Effect of the thumbtack needle on gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer with the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1612766
Shuai Guo, Xiang-Ping Lin, Xiang-Ren Jin, Kang-Xiu Tuo, Pei Li, Wei-Wei Yang, Qian Wang
{"title":"Effect of the thumbtack needle on gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer with the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Shuai Guo, Xiang-Ping Lin, Xiang-Ren Jin, Kang-Xiu Tuo, Pei Li, Wei-Wei Yang, Qian Wang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1612766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of thumbtack needle therapy on GI function recovery after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. Both groups received perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery management. Participants in the treatment group received thumbtack needle therapy at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Shangjuxu (ST37), Hegu (LI4), and Sanyinjiao (SP6). Primary outcomes included the time to bowel sound recovery and time to first flatus (all measured in hours). Secondary outcomes included the time to first defecation, time to removal of the nasogastric tube and intra-abdominal drains (all measured in hours), postoperative pain scores, nausea and vomiting scores, abdominal distension scores (all measured in points), length of hospital stay (days), incidence of complications (%), safety evaluation, and overall response rate (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 participants were screened, and 80 were enrolled (40 per group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with the control group, the treatment group showed significantly shorter times to bowel sound recovery (difference, -4.0 h, 95% CI: -7.0 to -1.0, <i>P</i> = 0.010), first flatus (-11.0 h, 95% CI: -19.0 to -2.0, <i>P</i> = 0.017), first defecation (-8.0 h, 95% CI: -16.0 to -1.0, <i>P</i> = 0.026), nasogastric tube removal (-12.0 h, 95% CI: -27.0 to -2.0 <i>P</i> = 0.023), and intra-abdominal drain removal (-10.0 h, 95% CI: -21.0 to -1.0, <i>P</i> = 0.038). Pain scores were significantly lower in the treatment group on postoperative day (POD) 1 (-1, 95% CI: -1 to 0, <i>P</i> = 0.031), POD 2 (-1, 95% CI: -2 to -1, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and POD 3 (-1, 95% CI: -2 to 0, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Similar improvements were observed in nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension scores on POD 1-3 (all showing a median difference of -1, all <i>P</i> < 0.05). The treatment group also had a significantly shorter hospital stay (difference, -1.7 days, 95% CI: -3.0 to -0.3, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.015). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (difference, -5.0%, 95% CI: -18.6 to 8.0, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.396), and no adverse reactions occurred in the treatment group. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the treatment group (difference, 17.5%, 95% CI: 0.18-34.0, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thumbtack needle therapy at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Shangjuxu (ST37), Hegu (LI4), and Sanyinjiao (SP6) is a safe and effective intervention that promotes early recovery of GI function after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2400084712.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1612766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1612766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of thumbtack needle therapy on GI function recovery after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. Both groups received perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery management. Participants in the treatment group received thumbtack needle therapy at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Shangjuxu (ST37), Hegu (LI4), and Sanyinjiao (SP6). Primary outcomes included the time to bowel sound recovery and time to first flatus (all measured in hours). Secondary outcomes included the time to first defecation, time to removal of the nasogastric tube and intra-abdominal drains (all measured in hours), postoperative pain scores, nausea and vomiting scores, abdominal distension scores (all measured in points), length of hospital stay (days), incidence of complications (%), safety evaluation, and overall response rate (%).

Results: A total of 103 participants were screened, and 80 were enrolled (40 per group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with the control group, the treatment group showed significantly shorter times to bowel sound recovery (difference, -4.0 h, 95% CI: -7.0 to -1.0, P = 0.010), first flatus (-11.0 h, 95% CI: -19.0 to -2.0, P = 0.017), first defecation (-8.0 h, 95% CI: -16.0 to -1.0, P = 0.026), nasogastric tube removal (-12.0 h, 95% CI: -27.0 to -2.0 P = 0.023), and intra-abdominal drain removal (-10.0 h, 95% CI: -21.0 to -1.0, P = 0.038). Pain scores were significantly lower in the treatment group on postoperative day (POD) 1 (-1, 95% CI: -1 to 0, P = 0.031), POD 2 (-1, 95% CI: -2 to -1, P < 0.001), and POD 3 (-1, 95% CI: -2 to 0, P < 0.001). Similar improvements were observed in nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension scores on POD 1-3 (all showing a median difference of -1, all P < 0.05). The treatment group also had a significantly shorter hospital stay (difference, -1.7 days, 95% CI: -3.0 to -0.3, P= 0.015). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (difference, -5.0%, 95% CI: -18.6 to 8.0, P= 0.396), and no adverse reactions occurred in the treatment group. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the treatment group (difference, 17.5%, 95% CI: 0.18-34.0, P= 0.046).

Conclusion: Thumbtack needle therapy at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), Shangjuxu (ST37), Hegu (LI4), and Sanyinjiao (SP6) is a safe and effective intervention that promotes early recovery of GI function after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2400084712.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以增强术后恢复为概念的腹腔镜胃癌根治术后,针刺对胃肠功能恢复的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:术后胃肠道功能障碍是胃癌手术患者的常见并发症。本研究旨在评价针刺治疗对腹腔镜胃癌根治术后胃肠道功能恢复的影响。方法:参与者随机分为治疗组和对照组。两组患者围手术期术后恢复均有所改善。治疗组患者在双侧内关(PC6)、足三里(ST36)、上聚绪(ST37)、合谷(LI4)、三阴交(SP6)处采用图钉针治疗。主要结局包括肠声恢复时间和首次放屁时间(均以小时计算)。次要结局包括第一次排便的时间、鼻胃管和腹腔内引流的时间(均以小时计)、术后疼痛评分、恶心和呕吐评分、腹胀评分(均以点计)、住院时间(天)、并发症发生率(%)、安全性评价和总有效率(%)。结果:共筛选103名受试者,入组80人(每组40人)。各组间基线特征相似。与对照组相比,治疗组肠音恢复时间(差异-4.0小时,95% CI: -7.0至-1.0,P = 0.010)、首次排气时间(-11.0小时,95% CI: -19.0至-2.0,P = 0.017)、首次排便时间(-8.0小时,95% CI: -16.0至-1.0,P = 0.026)、鼻胃管拔除时间(-12.0小时,95% CI: -27.0至-2.0 P = 0.023)和腹腔引流时间(-10.0小时,95% CI: -21.0至-1.0,P = 0.038)显著缩短。治疗组术后第一天疼痛评分(POD) 1 (-1, 95% CI: -1 ~ 0, P = 0.031)、POD 2 (-1, 95% CI: -2 ~ -1, P P P P = 0.015)明显低于对照组。两组术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(差异为-5.0%,95% CI: -18.6 ~ 8.0, P = 0.396),治疗组无不良反应发生。治疗组总有效率显著高于对照组(差异为17.5%,95% CI: 0.18-34.0, P = 0.046)。结论:针刺治疗双侧内关(PC6)、足三里(ST36)、上聚绪(ST37)、合谷(LI4)、三阴角(SP6)是促进腹腔镜胃癌根治术后胃肠道功能早期恢复的一种安全有效的干预措施。临床试验注册:http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2400084712。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信