Stem cell boost for immune effector cell associated hematotoxicity in multiple myeloma: minimizing long-term complications and expanding post CAR T-cell therapy relapse options.
{"title":"Stem cell boost for immune effector cell associated hematotoxicity in multiple myeloma: minimizing long-term complications and expanding post CAR T-cell therapy relapse options.","authors":"Meera Mohan, Carolina Schinke","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2570335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cytopenia is one of the most common adverse events after BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The term Immune Effector Cell Associated Hematotoxicity (ICAHT) was coined to describe the unique hematological toxicities following novel CAR T cell therapies. The management of prolonged ICAHT ( > 30 days) is quite challenging, and patients have high incidences of infections, require prolonged transfusion support and have an increased non-relapse mortality. Stem cell boost (SCB) leads to prompt and durable count recovery and can minimize long-term complications while enabling therapeutic options in the post CAR T-cell therapy relapse setting.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Herein we review current data on ICAHT, determine how SCB can lead to improved outcomes, and offer a view on future applications of SCB. The database 'pubmed' was searched for the terms 'CAR-T,' 'ICAHT', and 'Stem Cell', and results as well as selected citations were used for the present study.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>SCB for prolonged ICAHT improves morbidity and potentially mortality. Future use of SCB will depend on the long-term outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy in earlier treatment lines. For patients with high likelihood of ICAHT, prophylactive stem cell collection should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2570335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cytopenia is one of the most common adverse events after BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The term Immune Effector Cell Associated Hematotoxicity (ICAHT) was coined to describe the unique hematological toxicities following novel CAR T cell therapies. The management of prolonged ICAHT ( > 30 days) is quite challenging, and patients have high incidences of infections, require prolonged transfusion support and have an increased non-relapse mortality. Stem cell boost (SCB) leads to prompt and durable count recovery and can minimize long-term complications while enabling therapeutic options in the post CAR T-cell therapy relapse setting.
Areas covered: Herein we review current data on ICAHT, determine how SCB can lead to improved outcomes, and offer a view on future applications of SCB. The database 'pubmed' was searched for the terms 'CAR-T,' 'ICAHT', and 'Stem Cell', and results as well as selected citations were used for the present study.
Expert opinion: SCB for prolonged ICAHT improves morbidity and potentially mortality. Future use of SCB will depend on the long-term outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy in earlier treatment lines. For patients with high likelihood of ICAHT, prophylactive stem cell collection should be considered.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.