Towards early detection of algorithmic bias from dataset’s bias symptoms: An empirical study

IF 4.3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Giordano d’Aloisio, Claudio Di Sipio, Antinisca Di Marco, Davide Di Ruscio
{"title":"Towards early detection of algorithmic bias from dataset’s bias symptoms: An empirical study","authors":"Giordano d’Aloisio,&nbsp;Claudio Di Sipio,&nbsp;Antinisca Di Marco,&nbsp;Davide Di Ruscio","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>The rise of AI software has made fairness auditing essential, particularly where biased decisions have serious impacts. This entails identifying sensitive variables and calculating fairness metrics based on predictions from a baseline model. Since model training is computationally intensive, recent research focuses on early bias assessment to detect bias before extensive training starts.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>This paper presents an empirical study to evaluate how dataset statistics, named <em>bias symptoms</em>, can assist in the early identification of variables that may lead to bias in the system. The aim of this study is to avoid training a machine learning model before assessing – and, in case, mitigating – its bias, thus increasing the sustainability of the development process.</div></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><div>We first identify a <em>bias symptoms</em> dataset, employing 24 datasets from diverse application domains commonly used in fairness auditing. Through extensive empirical analysis, we investigate the ability of these <em>bias symptoms</em> to predict variables associated with bias under three fairness definitions.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Our results demonstrate that <em>bias symptoms</em> are effective in supporting early predictions of bias-inducing variables under specific fairness definitions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>These findings offer valuable insights for practitioners and researchers, encouraging further exploration in developing methods for proactive bias mitigation involving bias symptoms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 107905"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584925002447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context:

The rise of AI software has made fairness auditing essential, particularly where biased decisions have serious impacts. This entails identifying sensitive variables and calculating fairness metrics based on predictions from a baseline model. Since model training is computationally intensive, recent research focuses on early bias assessment to detect bias before extensive training starts.

Objective:

This paper presents an empirical study to evaluate how dataset statistics, named bias symptoms, can assist in the early identification of variables that may lead to bias in the system. The aim of this study is to avoid training a machine learning model before assessing – and, in case, mitigating – its bias, thus increasing the sustainability of the development process.

Method:

We first identify a bias symptoms dataset, employing 24 datasets from diverse application domains commonly used in fairness auditing. Through extensive empirical analysis, we investigate the ability of these bias symptoms to predict variables associated with bias under three fairness definitions.

Results:

Our results demonstrate that bias symptoms are effective in supporting early predictions of bias-inducing variables under specific fairness definitions.

Conclusion:

These findings offer valuable insights for practitioners and researchers, encouraging further exploration in developing methods for proactive bias mitigation involving bias symptoms.
基于数据集偏差症状的算法偏差早期检测:一项实证研究
背景:人工智能软件的兴起使得公平审计变得至关重要,尤其是在有偏见的决策产生严重影响的情况下。这需要识别敏感变量并基于基线模型的预测计算公平性指标。由于模型训练是计算密集型的,最近的研究集中在早期偏差评估上,以便在广泛的训练开始之前发现偏差。目的:本文提出了一项实证研究,以评估数据集统计(称为偏差症状)如何帮助早期识别可能导致系统偏差的变量。本研究的目的是避免在评估机器学习模型之前对其进行训练,并在这种情况下减轻其偏见,从而增加开发过程的可持续性。方法:我们首先确定一个偏见症状数据集,使用来自公平性审计中常用的不同应用领域的24个数据集。通过广泛的实证分析,我们研究了这些偏见症状在三种公平定义下预测与偏见相关变量的能力。结果:我们的研究结果表明,偏见症状在支持特定公平定义下偏见诱发变量的早期预测方面是有效的。结论:这些发现为从业者和研究人员提供了有价值的见解,鼓励进一步探索开发包括偏倚症状的主动偏倚缓解方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信