Connor R. Powelson, Kyle D. McLean, Bryan Lee Miller
{"title":"Using Virtual Reality to Examine Officer Decision-Making in Police Co-Response Interactions","authors":"Connor R. Powelson, Kyle D. McLean, Bryan Lee Miller","doi":"10.1007/s12103-025-09831-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Policing mental health crises presents unique risks and challenges that require innovative strategies extending beyond traditional law enforcement approaches. Co-response models, which pair police officers with mental health clinicians, aim to address these challenges by integrating specialized expertise into crisis interventions. This study examines how officers make key decisions in integrating co-responders during mental health crises, such as determining the co-responder’s proximity to subjects, controlling access to critical information, and assigning specific roles during interventions. To investigate these decision-making processes, we employed virtual reality (VR) simulations, think-aloud protocols, and semi-structured interviews with police officers and a co-responder. Findings illustrate how officers balance safety and collaboration in policing situations, revealing how officers’ discretionary practices influence co-responders’ performance and program outcomes. Themes of authority, trust, and identity highlight both the potential for co-response models to de-escalate crises and the barriers imposed by traditional enforcement practices. Overcoming these barriers requires policies that clarify roles, collaborative training that build trust, and equitable integration that enhances coordination and community representation. Together, these measures can strengthen officers' ability to ensure safety while empowering co-responders to apply their expertise in crisis intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51509,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"50 5","pages":"822 - 847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12103-025-09831-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09831-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Policing mental health crises presents unique risks and challenges that require innovative strategies extending beyond traditional law enforcement approaches. Co-response models, which pair police officers with mental health clinicians, aim to address these challenges by integrating specialized expertise into crisis interventions. This study examines how officers make key decisions in integrating co-responders during mental health crises, such as determining the co-responder’s proximity to subjects, controlling access to critical information, and assigning specific roles during interventions. To investigate these decision-making processes, we employed virtual reality (VR) simulations, think-aloud protocols, and semi-structured interviews with police officers and a co-responder. Findings illustrate how officers balance safety and collaboration in policing situations, revealing how officers’ discretionary practices influence co-responders’ performance and program outcomes. Themes of authority, trust, and identity highlight both the potential for co-response models to de-escalate crises and the barriers imposed by traditional enforcement practices. Overcoming these barriers requires policies that clarify roles, collaborative training that build trust, and equitable integration that enhances coordination and community representation. Together, these measures can strengthen officers' ability to ensure safety while empowering co-responders to apply their expertise in crisis intervention.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Criminal Justice, the official journal of the Southern Criminal Justice Association, is a peer reviewed publication; manuscripts go through a blind review process. The focus of the Journal is on a wide array of criminal justice topics and issues. Some of these concerns include items pertaining to the criminal justice process, the formal and informal interplay between system components, problems and solutions experienced by various segments, innovative practices, policy development and implementation, evaluative research, the players engaged in these enterprises, and a wide assortment of other related interests. The American Journal of Criminal Justice publishes original articles that utilize a broad range of methodologies and perspectives when examining crime, law, and criminal justice processing.