Healthcare Worker Experiences with a Universal Gloving Intervention to Prevent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Julie A Keating, Linda McKinley, Katherine Dolan, Helene Moriarty, Cara Ray, Nasia Safdar
{"title":"Healthcare Worker Experiences with a Universal Gloving Intervention to Prevent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Julie A Keating, Linda McKinley, Katherine Dolan, Helene Moriarty, Cara Ray, Nasia Safdar","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal gloving (healthcare worker gloving for all patient contact regardless of activity or patient condition) may prevent Clostridioides difficile transmission in healthcare settings. However, healthcare worker experiences with universal gloving practices are needed to understand if and how universal gloving programs may be successfully implemented for infection prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a cluster randomized clinical trial in Veterans Affairs inpatient units to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of a universal gloving intervention in preventing C. difficile acquisition among patients, we interviewed healthcare workers on intervention units regarding their experience with the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported their experience with implementing universal gloving as well as impacts to nursing workload and workflow, patient care, and hand hygiene. They also described barriers and facilitators to universal gloving.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Universal gloving is relatively straightforward to implement as an infection prevention strategy. However, barriers, including increased time for tasks, need for cross-disciplinary communication, and glove availability and accessibility, must be addressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Human factors and systems engineering methods may be useful in supporting universal gloving interventions. Additional evidence demonstrating efficacy of the intervention is also needed to support future implementations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.09.020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Universal gloving (healthcare worker gloving for all patient contact regardless of activity or patient condition) may prevent Clostridioides difficile transmission in healthcare settings. However, healthcare worker experiences with universal gloving practices are needed to understand if and how universal gloving programs may be successfully implemented for infection prevention.

Methods: As part of a cluster randomized clinical trial in Veterans Affairs inpatient units to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of a universal gloving intervention in preventing C. difficile acquisition among patients, we interviewed healthcare workers on intervention units regarding their experience with the intervention.

Results: Participants reported their experience with implementing universal gloving as well as impacts to nursing workload and workflow, patient care, and hand hygiene. They also described barriers and facilitators to universal gloving.

Discussion: Universal gloving is relatively straightforward to implement as an infection prevention strategy. However, barriers, including increased time for tasks, need for cross-disciplinary communication, and glove availability and accessibility, must be addressed.

Conclusions: Human factors and systems engineering methods may be useful in supporting universal gloving interventions. Additional evidence demonstrating efficacy of the intervention is also needed to support future implementations.

卫生保健工作者普遍戴手套干预以预防艰难梭菌感染的经验:一项定性研究。
背景:普遍戴手套(卫生保健工作者对所有接触病人的人戴手套,无论其活动或病人状况如何)可以防止艰难梭菌在卫生保健环境中的传播。然而,需要卫生保健工作者普遍戴手套实践的经验,以了解是否以及如何成功实施普遍戴手套计划以预防感染。方法:作为一项在退伍军人事务部住院单位进行的集群随机临床试验的一部分,以评估通用手套干预在预防患者感染艰难梭菌方面的有效性和可接受性,我们采访了干预单位的医护人员,了解他们对干预的经验。结果:参与者报告了他们实施通用手套的经验,以及对护理工作量和工作流程、患者护理和手卫生的影响。他们还描述了普及手套的障碍和促进因素。讨论:作为一项感染预防战略,普遍戴手套相对容易实施。然而,必须解决一些障碍,包括任务时间的增加、跨学科沟通的需要、手套的可用性和可及性。结论:人为因素和系统工程方法可能有助于支持通用手套干预措施。还需要更多证据证明干预措施的有效性,以支持未来的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信