筛选标题、摘要和全文。数据提取的证据有关的应用药物优化的四个原则,并为存在或不存在差异的疼痛管理总体。结果:118项研究符合纳入标准。89人(75%)确定了种族和民族方面的疼痛管理差异,其中大多数差异与药物优化原则2(循证医学)有关。发现的差异是所有种族的疼痛评分、疼痛时间和疼痛评估报告的差异,以及阿片类药物的接收差异。其他差异是,出院时或门诊时开具的处方不一致,患者对疼痛管理的不满。在涉及儿童的研究中,在处理手术疼痛和姑息治疗中的疼痛以及在处理疼痛时使用协议时,观察到的差异较小。结论:在过去的十年中,与患者种族和民族相关的疼痛管理差异普遍减少。医疗保健专业人员应设法了解患者的经验,并将协议/指南纳入他们的护理中,以促进循证医学。需要在更广泛的地区进行进一步的研究,特别是在药物安全和将药物优化纳入常规护理方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信