Using Virtual Reality to Examine Officer Decision-Making in Police Co-Response Interactions

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Connor R. Powelson, Kyle D. McLean, Bryan Lee Miller
{"title":"Using Virtual Reality to Examine Officer Decision-Making in Police Co-Response Interactions","authors":"Connor R. Powelson,&nbsp;Kyle D. McLean,&nbsp;Bryan Lee Miller","doi":"10.1007/s12103-025-09831-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Policing mental health crises presents unique risks and challenges that require innovative strategies extending beyond traditional law enforcement approaches. Co-response models, which pair police officers with mental health clinicians, aim to address these challenges by integrating specialized expertise into crisis interventions. This study examines how officers make key decisions in integrating co-responders during mental health crises, such as determining the co-responder’s proximity to subjects, controlling access to critical information, and assigning specific roles during interventions. To investigate these decision-making processes, we employed virtual reality (VR) simulations, think-aloud protocols, and semi-structured interviews with police officers and a co-responder. Findings illustrate how officers balance safety and collaboration in policing situations, revealing how officers’ discretionary practices influence co-responders’ performance and program outcomes. Themes of authority, trust, and identity highlight both the potential for co-response models to de-escalate crises and the barriers imposed by traditional enforcement practices. Overcoming these barriers requires policies that clarify roles, collaborative training that build trust, and equitable integration that enhances coordination and community representation. Together, these measures can strengthen officers' ability to ensure safety while empowering co-responders to apply their expertise in crisis intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51509,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"50 5","pages":"822 - 847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12103-025-09831-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09831-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policing mental health crises presents unique risks and challenges that require innovative strategies extending beyond traditional law enforcement approaches. Co-response models, which pair police officers with mental health clinicians, aim to address these challenges by integrating specialized expertise into crisis interventions. This study examines how officers make key decisions in integrating co-responders during mental health crises, such as determining the co-responder’s proximity to subjects, controlling access to critical information, and assigning specific roles during interventions. To investigate these decision-making processes, we employed virtual reality (VR) simulations, think-aloud protocols, and semi-structured interviews with police officers and a co-responder. Findings illustrate how officers balance safety and collaboration in policing situations, revealing how officers’ discretionary practices influence co-responders’ performance and program outcomes. Themes of authority, trust, and identity highlight both the potential for co-response models to de-escalate crises and the barriers imposed by traditional enforcement practices. Overcoming these barriers requires policies that clarify roles, collaborative training that build trust, and equitable integration that enhances coordination and community representation. Together, these measures can strengthen officers' ability to ensure safety while empowering co-responders to apply their expertise in crisis intervention.

利用虚拟现实技术研究警察协同反应互动中的官员决策
心理健康危机的警务工作带来了独特的风险和挑战,需要超越传统执法方法的创新战略。共同应对模式将警察与心理健康临床医生配对,旨在通过将专业知识纳入危机干预措施来应对这些挑战。本研究探讨了在心理健康危机期间,官员如何在整合共同响应者方面做出关键决策,例如确定共同响应者与受试者的接近程度,控制对关键信息的获取,以及在干预期间分配特定角色。为了调查这些决策过程,我们采用了虚拟现实(VR)模拟、有声思考协议,并与警察和共同响应者进行了半结构化访谈。研究结果说明了警察如何在警务情况下平衡安全和协作,揭示了警察的自由裁量做法如何影响共同响应者的绩效和项目结果。权威、信任和身份的主题既强调了共同应对模式降低危机的潜力,也强调了传统执法做法带来的障碍。克服这些障碍需要明确角色的政策、建立信任的协作培训以及加强协调和社区代表性的公平整合。这些措施加在一起,可以加强警务人员确保安全的能力,同时使共同反应者能够运用他们在危机干预方面的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Criminal Justice
American Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Criminal Justice, the official journal of the Southern Criminal Justice Association, is a peer reviewed publication; manuscripts go through a blind review process. The focus of the Journal is on a wide array of criminal justice topics and issues. Some of these concerns include items pertaining to the criminal justice process, the formal and informal interplay between system components, problems and solutions experienced by various segments, innovative practices, policy development and implementation, evaluative research, the players engaged in these enterprises, and a wide assortment of other related interests. The American Journal of Criminal Justice publishes original articles that utilize a broad range of methodologies and perspectives when examining crime, law, and criminal justice processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信