Development and validation of the information ethics behavior evaluation scale for nurses.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Hitomi Sakamoto, Takuya Nagamine
{"title":"Development and validation of the information ethics behavior evaluation scale for nurses.","authors":"Hitomi Sakamoto, Takuya Nagamine","doi":"10.5116/ijme.68d1.220a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop a reliable and valid scale to assess nurses' information ethics behavior, facilitating self-reflection and supporting the application of ethical principles in clinical settings involving digital information management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scale development study with exploratory factor analysis was conducted in 2023, targeting 1,464 hospital-based and home-visit nurses across Japan. Participants completed a preliminary version of the Information Ethics Behavior Evaluation Scale for Nurses along with demographic questions. Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using the alpha factor extraction method and promax rotation were performed. Criterion-related validity was assessed via Spearman's rank-order correlation with the Self-Evaluation Scale for Ethical Behavior as a Nurse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Valid responses were obtained from 427 participants. Item analysis led to the exclusion of 14 items due to low factor loadings or double loading. EFA identified a three-factor structure comprising 21 items: (1) conscious behavior in handling information, (2) appropriate information management, and (3) response to information leakage risk. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .86). Criterion-related validity was supported by a significant correlation with the external measure (r<sub>s</sub> = .74, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Information Ethics Behavior Evaluation Scale for Nurses is a brief, reliable, and valid tool for assessing ethical conduct related to information handling in nursing practice. It provides a framework for ethical self-assessment and may contribute to the prevention of information breaches and the promotion of ethical decision-making. Further research should investigate the integration of digital literacy and internet-specific ethical competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"16 ","pages":"156-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.68d1.220a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop a reliable and valid scale to assess nurses' information ethics behavior, facilitating self-reflection and supporting the application of ethical principles in clinical settings involving digital information management.

Methods: A scale development study with exploratory factor analysis was conducted in 2023, targeting 1,464 hospital-based and home-visit nurses across Japan. Participants completed a preliminary version of the Information Ethics Behavior Evaluation Scale for Nurses along with demographic questions. Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using the alpha factor extraction method and promax rotation were performed. Criterion-related validity was assessed via Spearman's rank-order correlation with the Self-Evaluation Scale for Ethical Behavior as a Nurse.

Results: Valid responses were obtained from 427 participants. Item analysis led to the exclusion of 14 items due to low factor loadings or double loading. EFA identified a three-factor structure comprising 21 items: (1) conscious behavior in handling information, (2) appropriate information management, and (3) response to information leakage risk. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .86). Criterion-related validity was supported by a significant correlation with the external measure (rs = .74, p < .001).

Conclusions: The Information Ethics Behavior Evaluation Scale for Nurses is a brief, reliable, and valid tool for assessing ethical conduct related to information handling in nursing practice. It provides a framework for ethical self-assessment and may contribute to the prevention of information breaches and the promotion of ethical decision-making. Further research should investigate the integration of digital literacy and internet-specific ethical competencies.

护士信息伦理行为评价量表的编制与验证。
目的:设计一套可靠有效的护士信息伦理行为评估量表,促进护士自我反思,支持护士信息伦理原则在数字化信息管理临床环境中的应用。方法:采用探索性因子分析的量表开发研究方法,于2023年对日本1464名医院及家访护士进行问卷调查。参与者完成了护士信息伦理行为评估量表的初步版本以及人口统计问题。采用α因子提取法和promax旋转法进行项目分析和探索性因子分析(EFA)。标准相关效度通过Spearman的秩序相关量表与护士道德行为自我评价量表进行评估。结果:427名被试获得有效回答。由于低因子负荷或双重负荷,项目分析导致14个项目被排除。EFA确定了一个由21个项目组成的三因素结构:(1)处理信息的有意识行为,(2)适当的信息管理,(3)对信息泄露风险的反应。量表具有较强的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = .86)。标准相关效度与外部测量显著相关(rs = )。74, p 结论:《护士信息伦理行为评价量表》是一种简单、可靠、有效的评估护理实践中信息处理相关伦理行为的工具。它提供了一个道德自我评估的框架,可能有助于防止信息泄露和促进道德决策。进一步的研究应该调查数字素养和互联网特定道德能力的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信