Nomogram for estimating the risk of suicide attempts in major depressive disorder: integrating demographic, clinical and biochemical markers - a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1634164
Nan Lyu, Qian Zhao, Rina Dutta, Han Wang, Gang Wang, Allan H Young
{"title":"Nomogram for estimating the risk of suicide attempts in major depressive disorder: integrating demographic, clinical and biochemical markers - a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Nan Lyu, Qian Zhao, Rina Dutta, Han Wang, Gang Wang, Allan H Young","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1634164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant risk factor for suicide attempts (SA), making early identification of those most at risk crucial for effective clinical intervention. This study aimed to identify demographic, clinical, and biochemical correlates of SA among inpatients with MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, data were collected from 968 inpatients diagnosed with MDD, including 392 with documented suicide attempts (MDD-SA) and 576 without suicidal behaviors (MDD-NSA). Demographic characteristics, clinical history, and peripheral biochemical markers were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression to assess associations with SA. Variable selection was performed using penalized logistic regression with 10-fold cross-validation, and the selected variables were then entered into a binary logistic regression model to illustrate the relative contribution of significant factors. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were found between MDD-S and MDD-N in marital status (42.3% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.004), alcohol consumption (15.82% vs. 8.85%, p < 0.001), tobacco use (20.67% vs. 13.73%, p = 0.004), education level (p < 0.001), life events (79.59% vs. 65.28%, p < 0.001), and folate levels (p < 0.001). MDD-S patients were more likely to undergo modified electroconvulsive therapy (61.73% vs. 39.41%, p < 0.001) and mood stabilizers (26.02% vs. 18.92%, p = 0.009). The nomogram incorporated tobacco use, alcohol consumption, education level, life events, and folate levels, showing good discrimination (C-index = 0.709, bootstrap = 0.703). ROC analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.709 (95% CI: 0.677-0.742), and DCA confirmed clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several routinely available variables, including tobacco use, alcohol consumption, education level, life events, and folate level, were associated with suicide attempts in MDD inpatients. Our findings highlight these important correlates, which may help clinicians in recognizing patients at elevated risk. The nomogram provided in this study should be regarded only as a visualization to better illustrate the contribution of these factors, rather than as a clinical assessment tool. Prospective multicenter studies are needed for further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1634164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1634164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant risk factor for suicide attempts (SA), making early identification of those most at risk crucial for effective clinical intervention. This study aimed to identify demographic, clinical, and biochemical correlates of SA among inpatients with MDD.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data were collected from 968 inpatients diagnosed with MDD, including 392 with documented suicide attempts (MDD-SA) and 576 without suicidal behaviors (MDD-NSA). Demographic characteristics, clinical history, and peripheral biochemical markers were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression to assess associations with SA. Variable selection was performed using penalized logistic regression with 10-fold cross-validation, and the selected variables were then entered into a binary logistic regression model to illustrate the relative contribution of significant factors. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: Significant differences were found between MDD-S and MDD-N in marital status (42.3% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.004), alcohol consumption (15.82% vs. 8.85%, p < 0.001), tobacco use (20.67% vs. 13.73%, p = 0.004), education level (p < 0.001), life events (79.59% vs. 65.28%, p < 0.001), and folate levels (p < 0.001). MDD-S patients were more likely to undergo modified electroconvulsive therapy (61.73% vs. 39.41%, p < 0.001) and mood stabilizers (26.02% vs. 18.92%, p = 0.009). The nomogram incorporated tobacco use, alcohol consumption, education level, life events, and folate levels, showing good discrimination (C-index = 0.709, bootstrap = 0.703). ROC analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.709 (95% CI: 0.677-0.742), and DCA confirmed clinical utility.

Conclusion: Several routinely available variables, including tobacco use, alcohol consumption, education level, life events, and folate level, were associated with suicide attempts in MDD inpatients. Our findings highlight these important correlates, which may help clinicians in recognizing patients at elevated risk. The nomogram provided in this study should be regarded only as a visualization to better illustrate the contribution of these factors, rather than as a clinical assessment tool. Prospective multicenter studies are needed for further validation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

估计重度抑郁症患者自杀企图风险的Nomogram:整合人口统计学、临床和生化标记——一项横断面研究。
背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)是自杀企图(SA)的重要危险因素,因此早期识别那些最危险的人对于有效的临床干预至关重要。本研究旨在确定MDD住院患者中SA的人口学、临床和生化相关性。方法:在本横断面研究中,收集了968例诊断为重度抑郁症的住院患者的数据,其中392例有自杀企图(MDD- sa), 576例无自杀行为(MDD- nsa)。采用多变量logistic回归分析人口统计学特征、临床病史和外周血生化指标,以评估与SA的相关性。采用10倍交叉验证的惩罚逻辑回归进行变量选择,然后将选择的变量输入二元逻辑回归模型,以说明显著因素的相对贡献。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积、校正图和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估模型的性能。结果:MDD-S组和MDD-N组在婚姻状况(42.3% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.004)、饮酒(15.82% vs. 8.85%, p < 0.001)、吸烟(20.67% vs. 13.73%, p = 0.004)、受教育程度(p < 0.001)、生活事件(79.59% vs. 65.28%, p < 0.001)和叶酸水平(p < 0.001)方面存在显著差异。MDD-S患者更有可能接受改良电休克治疗(61.73% vs. 39.41%, p < 0.001)和情绪稳定剂(26.02% vs. 18.92%, p = 0.009)。nomogram包括吸烟、饮酒、受教育程度、生活事件和叶酸水平,具有良好的辨别性(C-index = 0.709, bootstrap = 0.703)。ROC分析显示AUC为0.709 (95% CI: 0.677-0.742), DCA证实了临床应用。结论:几个常规可用的变量,包括吸烟、饮酒、教育水平、生活事件和叶酸水平,与MDD住院患者的自杀企图有关。我们的研究结果强调了这些重要的相关性,这可能有助于临床医生识别高危患者。本研究中提供的nomogram (nomogram)图只能作为更好地说明这些因素作用的可视化图,而不能作为临床评估工具。需要前瞻性多中心研究来进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信