Assessing the Impact of Water Diversion on Hydrodynamics and Water Quality in the Upper Taihu Basin, China

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Suli Peng, Pan Wu, Zhili Wang, Kebing Chen, Zhi Dong, Yongjun Lu, Li Chen, Yan Lu
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Water Diversion on Hydrodynamics and Water Quality in the Upper Taihu Basin, China","authors":"Suli Peng,&nbsp;Pan Wu,&nbsp;Zhili Wang,&nbsp;Kebing Chen,&nbsp;Zhi Dong,&nbsp;Yongjun Lu,&nbsp;Li Chen,&nbsp;Yan Lu","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Owing to the substantial spatiotemporal variability and intricacy in the hydrodynamic and water quality responses to water diversion, the determination of impact on the aquatic environment has been predominantly qualitative. The quantitative assessment of the impact of anthropogenic activities (water diversion) on the aquatic environment has the potential to enhance the accuracy of a comprehensive benefit evaluation. The present study utilised hydrological data, encompassing flow rate (Q) and water quality index (WQI) in the lakes Taohu and Gehu basin (TGHs), from two typical water resource allocations in the Taihu basin. The study revealed how hydrodynamics and water quality in response to water diversion. Furthermore, it introduced the concept of “water diversion impact value” to quantify the impacts of water diversion on the aquatic environment. The results indicated when the overall water diversion effect showed enhancement in water quality, the WQI impact value was positive alongside a negative Q impact value (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>E</mi>\n <mi>WQI</mi>\n </msup>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>1.417</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msup>\n <mi>E</mi>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n </msup>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>14.2</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {E}^{WQI}=1.417,{E}^Q=-14.2\\ {\\mathrm{m}}^3/\\mathrm{s} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>); Conversely, when water diversion improved hydrodynamic conditions, the WQI impact value was negative accompanied by a larger positive Q impact value (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>E</mi>\n <mi>WQI</mi>\n </msup>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>3.17</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msup>\n <mi>E</mi>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n </msup>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>7.215</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {E}^{WQI}=-3.17,{E}^Q=7.215\\ {\\mathrm{m}}^3/\\mathrm{s} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>). Principal component analysis (PCA) further validated these results, demonstrating that prolonged and stable diversion was positively correlated with WQI, while short and fluctuating diversion was positively correlated with Q, thereby supporting the method of evaluating the effects of water diversion using impact values. In addition, the TGHs was divided into three distinct components: namely mainstream areas, tributary areas, and lake areas, in accordance with the respective hydrological compartment. The present study set out to explore the response mechanisms of three distinct hydrological compartments to water diversion. The findings revealed that the impact extremes predominantly occurred in the mainstream areas, exhibited minimal occurrence in lake areas, and manifested within the range between the two in tributary areas. The diversion impact value has been shown to be a reliable metric for evaluating the effects of water diversion, thereby providing substantial theoretical underpinnings for the enhancement of aquatic environments.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Owing to the substantial spatiotemporal variability and intricacy in the hydrodynamic and water quality responses to water diversion, the determination of impact on the aquatic environment has been predominantly qualitative. The quantitative assessment of the impact of anthropogenic activities (water diversion) on the aquatic environment has the potential to enhance the accuracy of a comprehensive benefit evaluation. The present study utilised hydrological data, encompassing flow rate (Q) and water quality index (WQI) in the lakes Taohu and Gehu basin (TGHs), from two typical water resource allocations in the Taihu basin. The study revealed how hydrodynamics and water quality in response to water diversion. Furthermore, it introduced the concept of “water diversion impact value” to quantify the impacts of water diversion on the aquatic environment. The results indicated when the overall water diversion effect showed enhancement in water quality, the WQI impact value was positive alongside a negative Q impact value ( E WQI = 1.417 , E Q = 14.2 m 3 / s $$ {E}^{WQI}=1.417,{E}^Q=-14.2\ {\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s} $$ ); Conversely, when water diversion improved hydrodynamic conditions, the WQI impact value was negative accompanied by a larger positive Q impact value ( E WQI = 3.17 , E Q = 7.215 m 3 / s $$ {E}^{WQI}=-3.17,{E}^Q=7.215\ {\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s} $$ ). Principal component analysis (PCA) further validated these results, demonstrating that prolonged and stable diversion was positively correlated with WQI, while short and fluctuating diversion was positively correlated with Q, thereby supporting the method of evaluating the effects of water diversion using impact values. In addition, the TGHs was divided into three distinct components: namely mainstream areas, tributary areas, and lake areas, in accordance with the respective hydrological compartment. The present study set out to explore the response mechanisms of three distinct hydrological compartments to water diversion. The findings revealed that the impact extremes predominantly occurred in the mainstream areas, exhibited minimal occurrence in lake areas, and manifested within the range between the two in tributary areas. The diversion impact value has been shown to be a reliable metric for evaluating the effects of water diversion, thereby providing substantial theoretical underpinnings for the enhancement of aquatic environments.

Abstract Image

太湖上游引水对水动力和水质的影响评价
由于引水对水动力和水质的响应具有很大的时空变异性和复杂性,对水环境影响的确定主要是定性的。定量评价人为活动(引水)对水环境的影响有可能提高综合效益评价的准确性。本研究利用太湖流域两种典型水资源配置的水文数据,包括太湖和葛湖流域(TGHs)的流量(Q)和水质指数(WQI)。研究揭示了水动力和水质对引水的响应。进一步引入“调水影响值”概念,量化调水对水环境的影响。结果表明,当整体引水效果表现为水质增强时,WQI影响值为正,Q影响值为负(E WQI = 1.417;E Q =−14.2 m3 / s $$ {E}^{WQI}=1.417,{E}^Q=-14.2\ {\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s} $$);反之,当引水改善水动力条件时,WQI影响值为负,同时Q的正影响值较大(E WQI = - 3.17,E Q = 7.215 m3 / s $$ {E}^{WQI}=-3.17,{E}^Q=7.215\ {\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s} $$)。主成分分析(PCA)进一步验证了上述结果,表明长时间稳定的引水与WQI呈正相关,短时间波动的引水与Q呈正相关,从而支持利用影响值评价引水效果的方法。此外,根据不同的水文区,将流域划分为干流区、支流区和湖泊区三个不同的组成部分。本研究旨在探讨三个不同的水文区对调水的响应机制。结果表明,极端影响主要发生在干流地区,湖泊地区的极端影响发生率最低,支流地区的极端影响表现在两者之间。引水影响值已被证明是评价引水效果的可靠指标,从而为改善水环境提供了重要的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信