A Framework for Quantifying the Robustness and Uncertainty of Drought Projections

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Shaobo Zhang, Zuhao Zhou, Yuqing Zhang, Peiyi Peng, Chongyu Xu
{"title":"A Framework for Quantifying the Robustness and Uncertainty of Drought Projections","authors":"Shaobo Zhang,&nbsp;Zuhao Zhou,&nbsp;Yuqing Zhang,&nbsp;Peiyi Peng,&nbsp;Chongyu Xu","doi":"10.1002/joc.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Drought may be exacerbated by global warming, but drought projections are largely inconsistent. The existing frameworks cannot adequately quantify the robustness and uncertainty of drought projections. Therefore, this study proposes a framework to solve this problem and verifies it in the Chinese Mainland. This framework consists of three main components: (1) the meteorological drought in the 21st century is projected using an impact propagation modelling chain; (2) the robustness of drought projections is quantified using Identical Trend Percentage (ITP) and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR); (3) the uncertainty of drought projections is investigated using improved multi-way analysis of variance. The study reveals that this framework can include more uncertainty sources, investigate the propagation patterns of uncertainty components and quantify the robustness of drought projections. The results show that drought projections are not robust. Specifically, the mean ITP ranges from 49% to 69%, indicating that nearly half of the projections display trends opposite to those of the mean values. In addition, the mean SNR of drought projections ranges between −0.36 and 0.15, with an absolute value far from 1.0. The dominant uncertainty source is the choice of drought index, of which the mean relative contribution ranges between 47% and 61%. When propagating along with the impact propagation modelling chain, the relative importance among existing uncertainty sources usually remains stable if no new physical quantities are joining in. If the relative importance among the existing uncertainty sources for one particular quantity is different from that for the other quantity, the relative importance among the existing uncertainty sources may be adjusted when the two quantities are pooled together by the newly joined processes. Excluding unreasonable drought indices generally reduces the uncertainty and improves the robustness of drought projections; however, it is insufficient to derive robust drought projections.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":"45 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drought may be exacerbated by global warming, but drought projections are largely inconsistent. The existing frameworks cannot adequately quantify the robustness and uncertainty of drought projections. Therefore, this study proposes a framework to solve this problem and verifies it in the Chinese Mainland. This framework consists of three main components: (1) the meteorological drought in the 21st century is projected using an impact propagation modelling chain; (2) the robustness of drought projections is quantified using Identical Trend Percentage (ITP) and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR); (3) the uncertainty of drought projections is investigated using improved multi-way analysis of variance. The study reveals that this framework can include more uncertainty sources, investigate the propagation patterns of uncertainty components and quantify the robustness of drought projections. The results show that drought projections are not robust. Specifically, the mean ITP ranges from 49% to 69%, indicating that nearly half of the projections display trends opposite to those of the mean values. In addition, the mean SNR of drought projections ranges between −0.36 and 0.15, with an absolute value far from 1.0. The dominant uncertainty source is the choice of drought index, of which the mean relative contribution ranges between 47% and 61%. When propagating along with the impact propagation modelling chain, the relative importance among existing uncertainty sources usually remains stable if no new physical quantities are joining in. If the relative importance among the existing uncertainty sources for one particular quantity is different from that for the other quantity, the relative importance among the existing uncertainty sources may be adjusted when the two quantities are pooled together by the newly joined processes. Excluding unreasonable drought indices generally reduces the uncertainty and improves the robustness of drought projections; however, it is insufficient to derive robust drought projections.

Abstract Image

一个量化干旱预测稳健性和不确定性的框架
全球变暖可能会加剧干旱,但对干旱的预测在很大程度上是不一致的。现有的框架不能充分量化干旱预测的稳健性和不确定性。因此,本研究提出了一个解决这一问题的框架,并在中国大陆进行了验证。该框架由三个主要部分组成:(1)利用影响传播模型链预估21世纪的气象干旱;(2)利用相同趋势百分比(ITP)和信噪比(SNR)量化干旱预测的稳健性;(3)采用改进的多向方差分析方法研究了干旱预测的不确定性。研究表明,该框架可以包括更多的不确定性源,研究不确定性成分的传播模式,并量化干旱预测的稳健性。结果表明,干旱预测并不稳健。具体来说,ITP的平均值在49%至69%之间,这表明近一半的预测显示出与平均值相反的趋势。干旱预估的平均信噪比在- 0.36 ~ 0.15之间,绝对值远低于1.0。主要的不确定性来源是干旱指数的选择,其平均相对贡献率在47% ~ 61%之间。当沿着冲击传播建模链传播时,如果没有新的物理量加入,则现有不确定性源之间的相对重要性通常保持稳定。如果一个特定数量的现有不确定性源之间的相对重要性不同于另一个数量,则可以在新加入的过程将两个数量汇集在一起时调整现有不确定性源之间的相对重要性。排除不合理的干旱指数通常会降低不确定性,提高干旱预测的稳健性;然而,要得出可靠的干旱预测是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信