Slow and unequal reduction in Austrian household GHG footprints between 2000 and 2020

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Christian Dorninger, Simone Gingrich, Willi Haas, Alina Brad, Etienne Schneider, Dominik Wiedenhofer
{"title":"Slow and unequal reduction in Austrian household GHG footprints between 2000 and 2020","authors":"Christian Dorninger,&nbsp;Simone Gingrich,&nbsp;Willi Haas,&nbsp;Alina Brad,&nbsp;Etienne Schneider,&nbsp;Dominik Wiedenhofer","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the trends and distribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions embodied in household consumption is pivotal to developing climate-change mitigation strategies that are just and effective. While household GHG footprints inequality is increasingly investigated, less is known about its temporal dynamics across product groups. For the case of Austria, we (1) develop a database for household GHG footprints from 2000 to 2020 by combining multi-regional input–output modeling with household budget surveys, (2) investigate temporal trends across consumption categories and income groups, and (3) explore socio-economic explanatory variables. We find that the sum of Austrian household GHG footprints declined from 73 Mt CO2eq in 2000 to 67 Mt CO2eq in 2020. In 2005, when Austrian GHG emissions peaked, the highest income decile induced 3.5 times more GHG emissions than the lowest income decile. This factor remained similarly high at 3.4 until 2020, particularly due to trends in the consumption categories <i>mobility</i> and <i>goods</i>. The most notable GHG reduction was achieved in <i>housing/heating</i>, where carbon inequality was less pronounced. Beyond income, floor space, car ownership, the heating system, household size, and the number of vacations significantly affect GHG footprints. Our findings suggest that reducing stubbornly high carbon inequality, particularly in the consumption of <i>mobility</i> and <i>goods</i>, can contribute to more effective climate-change mitigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 5","pages":"1651-1665"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the trends and distribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions embodied in household consumption is pivotal to developing climate-change mitigation strategies that are just and effective. While household GHG footprints inequality is increasingly investigated, less is known about its temporal dynamics across product groups. For the case of Austria, we (1) develop a database for household GHG footprints from 2000 to 2020 by combining multi-regional input–output modeling with household budget surveys, (2) investigate temporal trends across consumption categories and income groups, and (3) explore socio-economic explanatory variables. We find that the sum of Austrian household GHG footprints declined from 73 Mt CO2eq in 2000 to 67 Mt CO2eq in 2020. In 2005, when Austrian GHG emissions peaked, the highest income decile induced 3.5 times more GHG emissions than the lowest income decile. This factor remained similarly high at 3.4 until 2020, particularly due to trends in the consumption categories mobility and goods. The most notable GHG reduction was achieved in housing/heating, where carbon inequality was less pronounced. Beyond income, floor space, car ownership, the heating system, household size, and the number of vacations significantly affect GHG footprints. Our findings suggest that reducing stubbornly high carbon inequality, particularly in the consumption of mobility and goods, can contribute to more effective climate-change mitigation.

Abstract Image

2000年至2020年奥地利家庭温室气体足迹减少缓慢且不均
了解家庭消费中温室气体排放的趋势和分布,对于制定公正有效的减缓气候变化战略至关重要。虽然对家庭温室气体足迹不平等的调查越来越多,但对其在产品组之间的时间动态知之甚少。以奥地利为例,我们(1)通过将多区域投入产出模型与家庭预算调查相结合,开发了2000 - 2020年家庭温室气体足迹数据库;(2)研究了消费类别和收入群体的时间趋势;(3)探索社会经济解释变量。我们发现奥地利家庭温室气体足迹总量从2000年的7300万吨二氧化碳当量下降到2020年的6700万吨二氧化碳当量。2005年,奥地利温室气体排放达到峰值,最高收入十分位数的温室气体排放量是最低收入十分位数的3.5倍。直到2020年,这一因素仍然保持在3.4的高水平,特别是由于消费类别流动性和商品的趋势。最显著的温室气体减排是在住房/供暖领域实现的,在这些领域,碳不平等不太明显。除了收入之外,建筑面积、汽车拥有量、供暖系统、家庭规模和度假次数对温室气体足迹也有显著影响。我们的研究结果表明,减少顽固的高碳不平等,特别是在交通和商品消费方面,可以有助于更有效地减缓气候变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信