How do political steering instruments influence the integration of chemical recycling into plastic recycling networks? A case study for Germany

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Christoph Stallkamp, Teresa Oehlcke, Rebekka Volk, Malte Hennig, Frank Schultmann
{"title":"How do political steering instruments influence the integration of chemical recycling into plastic recycling networks? A case study for Germany","authors":"Christoph Stallkamp,&nbsp;Teresa Oehlcke,&nbsp;Rebekka Volk,&nbsp;Malte Hennig,&nbsp;Frank Schultmann","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A steadily increasing plastic production requires the treatment of ever greater amounts of plastic waste. Plastic waste that is unsuitable for mechanical recycling is incinerated in Europe, generating large amounts of CO<sub>2</sub>. Chemical recycling of such plastic waste offers an alternative to reduce the climate change impact (CCI) of plastic waste treatment and contributes toward closing the plastic loop. This paper presents a strategic location optimization model designed to effectively integrate chemical recycling facilities into existing waste treatment networks. The model optimizes material flows for both operational costs and CCI and is extended by using a goal programming approach to balance both objectives. The study focuses on two significant waste streams: (1) lightweight packaging, which in Germany accounts for 59% of post-consumer plastic waste, with 34% of it being unsuitable for mechanical recycling, and (2) automotive plastic waste, which as engineering plastics from the automotive sector presents a challenge for recycling due to its complex composition. Moreover, the study explores scenarios to evaluate political instruments and quantifies their impacts on the German plastic waste treatment network. It quantifies the impact of an increase of a legal national recycling rate and the extension of emission trading systems to the German waste sector as it was implemented in early 2024. Raising the recycling rate to 65% or introducing a CO<sub>2</sub> emission fee of 45€/t CO<sub>2</sub> could reduce the waste treatment network's CCI by up to 64% while increasing the circularity and decarbonization of plastics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 5","pages":"1850-1866"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A steadily increasing plastic production requires the treatment of ever greater amounts of plastic waste. Plastic waste that is unsuitable for mechanical recycling is incinerated in Europe, generating large amounts of CO2. Chemical recycling of such plastic waste offers an alternative to reduce the climate change impact (CCI) of plastic waste treatment and contributes toward closing the plastic loop. This paper presents a strategic location optimization model designed to effectively integrate chemical recycling facilities into existing waste treatment networks. The model optimizes material flows for both operational costs and CCI and is extended by using a goal programming approach to balance both objectives. The study focuses on two significant waste streams: (1) lightweight packaging, which in Germany accounts for 59% of post-consumer plastic waste, with 34% of it being unsuitable for mechanical recycling, and (2) automotive plastic waste, which as engineering plastics from the automotive sector presents a challenge for recycling due to its complex composition. Moreover, the study explores scenarios to evaluate political instruments and quantifies their impacts on the German plastic waste treatment network. It quantifies the impact of an increase of a legal national recycling rate and the extension of emission trading systems to the German waste sector as it was implemented in early 2024. Raising the recycling rate to 65% or introducing a CO2 emission fee of 45€/t CO2 could reduce the waste treatment network's CCI by up to 64% while increasing the circularity and decarbonization of plastics.

Abstract Image

政治指导手段如何影响化学回收与塑料回收网络的整合?德国的案例研究
稳步增长的塑料生产需要处理越来越多的塑料废物。在欧洲,不适合机械回收的塑料垃圾被焚烧,产生大量的二氧化碳。这种塑料废物的化学回收为减少塑料废物处理对气候变化的影响(CCI)提供了另一种选择,并有助于关闭塑料循环。本文提出了一个战略区位优化模型,旨在有效地将化学回收设施整合到现有的废物处理网络中。该模型优化了运营成本和CCI的物料流,并通过使用目标规划方法来平衡这两个目标。该研究的重点是两个重要的废物流:(1)轻型包装,在德国占消费后塑料废物的59%,其中34%不适合机械回收;(2)汽车塑料废物,作为汽车行业的工程塑料,由于其复杂的成分,对回收提出了挑战。此外,该研究还探讨了评估政治工具的情景,并量化了它们对德国塑料废物处理网络的影响。它量化了2024年初实施的提高国家法定回收率和将排放交易体系扩展到德国废物部门的影响。将回收率提高到65%或引入45欧元/吨二氧化碳的二氧化碳排放费可以将废物处理网络的CCI降低高达64%,同时增加塑料的循环性和脱碳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信