Mélissa Caza , Cherie Tantichalermsin , Sherry Gonzales , Catherine A. Hogan , David Su , Jennifer Grant , Amanda Wilmer
{"title":"Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® Gastrointestinal Panel 2 for detection of viral, bacterial and parasitic pathogens in fecal swab specimens","authors":"Mélissa Caza , Cherie Tantichalermsin , Sherry Gonzales , Catherine A. Hogan , David Su , Jennifer Grant , Amanda Wilmer","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the performance of the QIAstat-Dx® gastrointestinal panel 2 (GIP2) (Qiagen, Spain) for the gastrointestinal pathogens from Fecalswab® specimens (Copan, Italy). For most targets, specimens were tested initially on the Allplex<sup>TM</sup> GI assays (Seegene, South Korea). For <em>P. shigelloides</em>, specimens were initially tested on BIOFIRE® GI Panel (BGIP) (bioMérieux, France). Two hundred fifty-nine specimens were tested on the GIP2 (69.5 % archived, 30.5 % prospective). Specimens with discordant results on Allplex<sup>TM</sup> GI assays were tested on BGIP or Xpert® Norovirus (Cepheid, USA), while discordant results for P<em>. shigelloides</em> were tested by culture. Consensus results were obtained based on agreement of at least 2 of 3 tests. The percent positive and negative agreement (PPA, PNA) were calculated on a per target basis. Compared to consensus, GIP2 PPA was 95.02 % (95 % CI 91.78 – 97.25 %) and PNA was 99.98 % (95 % CI 99.90- 100.00 %). GIP2 performed well for bacterial and parasitic targets with PPA and PNA >97 %, however had a PPA of 88.3 % (95 % CI 80-81 – 93.61 %) and PNA of 100.0 % (95 % CI 99.75 – 100.00 %) for viral targets. When CT values were examined, QIAstat-dx GIP2 produce similar values to the Allplex<sup>TM</sup> GI-viral assay. However, bacterial and parasitic targets on QIAstat-dx GIP2 trends towards lower CT values when compared to the Allplex<sup>TM</sup> GI assays.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"114 2","pages":"Article 117129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325004511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of the QIAstat-Dx® gastrointestinal panel 2 (GIP2) (Qiagen, Spain) for the gastrointestinal pathogens from Fecalswab® specimens (Copan, Italy). For most targets, specimens were tested initially on the AllplexTM GI assays (Seegene, South Korea). For P. shigelloides, specimens were initially tested on BIOFIRE® GI Panel (BGIP) (bioMérieux, France). Two hundred fifty-nine specimens were tested on the GIP2 (69.5 % archived, 30.5 % prospective). Specimens with discordant results on AllplexTM GI assays were tested on BGIP or Xpert® Norovirus (Cepheid, USA), while discordant results for P. shigelloides were tested by culture. Consensus results were obtained based on agreement of at least 2 of 3 tests. The percent positive and negative agreement (PPA, PNA) were calculated on a per target basis. Compared to consensus, GIP2 PPA was 95.02 % (95 % CI 91.78 – 97.25 %) and PNA was 99.98 % (95 % CI 99.90- 100.00 %). GIP2 performed well for bacterial and parasitic targets with PPA and PNA >97 %, however had a PPA of 88.3 % (95 % CI 80-81 – 93.61 %) and PNA of 100.0 % (95 % CI 99.75 – 100.00 %) for viral targets. When CT values were examined, QIAstat-dx GIP2 produce similar values to the AllplexTM GI-viral assay. However, bacterial and parasitic targets on QIAstat-dx GIP2 trends towards lower CT values when compared to the AllplexTM GI assays.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.