{"title":"Levosimendan versus dobutamine in septic cardiomyopathy: a randomized clinical trial on cardiac function and safety.","authors":"Feng Zhao, Haolei Wei, Leqing Lin, Hui Wang, Zhuxian Zhang, Liang Guo","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1641604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and impact on outcomes of levosimendan compared with dobutamine in patients with septic cardiomyopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized clinical trial was conducted in patients with septic cardiomyopathy between December 2022 and March 2024. Eligible patients received either levosimendan or dobutamine in addition to standard sepsis treatments. Baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, pulse index continuous cardiac output, clinical outcomes, and adverse reactions were recorded and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 patients were analyzed, with 25 patients in each group. The mean age was 76.4 (±12.3) years, and 28 patients (56%) were male. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Following treatment, improvements were observed in both groups in left ventricular ejection fracture and levels of cardiac troponin I, B-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac index (CI), lactate, and norepinephrine infusion rate(all <i>P</i> < 0.05), with significantly greater improvements in the levosimendan group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the CI was higher in the levosimendan group compared to the dobutamine group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in other pulse index continuous cardiac output variables, laboratory tests, clinical outcomes, or adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with septic cardiomyopathy, levosimendan treatment resulted in greater improvements in cardiac function, hemodynamic stability, and tissue perfusion compared with dobutamine, without an increase in adverse reactions. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of levosimendan on clinical outcomes in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2500101261.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1641604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1641604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and impact on outcomes of levosimendan compared with dobutamine in patients with septic cardiomyopathy.
Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in patients with septic cardiomyopathy between December 2022 and March 2024. Eligible patients received either levosimendan or dobutamine in addition to standard sepsis treatments. Baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, pulse index continuous cardiac output, clinical outcomes, and adverse reactions were recorded and compared between the two groups.
Results: A total of 50 patients were analyzed, with 25 patients in each group. The mean age was 76.4 (±12.3) years, and 28 patients (56%) were male. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Following treatment, improvements were observed in both groups in left ventricular ejection fracture and levels of cardiac troponin I, B-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac index (CI), lactate, and norepinephrine infusion rate(all P < 0.05), with significantly greater improvements in the levosimendan group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the CI was higher in the levosimendan group compared to the dobutamine group (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in other pulse index continuous cardiac output variables, laboratory tests, clinical outcomes, or adverse reactions.
Conclusions: In patients with septic cardiomyopathy, levosimendan treatment resulted in greater improvements in cardiac function, hemodynamic stability, and tissue perfusion compared with dobutamine, without an increase in adverse reactions. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of levosimendan on clinical outcomes in this patient population.
目的:本研究旨在评价左西孟旦与多巴酚丁胺在脓毒性心肌病患者中的临床疗效、安全性及对预后的影响。方法:在2022年12月至2024年3月期间对脓毒性心肌病患者进行随机临床试验。除标准脓毒症治疗外,符合条件的患者接受左西孟旦或多巴酚丁胺治疗。记录并比较两组患者的基线特征、实验室参数、脉搏指数、连续心输出量、临床结局和不良反应。结果:共分析50例患者,每组25例。平均年龄76.4(±12.3)岁,男性28例(56%)。各组间基线特征具有可比性。治疗后,两组左心室射血骨折、心肌肌钙蛋白I、b型利钠肽、心脏指数(CI)、乳酸水平和去甲肾上腺素输注率均有改善(P P P P)。结论:与多巴酚丁胺相比,左西孟旦治疗脓毒性心肌病患者心功能、血流动力学稳定性和组织灌注改善更大,且不良反应未增加。需要进一步的研究来评估左西孟旦对该患者群体临床结果的长期影响。注册号:ChiCTR2500101261。
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.