Ainara Ugarte-Anero, Unai Fernandez-Gamiz, Koldo Portal-Porras, Jose Manuel Lopez-Guede
{"title":"A novel approach of aerosol emissions under different expiratory activities- an experimental study","authors":"Ainara Ugarte-Anero, Unai Fernandez-Gamiz, Koldo Portal-Porras, Jose Manuel Lopez-Guede","doi":"10.1007/s11869-025-01791-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The behavior of breathing aerosols has become an enigma after the large number of diseases that are transmitted by air. The current project presents an experimental analysis providing results on the characteristics of aerosols when exhaled into the environment after different respiratory actions. The study involved 24 participants (12 women and 12 men) aged between 20 and 30 years. The respiratory actions of the individuals were analyzed using the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS). The designed configuration is based on the collection of aerosols by means of a funnel; designed, optimized and studied in this research. The respiratory actions chosen for the study were breathing, talking and coughing. As a novelty, the analysis of what is produced by the combination of talking and coughing in the same period is included, thus providing new data on real situations experienced by individuals in their daily lives. The results show that cough generates aerosols with an average particle concentration of 9.039 cm<sup>−3</sup> being the highest mean value analyzed, followed by respiration with a value of 1.493 cm<sup>−3</sup>. The mean mass concentration generated in the expiratory activity of respiration generates an average of 1.295 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, while the action of coughing multiplies that value by ten obtaining a total mass of 11.81 µg m<sup>−3</sup>. The combination of two respiratory actions, such as coughing and talking in the same period compared to just talking, shows very similar values, both in particle number concentration and mass. The size distributions almost overlap, making it evident that there is not much difference and the coughing action hardly influences the 90 s period analyzed when talking occupies more space.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 9","pages":"2717 - 2725"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11869-025-01791-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-025-01791-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The behavior of breathing aerosols has become an enigma after the large number of diseases that are transmitted by air. The current project presents an experimental analysis providing results on the characteristics of aerosols when exhaled into the environment after different respiratory actions. The study involved 24 participants (12 women and 12 men) aged between 20 and 30 years. The respiratory actions of the individuals were analyzed using the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS). The designed configuration is based on the collection of aerosols by means of a funnel; designed, optimized and studied in this research. The respiratory actions chosen for the study were breathing, talking and coughing. As a novelty, the analysis of what is produced by the combination of talking and coughing in the same period is included, thus providing new data on real situations experienced by individuals in their daily lives. The results show that cough generates aerosols with an average particle concentration of 9.039 cm−3 being the highest mean value analyzed, followed by respiration with a value of 1.493 cm−3. The mean mass concentration generated in the expiratory activity of respiration generates an average of 1.295 µg m−3, while the action of coughing multiplies that value by ten obtaining a total mass of 11.81 µg m−3. The combination of two respiratory actions, such as coughing and talking in the same period compared to just talking, shows very similar values, both in particle number concentration and mass. The size distributions almost overlap, making it evident that there is not much difference and the coughing action hardly influences the 90 s period analyzed when talking occupies more space.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.