The efficacy and safety of Epimedium in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1675160
Xian-Quan Zhang, Zhen-Hui Hua, Chu-Jia Huang, Hai-Yun Chen, Zong-Ren Hu, Mei-Ren Zhang, Jun Liu
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of Epimedium in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xian-Quan Zhang, Zhen-Hui Hua, Chu-Jia Huang, Hai-Yun Chen, Zong-Ren Hu, Mei-Ren Zhang, Jun Liu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1675160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary Osteoporosis (POP) is a global public health issue, and traditional medications have long-term safety concerns. Epimedium, a kidney-tonifying traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has the potential to regulate bone metabolism through multiple targets, but clinical evidence is scattered and inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Epimedium and its active components in treating POP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Computer searches were conducted in multiple domestic and international databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of Epimedium as an adjunct or alternative therapy with traditional drug treatments for POP. Literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessments were performed on eligible articles, relevant data were extracted, and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 RCTs were included, with a final inclusion of 890 cases, 448 in the experimental group and 442 in the control group. Meta-analysis suggests that the overall efficacy rate of the Epimedium group was significantly higher than that of the control group (OR = 3.80; 95% CI: 2.27,6.37; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Compared with the control group, Epimedium group's Lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) (SMD = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.61,1.70; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), Femoral neck BMD (SMD = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58,1.65; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), Distal radius BMD (SMD = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.57,1.98; <i>p</i> = 0.0004), and Metacarpal BMD (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.04,0.12; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) all showed significant improvement, with a shorter time to relief of lower back pain (MD = -11.38; 95% CI: -12.63, -10.12; <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly reduced (MD = -8.78; 95% CI: -12.80, -4.77; <0.0001), while bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) increased (MD = 6.73; 95% CI: 3.32,10.14; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Adverse reactions were low, mainly mild gastrointestinal reactions or skin allergies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epimedium can effectively improve bone density and clinical symptoms in patients with POP, with good safety, making it a potential alternative or adjunctive treatment option, but more high-quality studies are needed to verify long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1675160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1675160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary Osteoporosis (POP) is a global public health issue, and traditional medications have long-term safety concerns. Epimedium, a kidney-tonifying traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has the potential to regulate bone metabolism through multiple targets, but clinical evidence is scattered and inconclusive.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Epimedium and its active components in treating POP.

Method: Computer searches were conducted in multiple domestic and international databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of Epimedium as an adjunct or alternative therapy with traditional drug treatments for POP. Literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessments were performed on eligible articles, relevant data were extracted, and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results: A total of 10 RCTs were included, with a final inclusion of 890 cases, 448 in the experimental group and 442 in the control group. Meta-analysis suggests that the overall efficacy rate of the Epimedium group was significantly higher than that of the control group (OR = 3.80; 95% CI: 2.27,6.37; p = 0.0001). Compared with the control group, Epimedium group's Lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) (SMD = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.61,1.70; p < 0.0001), Femoral neck BMD (SMD = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58,1.65; p < 0.0001), Distal radius BMD (SMD = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.57,1.98; p = 0.0004), and Metacarpal BMD (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.04,0.12; p < 0.0001) all showed significant improvement, with a shorter time to relief of lower back pain (MD = -11.38; 95% CI: -12.63, -10.12; p < 0.00001). Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly reduced (MD = -8.78; 95% CI: -12.80, -4.77; <0.0001), while bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) increased (MD = 6.73; 95% CI: 3.32,10.14; p = 0.0001). Adverse reactions were low, mainly mild gastrointestinal reactions or skin allergies.

Conclusion: Epimedium can effectively improve bone density and clinical symptoms in patients with POP, with good safety, making it a potential alternative or adjunctive treatment option, but more high-quality studies are needed to verify long-term efficacy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

淫羊藿治疗原发性骨质疏松症的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:原发性骨质疏松症(POP)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,传统药物具有长期的安全性问题。淫羊藿是一种补肾中药,具有通过多靶点调节骨代谢的潜力,但临床证据零散且不确定。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评价淫羊藿及其有效成分治疗POP的疗效和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库等国内外多个数据库,收集比较淫羊藿作为辅助或替代疗法与传统药物治疗POP的随机对照试验(rct)。按照预先设定的纳入和排除标准筛选文献,对符合条件的文献进行质量评价,提取相关资料,使用RevMan 5.4软件进行统计分析。结果:共纳入10项rct,最终纳入890例,实验组448例,对照组442例。meta分析显示淫藿组总有效率显著高于对照组(OR = 3.80;95% CI: 2.27,6.37; p = 0.0001)。与对照组相比,淫羊藿组腰椎的骨矿物质密度(BMD) (SMD = 1.15;95%置信区间CI: 0.61, 1.70; p   = 0.0004页),和掌骨BMD (MD = 0.04;95%可信区间:0.04,0.12;p   = 0.0001页)。不良反应低,主要为轻度胃肠道反应或皮肤过敏。结论:淫羊藿能有效改善POP患者的骨密度和临床症状,且安全性好,是一种潜在的替代或辅助治疗方案,但长期疗效尚需更多高质量的研究验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信