Enhancing Diagnostic Precision in Breast Cancer Detection: A Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Workshop Approach for Clinicians in the Southeast Asian Population.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Phuong Dung Yun Trieu, Oanh Tm Tran, Garvin Williamsz, Lam Le Ngo, Linh Thuy Nguyen, Due T Ong, Hao Thi Nguyen, Jenny O'Sullivan, Jillian Clarke, Melissa L Barron, Dania Abu Awwad, Sarah J Lewis
{"title":"Enhancing Diagnostic Precision in Breast Cancer Detection: A Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Workshop Approach for Clinicians in the Southeast Asian Population.","authors":"Phuong Dung Yun Trieu, Oanh Tm Tran, Garvin Williamsz, Lam Le Ngo, Linh Thuy Nguyen, Due T Ong, Hao Thi Nguyen, Jenny O'Sullivan, Jillian Clarke, Melissa L Barron, Dania Abu Awwad, Sarah J Lewis","doi":"10.1111/ajco.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) training workshops on doctors' performance in simultaneous-double-reader scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten pairs of Vietnamese readers, including radiologists, registrars, and breast physicians, participated in the workshop, which featured lectures and breast image reading sessions provided by Australian experts. The first session included a test set of 30 screening full-field digital mammograms (FFDM) (10 cancers and 20 normal cases) with DBT images provided during the answer review stage. The second session with 35 cases (15 cancer) and session 3 with 30 cases (11 cancer) consisted of screening FFDM mammograms, DBT slices, and synthesized images. Participants used the BREAST-VIETRAD platform to view breast images and detect cancer lesions using the RANZCR-BIRADS scale. The study assessed performance disparities between the first and second DBT sets using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and explored the correlation between score changes and reader experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant improvements in the readers' sensitivity (0.553 vs. 0.91; p = 0.005) and lesion sensitivity (0.419 vs. 0.709; p = 0.005) from the first to the second DBT set, matching the sensitivity seen in FFDM sets. This improvement was consistent across both low and high breast density cases. Notable enhancements in lesion sensitivity were also observed for detecting masses (0.340 vs. 0.633; p = 0.011), calcifications, and architectural distortions (0.450 vs. 0.933; p = 0.011). The probability of score improvement (ROC AUC and JAFROC FOM) in DBT of pairs of readers with both less than 3 years of experience in reading mammograms is five times greater than those with over 5 years of experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training sessions with simultaneous-double readers significantly improved Vietnamese clinicians' breast cancer detection capabilities, highlighting the importance of tailored educational programs to enhance diagnostic accuracy in regions lacking formal screening initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) training workshops on doctors' performance in simultaneous-double-reader scenarios.

Methods: Ten pairs of Vietnamese readers, including radiologists, registrars, and breast physicians, participated in the workshop, which featured lectures and breast image reading sessions provided by Australian experts. The first session included a test set of 30 screening full-field digital mammograms (FFDM) (10 cancers and 20 normal cases) with DBT images provided during the answer review stage. The second session with 35 cases (15 cancer) and session 3 with 30 cases (11 cancer) consisted of screening FFDM mammograms, DBT slices, and synthesized images. Participants used the BREAST-VIETRAD platform to view breast images and detect cancer lesions using the RANZCR-BIRADS scale. The study assessed performance disparities between the first and second DBT sets using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and explored the correlation between score changes and reader experience.

Results: There were significant improvements in the readers' sensitivity (0.553 vs. 0.91; p = 0.005) and lesion sensitivity (0.419 vs. 0.709; p = 0.005) from the first to the second DBT set, matching the sensitivity seen in FFDM sets. This improvement was consistent across both low and high breast density cases. Notable enhancements in lesion sensitivity were also observed for detecting masses (0.340 vs. 0.633; p = 0.011), calcifications, and architectural distortions (0.450 vs. 0.933; p = 0.011). The probability of score improvement (ROC AUC and JAFROC FOM) in DBT of pairs of readers with both less than 3 years of experience in reading mammograms is five times greater than those with over 5 years of experience.

Conclusions: Training sessions with simultaneous-double readers significantly improved Vietnamese clinicians' breast cancer detection capabilities, highlighting the importance of tailored educational programs to enhance diagnostic accuracy in regions lacking formal screening initiatives.

提高乳腺癌检测的诊断精度:东南亚临床医生的数字化乳房断层合成研讨会方法。
背景:本研究调查了数字乳房断层合成(DBT)培训研讨会对医生在同时双阅读器场景下的表现的影响。方法:十对越南读者,包括放射科医生、登记员和乳腺医生,参加了研讨会,其中包括由澳大利亚专家提供的讲座和乳房图像阅读课程。第一阶段包括一组30张全视野数字乳房x线照片(FFDM)(10例癌症和20例正常病例),在答案审查阶段提供DBT图像。第二阶段有35例(15例癌症),第三阶段有30例(11例癌症),包括筛查FFDM乳房x线照片、DBT切片和合成图像。参与者使用breast - vietrad平台查看乳房图像,并使用RANZCR-BIRADS量表检测癌症病变。本研究使用Wilcoxon sign Rank检验评估了第一组和第二组DBT之间的表现差异,并探讨了分数变化与读者体验之间的相关性。结果:从第一个DBT组到第二个DBT组,读者的灵敏度(0.553比0.91,p = 0.005)和病灶灵敏度(0.419比0.709,p = 0.005)有显著提高,与FFDM组的灵敏度相匹配。这种改善在低和高乳腺密度病例中都是一致的。病变敏感性也有显著提高,检测肿块(0.340 vs. 0.633, p = 0.011)、钙化和结构扭曲(0.450 vs. 0.933, p = 0.011)。阅读乳房x光片经验均不足3年的读者对DBT评分改善的概率(ROC AUC和JAFROC FOM)是具有5年以上经验的读者对DBT评分改善的概率的5倍。结论:使用双同步阅读器的培训课程显著提高了越南临床医生的乳腺癌检测能力,强调了在缺乏正式筛查举措的地区,量身定制的教育计划对于提高诊断准确性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信