Explainable Causal Graph‐based Method for Diagnosis and Root Cause Analysis in Process Systems

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Shuaihang Ji , Jinjiang Wang , Zheng Wang , Fengli Zhang
{"title":"Explainable Causal Graph‐based Method for Diagnosis and Root Cause Analysis in Process Systems","authors":"Shuaihang Ji ,&nbsp;Jinjiang Wang ,&nbsp;Zheng Wang ,&nbsp;Fengli Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing adoption of automation and intelligent maintenance has intensified the complexity of industrial process systems, characterized by high-dimensional nonlinear dynamics and tightly coupled multivariate interactions. This evolution exacerbates cross-level fault propagation patterns, necessitating precise anomaly pathway identification and root cause diagnosis for improving operational safety and reliability. This study proposes an interpretable root cause tracing framework for process systems based on causal graphs. A single-variable equivalent intervention evaluation model is developed to effectively screen critical fault indicators and implement extended convergent cross mapping for causal relationship extraction and abnormal causal graph modelling. In addition, redundancy detection and pruning strategies are designed to comprehensively reconstruct anomaly propagation pathways. Finally, the discriminant criteria of root cause variables are constructed through anomaly triggering and propagation analysis. A root cause variable traceability algorithm is proposed to improve diagnostic accuracy and mechanistic interpretability. Validated through the Tennessee Eastman process, the proposed method demonstrates superior performance in root cause identification and propagation path recognition within tightly coupled systems compared to conventional traceability methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107953"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025012200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing adoption of automation and intelligent maintenance has intensified the complexity of industrial process systems, characterized by high-dimensional nonlinear dynamics and tightly coupled multivariate interactions. This evolution exacerbates cross-level fault propagation patterns, necessitating precise anomaly pathway identification and root cause diagnosis for improving operational safety and reliability. This study proposes an interpretable root cause tracing framework for process systems based on causal graphs. A single-variable equivalent intervention evaluation model is developed to effectively screen critical fault indicators and implement extended convergent cross mapping for causal relationship extraction and abnormal causal graph modelling. In addition, redundancy detection and pruning strategies are designed to comprehensively reconstruct anomaly propagation pathways. Finally, the discriminant criteria of root cause variables are constructed through anomaly triggering and propagation analysis. A root cause variable traceability algorithm is proposed to improve diagnostic accuracy and mechanistic interpretability. Validated through the Tennessee Eastman process, the proposed method demonstrates superior performance in root cause identification and propagation path recognition within tightly coupled systems compared to conventional traceability methodologies.
基于可解释因果图的过程系统诊断和根本原因分析方法
自动化和智能维护的日益普及加剧了工业过程系统的复杂性,其特点是高维非线性动力学和紧密耦合的多元相互作用。这种演变加剧了跨层故障传播模式,需要精确的异常路径识别和根本原因诊断,以提高运行安全性和可靠性。本研究提出一种基于因果图的流程系统可解释的根本原因追踪框架。为了有效筛选关键故障指标,建立了单变量等效干预评价模型,并对因果关系提取和异常因果图建模进行了扩展收敛交叉映射。设计冗余检测和剪枝策略,全面重构异常传播路径。最后,通过异常触发和传播分析,构造了根本原因变量的判别准则。为了提高诊断的准确性和机制可解释性,提出了一种根因变量溯源算法。通过田纳西伊士曼过程验证,与传统的可追溯性方法相比,所提出的方法在紧耦合系统中的根本原因识别和传播路径识别方面表现出优越的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信