UV Index from Global Solar Irradiance: Performance according to cloudiness and air mass

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Agustín Laguarda, Gonzalo Abal
{"title":"UV Index from Global Solar Irradiance: Performance according to cloudiness and air mass","authors":"Agustín Laguarda,&nbsp;Gonzalo Abal","doi":"10.1007/s11869-025-01788-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ultraviolet (UV) irradiance from the Sun has potential negative health impacts. Erythemal UV irradiance (UV-E) is obtained by weighting UV radiation in the 250-400 nm range with the average skin erythemal response function. UV-E is proportional to the UV Index (UVI), a tool used worldwide to inform the public about this environmental hazard. Since this magnitude is not currently measured at most meteorological sites, satellite based estimates are often used to generate UV-E information over broad areas. However, for a climatological characterization of variability and typical doses of UV-E, long time series with low biases are required. An alternative approach is to estimate UV-E from readily available information with which UV-E is highly correlated. This work builds upon previous research, which evaluated a simple model (Power Model or PM) to estimate UV-E from Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI), relative air mass, and total atmospheric ozone concentration at the 10-minute level. In that general analysis, the model showed an uncertainty below 12% (as measured by its relative Root Mean Squared Deviation or rRMSD) when compared with ground UV-E measurements. Here, we present a more in-depth assessment of this model, using high-quality data from four mid-latitude temperate sites. The deviations of the model estimates from UVI ground measurements are analyzed under different cloudiness conditions and across a broad range of air masses. Our results confirm that PM performs best under clear skies and low air masses, precisely the conditions associated to the higher incident solar irradiances and potentially dangerous UV levels. Under these conditions, the PM has an average accuracy (rRMSD across sites) of less than 6% of the average of the measurements and outperforms. These results confirm that the model, particularly in its unbiased version, is a reliable and practical tool for the climatological analysis of erythemal UV irradiance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 9","pages":"2687 - 2703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-025-01788-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiance from the Sun has potential negative health impacts. Erythemal UV irradiance (UV-E) is obtained by weighting UV radiation in the 250-400 nm range with the average skin erythemal response function. UV-E is proportional to the UV Index (UVI), a tool used worldwide to inform the public about this environmental hazard. Since this magnitude is not currently measured at most meteorological sites, satellite based estimates are often used to generate UV-E information over broad areas. However, for a climatological characterization of variability and typical doses of UV-E, long time series with low biases are required. An alternative approach is to estimate UV-E from readily available information with which UV-E is highly correlated. This work builds upon previous research, which evaluated a simple model (Power Model or PM) to estimate UV-E from Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI), relative air mass, and total atmospheric ozone concentration at the 10-minute level. In that general analysis, the model showed an uncertainty below 12% (as measured by its relative Root Mean Squared Deviation or rRMSD) when compared with ground UV-E measurements. Here, we present a more in-depth assessment of this model, using high-quality data from four mid-latitude temperate sites. The deviations of the model estimates from UVI ground measurements are analyzed under different cloudiness conditions and across a broad range of air masses. Our results confirm that PM performs best under clear skies and low air masses, precisely the conditions associated to the higher incident solar irradiances and potentially dangerous UV levels. Under these conditions, the PM has an average accuracy (rRMSD across sites) of less than 6% of the average of the measurements and outperforms. These results confirm that the model, particularly in its unbiased version, is a reliable and practical tool for the climatological analysis of erythemal UV irradiance.

全球太阳辐照度的紫外线指数:根据云量和气团的表现
来自太阳的紫外线辐射对健康有潜在的负面影响。红斑紫外线辐照度(UV- e)是将250- 400nm范围内的紫外线辐射与平均皮肤红斑响应函数加权得到的。紫外线- e与紫外线指数成正比,紫外线指数是全世界用来向公众通报这种环境危害的工具。由于目前大多数气象站都没有测量到这一震级,因此基于卫星的估计通常用于生成大范围内的UV-E信息。然而,对于变率和典型UV-E剂量的气候特征,需要低偏差的长时间序列。另一种方法是根据与UV-E高度相关的现成信息估计UV-E。这项工作建立在先前的研究基础上,该研究评估了一个简单的模型(功率模型或PM),通过全球水平辐照度(GHI)、相对空气质量和10分钟水平的大气总臭氧浓度来估计紫外线- e。在一般分析中,与地面UV-E测量值相比,该模型的不确定性低于12%(根据其相对均方根偏差或rRMSD测量)。在这里,我们使用来自四个中纬度温带站点的高质量数据对该模型进行了更深入的评估。在不同的云量条件下和在大范围的气团范围内,分析了模式估计与UVI地面测量值的偏差。我们的研究结果证实,PM在晴朗的天空和低气团下表现最好,正是与较高的入射太阳辐照度和潜在危险的紫外线水平相关的条件。在这些条件下,PM的平均精度(跨站点的rRMSD)小于测量平均值的6%,并且表现优异。这些结果证实,该模型,特别是其无偏版本,是一个可靠和实用的工具,用于红斑紫外线辐照度的气候学分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信