Analysis of antimicrobial effects of a contactless, indirect cold atmospheric plasma-aerosol method for germ reduction on surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1668987
Tom Schaal, Ulrich Schmelz, Gilbert Hämmerle, Robert Fuchs, Timon Schorling, Sandra Kurras, Marc Koene, Tim Tischendorf
{"title":"Analysis of antimicrobial effects of a contactless, indirect cold atmospheric plasma-aerosol method for germ reduction on surfaces: an <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> study.","authors":"Tom Schaal, Ulrich Schmelz, Gilbert Hämmerle, Robert Fuchs, Timon Schorling, Sandra Kurras, Marc Koene, Tim Tischendorf","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1668987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cold Atmospheric Plasma-Aerosol (CAP-A) technology has emerged as a novel, contactless approach for antimicrobial treatment. This study evaluates the <i>in vivo</i> efficacy of CAP-A in reducing microbial contamination on human skin, building on obligatory <i>in vitro</i> testing. <i>In vitro</i> results demonstrated consistent 3-4.5 log unit microbial reductions across five standard organisms. <i>In vivo</i> evaluation using <i>Escherichia coli</i> revealed a mean log reduction factor of 4.77 (SD ± 0.44), exceeding the 4-log threshold considered clinically relevant. Notably, CAP-A showed comparable efficacy to an alcohol-based reference disinfection method (<i>p</i> = 0.134), without associated drawbacks such as thermal effects or ozone accumulation. Results suggest that CAP-A offers equivalent <i>in vivo</i> efficacy compared to previously documented CAP methods while minimizing tissue damage, thermal changes, and discomfort. The results underscore the potential of CAP-A as an effective and tolerable alternative to established CAP approaches, warranting further comparative research under standardized conditions. Future studies should examine both CAP and CAP-A technologies, broadening the spectrum of tested microorganisms, incorporating additional parameters, and rigorously assessing benefits and risks. This research could elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving differences in efficacy and side effect profiles, ultimately contributing to the optimization of plasma-based treatments in clinical and industrial settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1668987"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1668987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cold Atmospheric Plasma-Aerosol (CAP-A) technology has emerged as a novel, contactless approach for antimicrobial treatment. This study evaluates the in vivo efficacy of CAP-A in reducing microbial contamination on human skin, building on obligatory in vitro testing. In vitro results demonstrated consistent 3-4.5 log unit microbial reductions across five standard organisms. In vivo evaluation using Escherichia coli revealed a mean log reduction factor of 4.77 (SD ± 0.44), exceeding the 4-log threshold considered clinically relevant. Notably, CAP-A showed comparable efficacy to an alcohol-based reference disinfection method (p = 0.134), without associated drawbacks such as thermal effects or ozone accumulation. Results suggest that CAP-A offers equivalent in vivo efficacy compared to previously documented CAP methods while minimizing tissue damage, thermal changes, and discomfort. The results underscore the potential of CAP-A as an effective and tolerable alternative to established CAP approaches, warranting further comparative research under standardized conditions. Future studies should examine both CAP and CAP-A technologies, broadening the spectrum of tested microorganisms, incorporating additional parameters, and rigorously assessing benefits and risks. This research could elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving differences in efficacy and side effect profiles, ultimately contributing to the optimization of plasma-based treatments in clinical and industrial settings.

非接触、间接冷大气等离子体-气溶胶表面细菌减少方法的抗菌效果分析:体外和体内研究。
冷大气等离子体气溶胶(CAP-A)技术已成为一种新型的非接触式抗菌治疗方法。本研究在强制性体外试验的基础上,评估了CAP-A在减少人体皮肤微生物污染方面的体内功效。体外结果表明,5种标准生物的微生物减少量一致为3-4.5对数单位。使用大肠杆菌进行体内评估显示,平均对数减少因子为4.77 (SD ± 0.44),超过了被认为与临床相关的4对数阈值。值得注意的是,CAP-A显示出与基于酒精的参考消毒方法相当的效果(p = 0.134),没有热效应或臭氧积累等相关缺点。结果表明,与先前文献记载的CAP方法相比,CAP- a具有相同的体内疗效,同时最大限度地减少组织损伤、热变化和不适。结果强调了CAP- a作为现有CAP方法的有效和可容忍的替代方法的潜力,值得在标准化条件下进一步进行比较研究。未来的研究应该检查CAP和CAP- a技术,扩大测试微生物的范围,纳入额外的参数,并严格评估收益和风险。这项研究可以阐明导致疗效和副作用差异的潜在机制,最终有助于临床和工业环境中基于血浆的治疗的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信