An Overview of West African Traditional Soft Cheese: Processing, Safety, and Quality Characteristics

IF 14.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mahounakpon Wilfried Tossou, Matthew Atongbiik Achaglinkame, Linda Dari, Carole Nadia Adjouavi Sossa-Vihotogbé, Zsanett Bodor, Daniel Mörlein
{"title":"An Overview of West African Traditional Soft Cheese: Processing, Safety, and Quality Characteristics","authors":"Mahounakpon Wilfried Tossou,&nbsp;Matthew Atongbiik Achaglinkame,&nbsp;Linda Dari,&nbsp;Carole Nadia Adjouavi Sossa-Vihotogbé,&nbsp;Zsanett Bodor,&nbsp;Daniel Mörlein","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>West African soft cheese (WASC) is widely consumed and nutritionally valuable across West Africa. It also sustains livelihoods, particularly among Fulani households, by providing regular income for women and strengthens household food security and autonomy. However, concerns persist about its safety and quality. A scoping review was conducted to synthesize evidence on WASC processing, safety, and quality. The findings showed that cow's milk (88.6%) and <i>Calotropis procera</i> (77.1%) were the predominant milk source and coagulant, respectively. Two research areas contribute to about one third of the total articles reviewed: alternative coagulants (22.9%) and partial substitution of cow's milk (11.4%). Among the various coagulants tested, only <i>Carica papaya</i> consistently achieved yields comparable to <i>Cal. procera</i>. Partial substitution with plant-based milks differentially influenced yield and composition. Findings indicated frequent microbiological hazards in market-sold WASC, with aerobic plate counts often exceeding limits and recurrent reports of coliforms and pathogens (e.g., <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Salmonella</i>). In contrast, WASC produced under controlled laboratory conditions showed low aerobic counts and the absence of coliforms. In general, reporting quality was a major limitation, as most of the studies reviewed failed in reporting key processing parameters such as heating temperatures and times, coagulant concentration, and coagulation time, factors essential for assessing and reproducing cheese quality. In conclusion, this review underscores the urgent need for hygiene interventions across the value chain. Moreover, comprehensive research is needed to assess how different coagulants, extraction methods, heating conditions, and the alternatives could affect the yield, sensory characteristics, and overall quality of WASC.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70301","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

West African soft cheese (WASC) is widely consumed and nutritionally valuable across West Africa. It also sustains livelihoods, particularly among Fulani households, by providing regular income for women and strengthens household food security and autonomy. However, concerns persist about its safety and quality. A scoping review was conducted to synthesize evidence on WASC processing, safety, and quality. The findings showed that cow's milk (88.6%) and Calotropis procera (77.1%) were the predominant milk source and coagulant, respectively. Two research areas contribute to about one third of the total articles reviewed: alternative coagulants (22.9%) and partial substitution of cow's milk (11.4%). Among the various coagulants tested, only Carica papaya consistently achieved yields comparable to Cal. procera. Partial substitution with plant-based milks differentially influenced yield and composition. Findings indicated frequent microbiological hazards in market-sold WASC, with aerobic plate counts often exceeding limits and recurrent reports of coliforms and pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Salmonella). In contrast, WASC produced under controlled laboratory conditions showed low aerobic counts and the absence of coliforms. In general, reporting quality was a major limitation, as most of the studies reviewed failed in reporting key processing parameters such as heating temperatures and times, coagulant concentration, and coagulation time, factors essential for assessing and reproducing cheese quality. In conclusion, this review underscores the urgent need for hygiene interventions across the value chain. Moreover, comprehensive research is needed to assess how different coagulants, extraction methods, heating conditions, and the alternatives could affect the yield, sensory characteristics, and overall quality of WASC.

Abstract Image

西非传统软奶酪综述:加工、安全和质量特征。
西非软奶酪(WASC)在西非被广泛消费,具有很高的营养价值。它还通过为妇女提供固定收入和加强家庭粮食安全和自主权,维持生计,特别是富拉尼家庭的生计。然而,对其安全性和质量的担忧仍然存在。进行了一项范围综述,以综合有关WASC加工,安全性和质量的证据。结果表明,牛奶(88.6%)和procercalotropis(77.1%)分别是主要的奶源和凝固剂。两个研究领域贡献了大约三分之一的文章综述:替代凝血剂(22.9%)和部分替代牛奶(11.4%)。在测试的各种混凝剂中,只有加勒比木瓜始终达到与Cal. procera相当的产量。植物性牛奶的部分替代对产量和成分有不同的影响。研究结果表明,市场销售的WASC中经常出现微生物危害,有氧平板计数经常超过限制,大肠菌群和病原体(如大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌)的反复报道。相比之下,在受控的实验室条件下产生的WASC显示出低有氧计数和大肠菌群的缺失。一般来说,报告质量是一个主要的限制,因为大多数研究未能报告关键的加工参数,如加热温度和时间,混凝剂浓度和凝固时间,这些因素对评估和再现奶酪质量至关重要。总之,本综述强调了在整个价值链中采取卫生干预措施的迫切需要。此外,还需要进行综合研究,以评估不同的混凝剂、提取方法、加热条件和替代品对WASC产率、感官特性和整体质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信