"Core Perception": Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving.

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Dawei Bai, Alon Hafri, Véronique Izard, Chaz Firestone, Brent Strickland
{"title":"\"Core Perception\": Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving.","authors":"Dawei Bai, Alon Hafri, Véronique Izard, Chaz Firestone, Brent Strickland","doi":"10.1017/S0140525X25102756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Core knowledge\" refers to a set of cognitive systems that underwrite early representations of the physical and social world, appear universally across cultures, and likely result from our genetic endowment. Although this framework is canonically considered as a hypothesis about early-emerging <i>conception</i> - how we think and reason about the world - here we present an alternative view: that many such representations are inherently <i>perceptual</i> in nature. This \"core perception\" view explains an intriguing (and otherwise mysterious) aspect of core-knowledge processes and representations: that they also operate in adults, where they display key empirical signatures of perceptual processing. We first illustrate this overlap using recent work on \"core physics\", the domain of core knowledge concerned with physical objects, representing properties such as persistence through time, cohesion, solidity, and causal interactions. We review evidence that adult vision incorporates exactly these representations of core physics, while also displaying empirical signatures of genuinely perceptual mechanisms, such as rapid and automatic operation on the basis of specific sensory inputs, informational encapsulation, and interaction with other perceptual processes. We further argue that the same pattern holds for other areas of core knowledge, including geometrical, numerical, and social domains. In light of this evidence, we conclude that many infant results appealing to precocious reasoning abilities are better explained by sophisticated perceptual mechanisms shared by infants and adults. Our core-perception view elevates the status of perception in accounting for the origins of conceptual knowledge, and generates a range of ready-to-test hypotheses in developmental psychology, vision science, and more.</p>","PeriodicalId":8698,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-75"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25102756","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Core knowledge" refers to a set of cognitive systems that underwrite early representations of the physical and social world, appear universally across cultures, and likely result from our genetic endowment. Although this framework is canonically considered as a hypothesis about early-emerging conception - how we think and reason about the world - here we present an alternative view: that many such representations are inherently perceptual in nature. This "core perception" view explains an intriguing (and otherwise mysterious) aspect of core-knowledge processes and representations: that they also operate in adults, where they display key empirical signatures of perceptual processing. We first illustrate this overlap using recent work on "core physics", the domain of core knowledge concerned with physical objects, representing properties such as persistence through time, cohesion, solidity, and causal interactions. We review evidence that adult vision incorporates exactly these representations of core physics, while also displaying empirical signatures of genuinely perceptual mechanisms, such as rapid and automatic operation on the basis of specific sensory inputs, informational encapsulation, and interaction with other perceptual processes. We further argue that the same pattern holds for other areas of core knowledge, including geometrical, numerical, and social domains. In light of this evidence, we conclude that many infant results appealing to precocious reasoning abilities are better explained by sophisticated perceptual mechanisms shared by infants and adults. Our core-perception view elevates the status of perception in accounting for the origins of conceptual knowledge, and generates a range of ready-to-test hypotheses in developmental psychology, vision science, and more.

“核心感知”:将早熟推理重新想象为复杂感知。
“核心知识”指的是一套认知系统,它涵盖了对物质世界和社会世界的早期表征,在不同文化中普遍存在,可能源于我们的基因禀赋。虽然这个框架通常被认为是关于早期出现的概念的假设-我们如何思考和推理世界-在这里,我们提出了另一种观点:许多这样的表征本质上是感性的。这种“核心知觉”观点解释了核心知识过程和表征的一个有趣(或者神秘)的方面:它们也在成年人中起作用,在那里它们显示出知觉处理的关键经验特征。我们首先用最近在“核心物理学”方面的研究来说明这种重叠,核心物理学是涉及物理对象的核心知识领域,表示诸如时间持久性、内聚性、坚固性和因果相互作用等属性。我们回顾了成人视觉包含这些核心物理表征的证据,同时也显示了真正感知机制的经验特征,例如基于特定感官输入的快速和自动操作,信息封装以及与其他感知过程的相互作用。我们进一步认为,同样的模式也适用于其他核心知识领域,包括几何、数值和社会领域。根据这一证据,我们得出结论,许多婴儿的结果吸引了早熟的推理能力,用婴儿和成人共有的复杂感知机制来更好地解释。我们的核心知觉观点提升了知觉在解释概念知识起源中的地位,并在发展心理学、视觉科学等领域产生了一系列可供检验的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
353
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信