A model-based assessment of anthropogenic disturbance on lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-10-05 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70361
Darin A. Kopp, John L. Stoddard, Philip R. Kaufmann, Alan T. Herlihy, Ryan A. Hill, Meredith M. Brehob, Robert D. Sabo
{"title":"A model-based assessment of anthropogenic disturbance on lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages","authors":"Darin A. Kopp,&nbsp;John L. Stoddard,&nbsp;Philip R. Kaufmann,&nbsp;Alan T. Herlihy,&nbsp;Ryan A. Hill,&nbsp;Meredith M. Brehob,&nbsp;Robert D. Sabo","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditionally, the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on biological assemblages are elucidated by comparing an assemblage observed at a site to one that represents a minimally disturbed state. Unfortunately, defining a minimally disturbed state is extremely challenging because of the extent of human disturbance. We use a national scale dataset and a model-based approach to assess how benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages at 1748 sites would change if common anthropogenic disturbances were removed from in-stream physiochemical variables. First, we used random forest models and current landscape data to predict physiochemical conditions and then infer abiotic condition in the absence of disturbance. Second, we combined these estimates with joint species distribution models to predict the assemblage that could occur in these undisturbed conditions. Random forest models explained 48%–75% of the variation in log-transformed total nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfate, chloride, and substrate diameter. Generally, nutrient and salinity concentrations were higher, and substrates were finer than predicted to be without disturbances. Using these physiochemical data, joint species distribution models, fitted to nine separate ecoregions, accurately explained genus richness (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.73–0.85) and composition (Jaccard similarity index = 0.48–0.55). Depending on the ecoregion, we found that genus richness could increase or decrease at 26%–61% of sites if disturbance was removed. For example, with anthropogenic disturbance, occurrence probabilities for Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera decreased at 5%–26% of sites, while occurrence probabilities for Mollusca and other noninsect, non-arthropod taxa increased at 5%–33% and 11%–24% of sites, respectively. Importantly, our innovative framework provides a foundation for evaluating the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on macroinvertebrate assemblages without identifying reference sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70361","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on biological assemblages are elucidated by comparing an assemblage observed at a site to one that represents a minimally disturbed state. Unfortunately, defining a minimally disturbed state is extremely challenging because of the extent of human disturbance. We use a national scale dataset and a model-based approach to assess how benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages at 1748 sites would change if common anthropogenic disturbances were removed from in-stream physiochemical variables. First, we used random forest models and current landscape data to predict physiochemical conditions and then infer abiotic condition in the absence of disturbance. Second, we combined these estimates with joint species distribution models to predict the assemblage that could occur in these undisturbed conditions. Random forest models explained 48%–75% of the variation in log-transformed total nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfate, chloride, and substrate diameter. Generally, nutrient and salinity concentrations were higher, and substrates were finer than predicted to be without disturbances. Using these physiochemical data, joint species distribution models, fitted to nine separate ecoregions, accurately explained genus richness (R2 = 0.73–0.85) and composition (Jaccard similarity index = 0.48–0.55). Depending on the ecoregion, we found that genus richness could increase or decrease at 26%–61% of sites if disturbance was removed. For example, with anthropogenic disturbance, occurrence probabilities for Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera decreased at 5%–26% of sites, while occurrence probabilities for Mollusca and other noninsect, non-arthropod taxa increased at 5%–33% and 11%–24% of sites, respectively. Importantly, our innovative framework provides a foundation for evaluating the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on macroinvertebrate assemblages without identifying reference sites.

Abstract Image

基于模型的大型无脊椎动物群落人为干扰评估
传统上,人为干扰对生物组合的影响是通过比较在一个地点观察到的组合与代表最小干扰状态的组合来阐明的。不幸的是,由于人为干扰的程度,定义最小干扰状态极具挑战性。我们使用一个国家尺度的数据集和基于模型的方法来评估1748个地点的底栖大型无脊椎动物群落在去除常见的人为干扰后的变化情况。首先,我们使用随机森林模型和当前景观数据来预测物理化学条件,然后在没有干扰的情况下推断非生物条件。其次,我们将这些估计与联合物种分布模型结合起来,预测在这些未受干扰的条件下可能发生的组合。随机森林模型解释了原木转化总氮、磷、硫酸盐、氯化物和基质直径的48%-75%的变化。一般来说,营养物和盐度浓度较高,基质比预测的更细,没有干扰。利用这些物化数据,拟合9个不同生态区的联合物种分布模型,准确解释了属丰富度(R2 = 0.73-0.85)和组成(Jaccard相似指数= 0.48-0.55)。根据不同的生态区域,在去除干扰后,26% ~ 61%的样点属丰富度可以增加或减少。例如,在人为干扰下,蜉蝣目、翼翅目和毛翅目的发生概率在5% ~ 26%之间下降,而软体动物和其他非昆虫、非节肢动物类群的发生概率分别在5% ~ 33%和11% ~ 24%之间增加。重要的是,我们的创新框架为在不确定参考位点的情况下评估人为干扰对大型无脊椎动物群落的影响提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信