{"title":"Pricing policy and queue-length disclosure in on-demand service platforms","authors":"Donghao Zhu , Stefan Minner , Martin Bichler","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online service platforms, such as ride-hailing and freight exchanges, generate revenue and profits through commissions. To attract users and maximize profit while managing platform costs, these platforms strategically implement different pricing and queue-length disclosure policies. Dynamic pricing based on queue length can increase revenue but may also reduce user loyalty, leading to higher platform costs. The choice of queue-length disclosure policy influences customer balking behavior: revealing queue lengths may deter users from joining if they perceive the wait as too long, while not disclosing the queue length leads customers to decide probabilistically, driven by uncertainty about the wait time. We analyze a two-sided queueing model in which both customers and suppliers arrive randomly, queue separately, and engage in immediate matching at the front of the queue. We examine different pricing and queue-length disclosure policies to maximize the platform’s expected profit. Optimizing the underlying semi-Markov decision process requires solving a non-convex quadratically constrained quadratic program. Through uniformization, we derive and solve the optimality equations, and then compare the resulting optimal prices, profits, and throughput. Our findings indicate that pricing and queue-length disclosure policies are complementary. Specifically, dynamic pricing and visible queue lengths both increase expected profit, while static pricing and invisible queue lengths both increase throughput. These outcomes are driven by changes in the average transaction price under different policies. We identify unique thresholds that determine the preferred pricing and queue-length disclosure policies. The choice of pricing policy depends on the extra cost of implementing dynamic pricing compared to a static price, while the selection of queue-length disclosure policy depends on customer sensitivity to service delay.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 104422"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525004636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Online service platforms, such as ride-hailing and freight exchanges, generate revenue and profits through commissions. To attract users and maximize profit while managing platform costs, these platforms strategically implement different pricing and queue-length disclosure policies. Dynamic pricing based on queue length can increase revenue but may also reduce user loyalty, leading to higher platform costs. The choice of queue-length disclosure policy influences customer balking behavior: revealing queue lengths may deter users from joining if they perceive the wait as too long, while not disclosing the queue length leads customers to decide probabilistically, driven by uncertainty about the wait time. We analyze a two-sided queueing model in which both customers and suppliers arrive randomly, queue separately, and engage in immediate matching at the front of the queue. We examine different pricing and queue-length disclosure policies to maximize the platform’s expected profit. Optimizing the underlying semi-Markov decision process requires solving a non-convex quadratically constrained quadratic program. Through uniformization, we derive and solve the optimality equations, and then compare the resulting optimal prices, profits, and throughput. Our findings indicate that pricing and queue-length disclosure policies are complementary. Specifically, dynamic pricing and visible queue lengths both increase expected profit, while static pricing and invisible queue lengths both increase throughput. These outcomes are driven by changes in the average transaction price under different policies. We identify unique thresholds that determine the preferred pricing and queue-length disclosure policies. The choice of pricing policy depends on the extra cost of implementing dynamic pricing compared to a static price, while the selection of queue-length disclosure policy depends on customer sensitivity to service delay.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.