In Vitro Enhanced Bonding of Silane-Modified Adhesive Systems in Fiber Post Cementation.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-09-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/5593764
Thais Pantoja de França, João Victor Frazão Câmara, Leonardo Queiroz Athias, Renata Antoun Simão, Maíra Prado
{"title":"In Vitro Enhanced Bonding of Silane-Modified Adhesive Systems in Fiber Post Cementation.","authors":"Thais Pantoja de França, João Victor Frazão Câmara, Leonardo Queiroz Athias, Renata Antoun Simão, Maíra Prado","doi":"10.1155/ijod/5593764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the effect of applying silane prior to the adhesive with an adhesive containing silane in its composition in the cementation of fiber posts to conventional resin cement. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In total 20 fiber posts were divided into two groups: silane/adhesive (G1): application of silane, followed by the application of the adhesive; and adhesive with silane (G2): application of adhesive containing silane in its composition. The test specimens were obtained from cylinders of AllCem Core resin cement, with the fiber postpositioned in the center of its long axis. The post/cement assembly was sectioned, and evaluated for bond strength (BS) by pushout test, and fracture pattern was analyzed with a stereoscopic microscope. <b>Results:</b> No significant difference in BS was observed between G1 (silane + adhesive) and G2 (adhesive containing silane). For fracture patterns, Type 3 (cohesive post and cement) was the most observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of an adhesive containing silane, as per the adopted protocol, did not compromise BS when fiber posts were cemented with Allcem CORE cement. Both techniques exhibited similar results, with minor differences in fracture patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5593764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/5593764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of applying silane prior to the adhesive with an adhesive containing silane in its composition in the cementation of fiber posts to conventional resin cement. Materials and Methods: In total 20 fiber posts were divided into two groups: silane/adhesive (G1): application of silane, followed by the application of the adhesive; and adhesive with silane (G2): application of adhesive containing silane in its composition. The test specimens were obtained from cylinders of AllCem Core resin cement, with the fiber postpositioned in the center of its long axis. The post/cement assembly was sectioned, and evaluated for bond strength (BS) by pushout test, and fracture pattern was analyzed with a stereoscopic microscope. Results: No significant difference in BS was observed between G1 (silane + adhesive) and G2 (adhesive containing silane). For fracture patterns, Type 3 (cohesive post and cement) was the most observed. Conclusions: The use of an adhesive containing silane, as per the adopted protocol, did not compromise BS when fiber posts were cemented with Allcem CORE cement. Both techniques exhibited similar results, with minor differences in fracture patterns.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

硅烷改性胶粘剂体系在纤维桩胶结中的体外增强粘合。
目的:比较含硅烷胶粘剂在纤维桩胶结中和常规树脂胶结中的应用效果。材料与方法:将20根纤维桩分为两组:硅烷/胶粘剂组(G1):先涂硅烷,再涂胶粘剂;含硅烷粘合剂(G2):在其组成中含有硅烷的粘合剂的应用。试样取自AllCem Core树脂水泥圆柱体,纤维后置在其长轴的中心。对柱/水泥组件进行了切片,通过推出测试评估了粘结强度(BS),并用立体显微镜分析了断裂模式。结果:G1(硅烷+胶粘剂)与G2(含硅烷胶粘剂)的BS无显著性差异。对于断裂模式,3型(粘结桩和水泥)最为常见。结论:使用含有硅烷的粘合剂,按照采用的方案,当用Allcem CORE水泥粘合纤维桩时,不会损害BS。两种技术都显示出相似的结果,只是骨折模式有微小的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信