Ex–ante LCA for circular resource management of liquid digestate, by predictive modeling of algae–bacterial processes

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Diego Penaranda, Francesca Casagli, Marjorie Morales, Fabrice Beline, Olivier Bernard
{"title":"Ex–ante LCA for circular resource management of liquid digestate, by predictive modeling of algae–bacterial processes","authors":"Diego Penaranda,&nbsp;Francesca Casagli,&nbsp;Marjorie Morales,&nbsp;Fabrice Beline,&nbsp;Olivier Bernard","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The simplest method for treating liquid digestate, which involves directly spreading it over local agricultural land, is facing scrutiny due to the challenges of transporting large volumes and the environmental risks posed by nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants. Improvements in liquid digestate treatment are necessary to mitigate these threats and support a growing circular economy. This study evaluates an advanced digestate treatment method that decouples hydraulic retention time (HRT) and solid retention time (SRT) in high-rate algal/bacterial ponds (HRABPs). By combining life cycle assessment (LCA) with high-fidelity modeling for HRABPs, this study simulates productivity and removal efficiencies under realistic climatological conditions, providing life cycle inventories for numerous large-scale scenarios. To minimize environmental impacts while maximizing algal productivity and nitrogen intake in the algal biomass, 36 scenarios were simulated, considering different HRT, SRT, alkalinity addition, winter storage, and biomass post-treatment hypotheses. The results demonstrate that microalgae treatment makes sense for valorizing liquid digestate, proving to be less impactful than direct land application. However, the LCA results also highlight the complexity of the issue. Low HRT (HRT = 5 days &lt; SRT = 10 days), including winter storage, requires the smallest production area, resulting in high productivity and low environmental impacts. Conversely, high HRT (HRT = 90 days &gt; &gt; SRT = 15 days) achieves the highest efficiency in nitrogen and phosphorus recycling but necessitates large production areas, leading to high environmental impacts. Mathematical modeling, coupled with LCA, can resolve these trade-offs and guide the optimization and scaling-up of climatology-dependent systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 5","pages":"1568-1582"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The simplest method for treating liquid digestate, which involves directly spreading it over local agricultural land, is facing scrutiny due to the challenges of transporting large volumes and the environmental risks posed by nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants. Improvements in liquid digestate treatment are necessary to mitigate these threats and support a growing circular economy. This study evaluates an advanced digestate treatment method that decouples hydraulic retention time (HRT) and solid retention time (SRT) in high-rate algal/bacterial ponds (HRABPs). By combining life cycle assessment (LCA) with high-fidelity modeling for HRABPs, this study simulates productivity and removal efficiencies under realistic climatological conditions, providing life cycle inventories for numerous large-scale scenarios. To minimize environmental impacts while maximizing algal productivity and nitrogen intake in the algal biomass, 36 scenarios were simulated, considering different HRT, SRT, alkalinity addition, winter storage, and biomass post-treatment hypotheses. The results demonstrate that microalgae treatment makes sense for valorizing liquid digestate, proving to be less impactful than direct land application. However, the LCA results also highlight the complexity of the issue. Low HRT (HRT = 5 days < SRT = 10 days), including winter storage, requires the smallest production area, resulting in high productivity and low environmental impacts. Conversely, high HRT (HRT = 90 days > > SRT = 15 days) achieves the highest efficiency in nitrogen and phosphorus recycling but necessitates large production areas, leading to high environmental impacts. Mathematical modeling, coupled with LCA, can resolve these trade-offs and guide the optimization and scaling-up of climatology-dependent systems.

Abstract Image

通过对藻类-细菌过程的预测建模,将事前LCA用于液体消化液的循环资源管理
处理液体消化液的最简单方法是直接将其撒在当地的农业用地上,由于大量运输的挑战以及氮和磷污染物带来的环境风险,这种方法正面临审查。为了减轻这些威胁并支持不断增长的循环经济,改进液体消化处理是必要的。本研究评估了一种在高速率藻/细菌池(HRABPs)中分离水力停留时间(HRT)和固体停留时间(SRT)的先进消化处理方法。通过将生命周期评估(LCA)与hrabp的高保真建模相结合,本研究模拟了现实气候条件下的生产力和去除效率,为许多大规模情景提供了生命周期清单。为了最大限度地减少环境影响,同时最大限度地提高藻类产量和藻类生物量的氮摄入量,我们模拟了36种情况,考虑了不同的HRT、SRT、碱度添加、冬季储存和生物量后处理假设。结果表明,微藻处理对液体消化物的增值是有意义的,证明比直接土地应用的影响要小。然而,LCA的结果也凸显了这个问题的复杂性。低HRT (HRT = 5天<; SRT = 10天),包括冬季储存,需要最小的生产面积,从而实现高生产率和低环境影响。相反,高HRT (HRT = 90天>; > SRT = 15天)的氮磷回收效率最高,但需要较大的生产面积,导致高环境影响。与LCA相结合的数学建模可以解决这些权衡,并指导气候学依赖系统的优化和扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信