Net Fiscal Contributions in the EU—The Role of Indirect Taxation and In-Kind Benefits

IF 1.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Kyklos Pub Date : 2025-08-15 DOI:10.1111/kykl.70009
Michael Christl, Monika Köppl-Turyna
{"title":"Net Fiscal Contributions in the EU—The Role of Indirect Taxation and In-Kind Benefits","authors":"Michael Christl,&nbsp;Monika Köppl-Turyna","doi":"10.1111/kykl.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper extends the traditional concept of disposable income by including in-kind transfers for education and health as well as consumption taxes in the analysis. This extended view of tax–benefit systems offers a more comprehensive understanding of redistribution mechanisms within countries and facilitates cross-country comparisons. As a first step, our analysis identifies households as either net contributors or net beneficiaries based on this extended income concept. Our results show that there is considerable variability in net fiscal contributions across households, influenced by factors such as income level, household composition and age. We find that extending the income concept reduces the number of net contributor households, as the monetary effect of in-kind benefits outweighs the effect of consumption taxes paid. However, the number of net contributor households varies considerably across EU Member States. In a second step, we take a life-cycle perspective and estimate the contribution of each age cohort in each EU Member State. Our results show that individuals contribute very differently over the life cycle across Member States and that these contributions are highly correlated with individuals' retirement decisions. We show that corporatist welfare state regimes in particular tend to have low and even negative life-cycle contributions compared to universal welfare state systems and the Baltic insurance systems, with early retirement playing a crucial role in shaping these differences.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47739,"journal":{"name":"Kyklos","volume":"78 4","pages":"1607-1636"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyklos","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/kykl.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper extends the traditional concept of disposable income by including in-kind transfers for education and health as well as consumption taxes in the analysis. This extended view of tax–benefit systems offers a more comprehensive understanding of redistribution mechanisms within countries and facilitates cross-country comparisons. As a first step, our analysis identifies households as either net contributors or net beneficiaries based on this extended income concept. Our results show that there is considerable variability in net fiscal contributions across households, influenced by factors such as income level, household composition and age. We find that extending the income concept reduces the number of net contributor households, as the monetary effect of in-kind benefits outweighs the effect of consumption taxes paid. However, the number of net contributor households varies considerably across EU Member States. In a second step, we take a life-cycle perspective and estimate the contribution of each age cohort in each EU Member State. Our results show that individuals contribute very differently over the life cycle across Member States and that these contributions are highly correlated with individuals' retirement decisions. We show that corporatist welfare state regimes in particular tend to have low and even negative life-cycle contributions compared to universal welfare state systems and the Baltic insurance systems, with early retirement playing a crucial role in shaping these differences.

Abstract Image

欧盟的净财政贡献——间接税和实物收益的作用
本文扩展了传统的可支配收入概念,在分析中纳入了教育和医疗的实物转移以及消费税。这种对税收-福利制度的扩展观点有助于更全面地了解国家内部的再分配机制,并便于进行跨国比较。作为第一步,我们的分析根据这一扩展的收入概念将家庭确定为净贡献者或净受益者。我们的研究结果表明,受收入水平、家庭构成和年龄等因素的影响,不同家庭的净财政贡献存在相当大的差异。我们发现,扩大收入概念减少了净贡献者家庭的数量,因为实物福利的货币效应超过了所支付的消费税的效应。然而,净缴款家庭的数目在欧盟成员国之间差别很大。在第二步,我们采取生命周期的观点,并估计每个年龄队列在每个欧盟成员国的贡献。我们的研究结果表明,各个成员国的个人在整个生命周期中的贡献差异很大,这些贡献与个人的退休决定高度相关。我们表明,与普遍福利国家制度和波罗的海保险制度相比,社团主义福利国家制度的生命周期贡献尤其低,甚至为负,提前退休在形成这些差异方面起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kyklos
Kyklos ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: KYKLOS views economics as a social science and as such favours contributions dealing with issues relevant to contemporary society, as well as economic policy applications. Since its inception nearly 60 years ago, KYKLOS has earned a worldwide reputation for publishing a broad range of articles from international scholars on real world issues. KYKLOS encourages unorthodox, original approaches to topical economic and social issues with a multinational application, and promises to give fresh insights into topics of worldwide interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信