PrEP-Related Medical, Structural and Institutional Mistrust among a Socioeconomically Diverse Sample of Black, Latine, Asian, and White Young Sexual Minority Men: Lived Experiences of Intersectional Inequity.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jessica Jaiswal, Marybec Griffin, Steven Meanley, Jerel M Ezell, Yahya Alnashri, Kevin Hascher, Benjamin Grin, Perry N Halkitis
{"title":"PrEP-Related Medical, Structural and Institutional Mistrust among a Socioeconomically Diverse Sample of Black, Latine, Asian, and White Young Sexual Minority Men: Lived Experiences of Intersectional Inequity.","authors":"Jessica Jaiswal, Marybec Griffin, Steven Meanley, Jerel M Ezell, Yahya Alnashri, Kevin Hascher, Benjamin Grin, Perry N Halkitis","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04882-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mistrust among marginalized populations has been shown to negatively impact health behaviors and outcomes. Young sexual minority men (YSMM) experience many health inequities, including those related to HIV. Understanding how YSMM think about and experience medical, structural, and institutional mistrust is critical to effectively promoting engagement in preventive services like pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The study recruited 43 YSMM (ages 25-27) from diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds in New York City. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from July- November 2018 and focused on sexual health, HIV-related beliefs, PrEP, and experiences with healthcare systems and providers. Three main themes were identified: (1) concerns regarding PrEP as a medication, including its perceived novelty, potential side effects, and the perceived lack of a compelling reason to take preventive medication; (2) ethical and philosophical apprehensions around perceived U.S. government-pharmaceutical collusion, and (3) PrEP and healthcare providers are not necessarily perceived as nefarious; mistrust can coexist with support for PrEP. Although most participants expressed some level of government-pharmaceutical mistrust, such mistrust did not necessarily dissuade them from supporting or even taking PrEP. While most participants did not consider healthcare providers as actors in government-pharmaceutical collusion, clinicians can play an essential role in addressing patients' concerns and building trust. Clinicians should endeavor to make space for open, non-judgmental conversations not only about sexual behavior, but also patients' experiences of discrimination and socioeconomic exclusion. Finally, structural interventions must seek to address societal and institutional inequities to undo harm and earn trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04882-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mistrust among marginalized populations has been shown to negatively impact health behaviors and outcomes. Young sexual minority men (YSMM) experience many health inequities, including those related to HIV. Understanding how YSMM think about and experience medical, structural, and institutional mistrust is critical to effectively promoting engagement in preventive services like pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The study recruited 43 YSMM (ages 25-27) from diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds in New York City. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from July- November 2018 and focused on sexual health, HIV-related beliefs, PrEP, and experiences with healthcare systems and providers. Three main themes were identified: (1) concerns regarding PrEP as a medication, including its perceived novelty, potential side effects, and the perceived lack of a compelling reason to take preventive medication; (2) ethical and philosophical apprehensions around perceived U.S. government-pharmaceutical collusion, and (3) PrEP and healthcare providers are not necessarily perceived as nefarious; mistrust can coexist with support for PrEP. Although most participants expressed some level of government-pharmaceutical mistrust, such mistrust did not necessarily dissuade them from supporting or even taking PrEP. While most participants did not consider healthcare providers as actors in government-pharmaceutical collusion, clinicians can play an essential role in addressing patients' concerns and building trust. Clinicians should endeavor to make space for open, non-judgmental conversations not only about sexual behavior, but also patients' experiences of discrimination and socioeconomic exclusion. Finally, structural interventions must seek to address societal and institutional inequities to undo harm and earn trust.

在社会经济多样化的黑人、拉丁裔、亚裔和白人年轻性少数男性样本中,与预科相关的医学、结构和制度不信任:交叉不平等的生活经历。
边缘化人群之间的不信任已被证明会对健康行为和结果产生负面影响。性少数青年男子(YSMM)经历了许多健康不平等,包括与艾滋病毒有关的不平等。了解YSMM如何思考和经历医疗、结构和制度上的不信任,对于有效促进接触前预防(PrEP)等预防服务的参与至关重要。该研究招募了43名来自纽约市不同种族、民族和社会经济背景的YSMM(25-27岁)。半结构化访谈于2018年7月至11月进行,重点是性健康、艾滋病毒相关信念、预防措施以及医疗保健系统和提供者的经验。确定了三个主要主题:(1)对PrEP作为一种药物的关注,包括其新颖性,潜在的副作用,以及缺乏服用预防性药物的令人信服的理由;(2)对美国政府与制药公司勾结的伦理和哲学担忧;(3)PrEP和医疗服务提供者不一定被认为是邪恶的;不信任可以与对PrEP的支持共存。尽管大多数参与者表达了一定程度的政府-制药公司不信任,但这种不信任并不一定会阻止他们支持甚至服用PrEP。虽然大多数参与者不认为医疗服务提供者是政府-制药公司勾结的参与者,但临床医生可以在解决患者的担忧和建立信任方面发挥重要作用。临床医生应该努力为公开、非评判性的对话腾出空间,不仅是关于性行为,还包括患者的歧视经历和社会经济排斥。最后,结构性干预必须寻求解决社会和制度上的不平等,以消除伤害并赢得信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信