Quantifying the Clinical and Economic Burden of Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in England: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Francesca Kinsella, Nadia Quignot, Stephanie H Read, Gaelle Gusto, Kazue Kikuchi, Dawn Reichenbach, Anita Burrell, Shicheng Weng, Charlotte Pollet, Kris Thiruvillakkat
{"title":"Quantifying the Clinical and Economic Burden of Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in England: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Francesca Kinsella, Nadia Quignot, Stephanie H Read, Gaelle Gusto, Kazue Kikuchi, Dawn Reichenbach, Anita Burrell, Shicheng Weng, Charlotte Pollet, Kris Thiruvillakkat","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03355-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence on the burden of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) among allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients in England is lacking. We compared clinical and economic outcomes among adult allo-HSCT recipients who developed acute GVHD (aGVHD) or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) versus those who did not develop GVHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with haematological malignancies who underwent allo-HSCT in England between 2011 and 2023 and were captured in the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database. Patients were grouped according to GVHD development following allo-HSCT. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates between aGVHD, cGVHD and without-GVHD groups. Clinical (mortality, severe infections) and economic (healthcare resource utilization, costs) outcomes observed during follow-up were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics database and were compared across GVHD groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9450 eligible patients, 5022 (53.14%) developed GVHD. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CI]) indicated that patients with GVHD were at increased risk of mortality (aGVHD 1.61 [1.49-1.75]; cGVHD 2.12 [1.83-2.44]) and severe infection (aGVHD 1.94 [1.79-2.10]; cGVHD 3.11 [2.45-3.95]) versus patients without GVHD. Patients with GVHD had considerably greater overnight hospitalization rates than patients without GVHD (aGVHD 1.32 [95% CI 1.30-1.35] versus 0.55 [95% CI 0.54-0.57]; cGVHD 1.18 [95% CI 1.15-1.22] versus 0.33 [95% CI 0.32-0.35] overnight hospitalization rate per person-year, respectively). Total healthcare costs were approximately doubled for both patients with aGVHD compared with patients without GVHD (mean [standard deviation (SD)] £12,026 [£21,325] versus £6916 [£14,767], p < 0.05) and patients with cGVHD compared with patients without GVHD (mean [SD] £11,707 [£20,722] versus £5227 [£11,041]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GVHD is associated with considerable burden in England, underscoring the urgent need for improved prevention and treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03355-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence on the burden of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) among allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients in England is lacking. We compared clinical and economic outcomes among adult allo-HSCT recipients who developed acute GVHD (aGVHD) or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) versus those who did not develop GVHD.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with haematological malignancies who underwent allo-HSCT in England between 2011 and 2023 and were captured in the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database. Patients were grouped according to GVHD development following allo-HSCT. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates between aGVHD, cGVHD and without-GVHD groups. Clinical (mortality, severe infections) and economic (healthcare resource utilization, costs) outcomes observed during follow-up were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics database and were compared across GVHD groups.
Results: Among 9450 eligible patients, 5022 (53.14%) developed GVHD. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CI]) indicated that patients with GVHD were at increased risk of mortality (aGVHD 1.61 [1.49-1.75]; cGVHD 2.12 [1.83-2.44]) and severe infection (aGVHD 1.94 [1.79-2.10]; cGVHD 3.11 [2.45-3.95]) versus patients without GVHD. Patients with GVHD had considerably greater overnight hospitalization rates than patients without GVHD (aGVHD 1.32 [95% CI 1.30-1.35] versus 0.55 [95% CI 0.54-0.57]; cGVHD 1.18 [95% CI 1.15-1.22] versus 0.33 [95% CI 0.32-0.35] overnight hospitalization rate per person-year, respectively). Total healthcare costs were approximately doubled for both patients with aGVHD compared with patients without GVHD (mean [standard deviation (SD)] £12,026 [£21,325] versus £6916 [£14,767], p < 0.05) and patients with cGVHD compared with patients without GVHD (mean [SD] £11,707 [£20,722] versus £5227 [£11,041]).
Conclusions: GVHD is associated with considerable burden in England, underscoring the urgent need for improved prevention and treatment options.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.