India's household GHG emissions from basic goods: Regional patterns and inequalities

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Shelly Bogra, Felix Creutzig, Peter-Paul Pichler
{"title":"India's household GHG emissions from basic goods: Regional patterns and inequalities","authors":"Shelly Bogra,&nbsp;Felix Creutzig,&nbsp;Peter-Paul Pichler","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>India's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trajectory will be critical to keeping global temperature rise well below 2 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mo>∘</mo>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$^{\\circ}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> C. India has a vast and heterogeneous socio-economic landscape that shapes household consumption patterns across regions and settlement types. To resolve differences at the regional, urban/rural, and socio-economic levels, we use a bottom-up method based on physical quantities and regional prices for thirty-three basic household goods. Here we show that this high-resolution approach, applied to 35 states and union territories in India for the period 2011–2012, reveals substantial differences in household GHG emissions across expenditure groups and settlement types. Per capita emissions are higher in urban areas (2.7 tCO <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> eq) than in rural areas (2.2 tCO <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> eq), but rural households account for two-thirds of total household emissions (2.6 GtCO <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> eq). Major contributors include fuel and lighting (1015 MtCO <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> eq), milk and dairy products (610 MtCO <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> eq), meat and eggs (430 MtCO <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> eq), and transportation (275 MtCO <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> eq). Six states alone contribute half of the total emissions. The top 10% of households emit about four times more per capita than the bottom 10%, with particularly pronounced disparities in transportation emissions, where urban inequalities are about twice those of rural areas. Achieving adequate nutrition for the most deprived households by 2012 would have increased total emissions by 14.5% (0.37 tCO <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> per capita, 83% rural). These findings highlight the factors underlying regional and socio-economic disparities in household emissions and provide a basis for designing region-specific policies that mitigate emissions where needed while improving development outcomes for the most vulnerable, which is essential for effective and equitable low-carbon development in India's diverse contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 5","pages":"1736-1747"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trajectory will be critical to keeping global temperature rise well below 2 $^{\circ}$ C. India has a vast and heterogeneous socio-economic landscape that shapes household consumption patterns across regions and settlement types. To resolve differences at the regional, urban/rural, and socio-economic levels, we use a bottom-up method based on physical quantities and regional prices for thirty-three basic household goods. Here we show that this high-resolution approach, applied to 35 states and union territories in India for the period 2011–2012, reveals substantial differences in household GHG emissions across expenditure groups and settlement types. Per capita emissions are higher in urban areas (2.7 tCO 2 $_{2}$ eq) than in rural areas (2.2 tCO 2 $_{2}$ eq), but rural households account for two-thirds of total household emissions (2.6 GtCO 2 $_{2}$ eq). Major contributors include fuel and lighting (1015 MtCO 2 $_{2}$ eq), milk and dairy products (610 MtCO 2 $_{2}$ eq), meat and eggs (430 MtCO 2 $_{2}$ eq), and transportation (275 MtCO 2 $_{2}$ eq). Six states alone contribute half of the total emissions. The top 10% of households emit about four times more per capita than the bottom 10%, with particularly pronounced disparities in transportation emissions, where urban inequalities are about twice those of rural areas. Achieving adequate nutrition for the most deprived households by 2012 would have increased total emissions by 14.5% (0.37 tCO 2 $_{2}$ per capita, 83% rural). These findings highlight the factors underlying regional and socio-economic disparities in household emissions and provide a basis for designing region-specific policies that mitigate emissions where needed while improving development outcomes for the most vulnerable, which is essential for effective and equitable low-carbon development in India's diverse contexts.

Abstract Image

印度基本商品的家庭温室气体排放:地区模式和不平等
印度的温室气体(GHG)排放轨迹对于将全球气温上升幅度控制在2°$ {\c}$ c以内至关重要。印度有着广阔而多元的社会经济格局,影响着不同地区和不同居住类型的家庭消费模式。为了解决地区、城乡和社会经济层面的差异,我们采用了一种基于33种基本生活用品的数量和地区价格的自下而上的方法。在这里,我们展示了这种高分辨率的方法,应用于2011-2012年期间印度的35个州和联邦领土,揭示了不同支出组和定居类型的家庭温室气体排放的巨大差异。城市地区的人均排放量(2.7万亿美元/立方米)高于农村地区(2.2万亿美元/立方米/立方米)。但农村家庭占家庭总排放量的三分之二(2.6亿吨二氧化碳当量)。主要贡献者包括燃料和照明(1015亿吨二氧化碳)、牛奶和乳制品(610亿吨二氧化碳)、肉类和蛋类(4.3亿吨二氧化碳$_ bbb $ $ eq),交通运输(2.75亿吨二氧化碳$_ bbb $ eq)。仅六个州就贡献了总排放量的一半。收入最高的10%家庭的人均排放量大约是收入最低的10%家庭的四倍,交通运输方面的差距尤其明显,城市的差距大约是农村地区的两倍。到2012年使最贫困的家庭获得足够的营养将使总排放量增加14.5%(人均0.37亿吨二氧化碳美元,83%为农村地区)。这些发现突出了家庭排放的区域和社会经济差异背后的因素,并为设计特定区域政策提供了基础,这些政策可以在必要时减少排放,同时改善最脆弱群体的发展成果,这对于在印度不同背景下实现有效和公平的低碳发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信