Effect of the thumbtack needle on gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer with the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Shuai Guo, Xiang-Ping Lin, Xiang-Ren Jin, Kang-Xiu Tuo, Pei Li, Wei-Wei Yang, Qian Wang
{"title":"Effect of the thumbtack needle on gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer with the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Shuai Guo, Xiang-Ping Lin, Xiang-Ren Jin, Kang-Xiu Tuo, Pei Li, Wei-Wei Yang, Qian Wang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1612766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of thumbtack needle therapy on GI function recovery after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. Both groups received perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery management. Participants in the treatment group received thumbtack needle therapy at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Shangjuxu (ST37), Hegu (LI4), and Sanyinjiao (SP6). Primary outcomes included the time to bowel sound recovery and time to first flatus (all measured in hours). Secondary outcomes included the time to first defecation, time to removal of the nasogastric tube and intra-abdominal drains (all measured in hours), postoperative pain scores, nausea and vomiting scores, abdominal distension scores (all measured in points), length of hospital stay (days), incidence of complications (%), safety evaluation, and overall response rate (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 participants were screened, and 80 were enrolled (40 per group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with the control group, the treatment group showed significantly shorter times to bowel sound recovery (difference, -4.0 h, 95% CI: -7.0 to -1.0, <i>P</i> = 0.010), first flatus (-11.0 h, 95% CI: -19.0 to -2.0, <i>P</i> = 0.017), first defecation (-8.0 h, 95% CI: -16.0 to -1.0, <i>P</i> = 0.026), nasogastric tube removal (-12.0 h, 95% CI: -27.0 to -2.0 <i>P</i> = 0.023), and intra-abdominal drain removal (-10.0 h, 95% CI: -21.0 to -1.0, <i>P</i> = 0.038). Pain scores were significantly lower in the treatment group on postoperative day (POD) 1 (-1, 95% CI: -1 to 0, <i>P</i> = 0.031), POD 2 (-1, 95% CI: -2 to -1, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and POD 3 (-1, 95% CI: -2 to 0, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Similar improvements were observed in nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension scores on POD 1-3 (all showing a median difference of -1, all <i>P</i> < 0.05). The treatment group also had a significantly shorter hospital stay (difference, -1.7 days, 95% CI: -3.0 to -0.3, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.015). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (difference, -5.0%, 95% CI: -18.6 to 8.0, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.396), and no adverse reactions occurred in the treatment group. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the treatment group (difference, 17.5%, 95% CI: 0.18-34.0, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thumbtack needle therapy at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Shangjuxu (ST37), Hegu (LI4), and Sanyinjiao (SP6) is a safe and effective intervention that promotes early recovery of GI function after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2400084712.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1612766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1612766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of thumbtack needle therapy on GI function recovery after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.
Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. Both groups received perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery management. Participants in the treatment group received thumbtack needle therapy at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Shangjuxu (ST37), Hegu (LI4), and Sanyinjiao (SP6). Primary outcomes included the time to bowel sound recovery and time to first flatus (all measured in hours). Secondary outcomes included the time to first defecation, time to removal of the nasogastric tube and intra-abdominal drains (all measured in hours), postoperative pain scores, nausea and vomiting scores, abdominal distension scores (all measured in points), length of hospital stay (days), incidence of complications (%), safety evaluation, and overall response rate (%).
Results: A total of 103 participants were screened, and 80 were enrolled (40 per group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with the control group, the treatment group showed significantly shorter times to bowel sound recovery (difference, -4.0 h, 95% CI: -7.0 to -1.0, P = 0.010), first flatus (-11.0 h, 95% CI: -19.0 to -2.0, P = 0.017), first defecation (-8.0 h, 95% CI: -16.0 to -1.0, P = 0.026), nasogastric tube removal (-12.0 h, 95% CI: -27.0 to -2.0 P = 0.023), and intra-abdominal drain removal (-10.0 h, 95% CI: -21.0 to -1.0, P = 0.038). Pain scores were significantly lower in the treatment group on postoperative day (POD) 1 (-1, 95% CI: -1 to 0, P = 0.031), POD 2 (-1, 95% CI: -2 to -1, P < 0.001), and POD 3 (-1, 95% CI: -2 to 0, P < 0.001). Similar improvements were observed in nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension scores on POD 1-3 (all showing a median difference of -1, all P < 0.05). The treatment group also had a significantly shorter hospital stay (difference, -1.7 days, 95% CI: -3.0 to -0.3, P= 0.015). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (difference, -5.0%, 95% CI: -18.6 to 8.0, P= 0.396), and no adverse reactions occurred in the treatment group. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the treatment group (difference, 17.5%, 95% CI: 0.18-34.0, P= 0.046).
Conclusion: Thumbtack needle therapy at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Shangjuxu (ST37), Hegu (LI4), and Sanyinjiao (SP6) is a safe and effective intervention that promotes early recovery of GI function after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.