The impact of urbanization on genetic connectivity of 10 mammal species in New Jersey

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Helen E. Chmura, Gretchen Fowles, Kristine L. Pilgrim, Jolene M. Strand, David M. Theobald, Katherine A. Zeller, Michael K. Schwartz
{"title":"The impact of urbanization on genetic connectivity of 10 mammal species in New Jersey","authors":"Helen E. Chmura,&nbsp;Gretchen Fowles,&nbsp;Kristine L. Pilgrim,&nbsp;Jolene M. Strand,&nbsp;David M. Theobald,&nbsp;Katherine A. Zeller,&nbsp;Michael K. Schwartz","doi":"10.1002/eap.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rapid human modification of landscapes around the world has made understanding how humans affect the genetic connectivity of wildlife populations urgent. The consistency of anthropogenic impact on genetic connectivity across taxa is unclear, in part because it is rare to have data representing functional connectivity for multiple taxa on the same landscape. We use microsatellite data for 10 mammalian species in New Jersey, USA, to assess cross-taxonomic patterns in the impact of urbanization on genetic connectivity. In doing so, we also evaluate the efficacy of species-specific and species-agnostic approaches for representing landscape resistance in landscape genetics analyses. We found relative consistency in the relationship between genetic connectivity and a resistance surface built using a species-agnostic index of human modification. High levels of human modification impeded genetic connectivity in 7/10 species. However, despite this relative consistency, for 7/10 species the highest performing resistance surfaces reflected a suite of variables individually tailored to each species' ecology, rather than species-agnostic representations of human infrastructure. Other land cover covariates, like forest, shrub, and herbaceous cover, consistently facilitated genetic connectivity. These results show that while human modification of the environment is important in explaining patterns of genetic connectivity across taxa, there is enough variation in how species respond to the suite of factors that define a landscape that functional connectivity is not always well represented by human modification alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid human modification of landscapes around the world has made understanding how humans affect the genetic connectivity of wildlife populations urgent. The consistency of anthropogenic impact on genetic connectivity across taxa is unclear, in part because it is rare to have data representing functional connectivity for multiple taxa on the same landscape. We use microsatellite data for 10 mammalian species in New Jersey, USA, to assess cross-taxonomic patterns in the impact of urbanization on genetic connectivity. In doing so, we also evaluate the efficacy of species-specific and species-agnostic approaches for representing landscape resistance in landscape genetics analyses. We found relative consistency in the relationship between genetic connectivity and a resistance surface built using a species-agnostic index of human modification. High levels of human modification impeded genetic connectivity in 7/10 species. However, despite this relative consistency, for 7/10 species the highest performing resistance surfaces reflected a suite of variables individually tailored to each species' ecology, rather than species-agnostic representations of human infrastructure. Other land cover covariates, like forest, shrub, and herbaceous cover, consistently facilitated genetic connectivity. These results show that while human modification of the environment is important in explaining patterns of genetic connectivity across taxa, there is enough variation in how species respond to the suite of factors that define a landscape that functional connectivity is not always well represented by human modification alone.

Abstract Image

城市化对新泽西州10种哺乳动物遗传连通性的影响
人类对世界各地景观的快速改变使得了解人类如何影响野生动物种群的遗传连通性变得迫在眉睫。人类活动对不同类群遗传连通性影响的一致性尚不清楚,部分原因是在同一景观中,很少有数据显示多个类群的功能连通性。本文利用美国新泽西州10种哺乳动物的微卫星数据,评估城市化对遗传连通性影响的跨分类模式。在此过程中,我们还评估了物种特异性和物种不可知论方法在景观遗传学分析中代表景观抗性的有效性。我们发现遗传连通性和利用人类修饰的物种不可知指数建立的抗性表面之间的关系相对一致。在7/10的物种中,高水平的人类修饰阻碍了遗传连通性。然而,尽管存在这种相对一致性,但对于7/10的物种来说,表现最好的抗性表面反映了为每个物种的生态量身定制的一系列变量,而不是人类基础设施的物种不可知表征。其他土地覆盖协变量,如森林、灌木和草本覆盖,始终促进遗传连通性。这些结果表明,虽然人类对环境的改造在解释不同分类群之间的遗传连通性模式方面很重要,但物种对定义景观的一系列因素的反应存在足够的差异,因此功能连通性并不总是仅由人类改造来很好地代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信