{"title":"Transitioning from conventional to optimized green solar-powered post-combustion carbon capture: A comprehensive life cycle assessment","authors":"Alireza Namdar Zangeneh , Farzin Hosseinifard , Mohsen Salimi , Amir Farhang Sotoodeh , Majid Amidpour","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) is essential for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from fossil-fuel-based power generation, but its high energy demands raise important environmental concerns. This study evaluates the environmental performance of seven diglycolamine (DGA)-based PCC configurations implemented in a natural gas combined cycle power plant, using the ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) method in SimaPro. Configurations include six entirely plant-powered designs and one solar-powered system. The Lean Vapor Compression (LVC) configuration achieved the best overall performance, reducing the total impact score by 48 % compared to the Standard configuration (from 3.38 to 1.75 milliPoints per kilowatt-hour, mPt/kWh, where mPt reflects a share of the annual environmental burden of an average global citizen). The solar-powered Two Stage Flash (TSF) also performed well (1.91 mPt/kWh), though with notable trade-offs. Both LVC and TSF reduced global warming-related human health impacts by over 50 % (from 1.45 × 10<sup>−7</sup> to ∼ 7.0 × 10<sup>−8</sup> DALY/kWh, with DALY representing years of healthy life lost due to environmental damage) and significantly lowered fossil resource scarcity (more than 60 %). LVC achieved the lowest fine particulate matter, water consumption, and human toxicity impacts, reduced by 41 %, 63 % and 40 % respectively. However, TSF performs poorly in those categories due to solar infrastructure impacts. Steam and electricity use were major contributors in most systems, with the reboiler and stripper identified as environmental hotspots.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 104140"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245190492500931X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) is essential for reducing CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel-based power generation, but its high energy demands raise important environmental concerns. This study evaluates the environmental performance of seven diglycolamine (DGA)-based PCC configurations implemented in a natural gas combined cycle power plant, using the ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) method in SimaPro. Configurations include six entirely plant-powered designs and one solar-powered system. The Lean Vapor Compression (LVC) configuration achieved the best overall performance, reducing the total impact score by 48 % compared to the Standard configuration (from 3.38 to 1.75 milliPoints per kilowatt-hour, mPt/kWh, where mPt reflects a share of the annual environmental burden of an average global citizen). The solar-powered Two Stage Flash (TSF) also performed well (1.91 mPt/kWh), though with notable trade-offs. Both LVC and TSF reduced global warming-related human health impacts by over 50 % (from 1.45 × 10−7 to ∼ 7.0 × 10−8 DALY/kWh, with DALY representing years of healthy life lost due to environmental damage) and significantly lowered fossil resource scarcity (more than 60 %). LVC achieved the lowest fine particulate matter, water consumption, and human toxicity impacts, reduced by 41 %, 63 % and 40 % respectively. However, TSF performs poorly in those categories due to solar infrastructure impacts. Steam and electricity use were major contributors in most systems, with the reboiler and stripper identified as environmental hotspots.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.