New instrument for effective detection of a history of COPD exacerbations, including usually unreported events.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1630338
Jaromir Zatloukal, Eva Volakova, Jana Kovacikova, Martina Kulirova, Miroslav Maruscak, Blanka Hytychova, Vladimir Koblizek
{"title":"New instrument for effective detection of a history of COPD exacerbations, including usually unreported events.","authors":"Jaromir Zatloukal, Eva Volakova, Jana Kovacikova, Martina Kulirova, Miroslav Maruscak, Blanka Hytychova, Vladimir Koblizek","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1630338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD exacerbations are important events for disease management. The incidence of exacerbations impacts prognosis, guides treatment, and predicts future exacerbations. Despite their importance, exacerbations are often underdiagnosed and underreported. The aim of our study was to test and evaluate the effectiveness of a structured checklist for detecting past exacerbations that we developed and that would be suitable for routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>350 patients with COPD and FEV<sub>1</sub> < 80% of the predicted value were enrolled in 35 centers. Each patient completed a structured checklist and underwent an interview with the physician. The number of exacerbations, their symptoms and duration, and the treatments were evaluated. Clinical data on exacerbations in the previous 12 months were retrieved from the patient's medical records and analyzed retrospectively. The data obtained using the structured checklist were compared with the data from the interviews and medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the patient-physician interview, the structured checklist detected more exacerbations since the previous visit (<i>p</i> = 0.025). The difference was significant also for severe exacerbations (<i>p</i> = 0.003). In patients reporting only one event, the structured checklist was more sensitive in detecting mild events than the interview (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The structured checklist detected mild exacerbations in 10 patients in whom the interview detected none. Compared to the number of exacerbations in the medical records, the structured checklist detected more than twice as many events. The mean duration of an exacerbation was 9.7 days, and the most prominent symptoms were dyspnea and productive cough.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proposed structured checklist improved the detection of past exacerbations, including usually unreported events. Moreover, the structured checklist allows the severity and other clinical characteristics of past exacerbations to be specified and used to direct further COPD therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1630338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1630338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COPD exacerbations are important events for disease management. The incidence of exacerbations impacts prognosis, guides treatment, and predicts future exacerbations. Despite their importance, exacerbations are often underdiagnosed and underreported. The aim of our study was to test and evaluate the effectiveness of a structured checklist for detecting past exacerbations that we developed and that would be suitable for routine clinical practice.

Methods: 350 patients with COPD and FEV1 < 80% of the predicted value were enrolled in 35 centers. Each patient completed a structured checklist and underwent an interview with the physician. The number of exacerbations, their symptoms and duration, and the treatments were evaluated. Clinical data on exacerbations in the previous 12 months were retrieved from the patient's medical records and analyzed retrospectively. The data obtained using the structured checklist were compared with the data from the interviews and medical records.

Results: Compared to the patient-physician interview, the structured checklist detected more exacerbations since the previous visit (p = 0.025). The difference was significant also for severe exacerbations (p = 0.003). In patients reporting only one event, the structured checklist was more sensitive in detecting mild events than the interview (p < 0.001). The structured checklist detected mild exacerbations in 10 patients in whom the interview detected none. Compared to the number of exacerbations in the medical records, the structured checklist detected more than twice as many events. The mean duration of an exacerbation was 9.7 days, and the most prominent symptoms were dyspnea and productive cough.

Conclusion: Proposed structured checklist improved the detection of past exacerbations, including usually unreported events. Moreover, the structured checklist allows the severity and other clinical characteristics of past exacerbations to be specified and used to direct further COPD therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于有效检测COPD加重史的新仪器,包括通常未报告的事件。
背景:COPD恶化是疾病管理的重要事件。恶化的发生率影响预后,指导治疗,并预测未来的恶化。尽管它们很重要,但恶化往往未得到充分诊断和报告。我们研究的目的是测试和评估结构化检查表的有效性,以检测我们开发的过去的恶化,这将适用于常规临床实践。方法:350例COPD患者和FEV1 结果:与患者-医生访谈相比,结构化检查表发现自上次就诊以来有更多的加重(p = 0.025)。在严重恶化时差异也显著(p = 0.003)。在仅报告一个事件的患者中,结构化检查表在检测轻度事件方面比面谈更敏感(p 结论:提出的结构化检查表提高了对过去加重的检测,包括通常未报告的事件。此外,结构化的检查表允许指定过去加重的严重程度和其他临床特征,并用于指导进一步的COPD治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信