Evaluation of resistivity attenuation models in geotechnical media with penetration depth

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zhijie Li , Ya Chu , Guojun Cai , Chao Yan , Songyu Liu , Aimin Han
{"title":"Evaluation of resistivity attenuation models in geotechnical media with penetration depth","authors":"Zhijie Li ,&nbsp;Ya Chu ,&nbsp;Guojun Cai ,&nbsp;Chao Yan ,&nbsp;Songyu Liu ,&nbsp;Aimin Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The electrical resistivity of geotechnical materials effectively characterizes their physicochemical properties and structural features. The commonly used four-electrode method minimizes the effects of electrode polarization and contact resistance. However, it requires electrode insertion into the soil, which may disturb the sample structure and affect measurements. Variations in probe depth also lead to different current field attenuations, impacting resistivity results. Additionally, this method is unsuitable for hard geomaterials. To address these issues, this study analyzes the four-electrode testing principle and conducts penetration depth-resistivity experiments on sandy and cohesive soils. It investigates how resistivity varies with probe depth and establishes a depth-based attenuation model. Results show that increasing penetration depth reduces current attenuation, causing resistivity to increase, with a generally linear relationship observed. Water content and dry density also affect resistivity trends. The study further explores the influence of moisture, dry density, and soil type on electrical conductivity with penetration depth. A multivariate nonlinear regression model is developed to describe resistivity attenuation based on water content and dry density. An exponential relationship between resistivity growth rate and penetration depth is used to define a minimum effective depth. Based on this, a surface-to-internal (<em>S</em>-<em>I</em>) resistivity conversion model is proposed and validated. These findings demonstrate that the results are applicable to soft geomaterials such as sandy soil and kaolin, achieving the purpose of predicting the internal resistivity of geomaterials based on their fundamental state parameters and surface resistivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","volume":"243 ","pages":"Article 105957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926985125003386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electrical resistivity of geotechnical materials effectively characterizes their physicochemical properties and structural features. The commonly used four-electrode method minimizes the effects of electrode polarization and contact resistance. However, it requires electrode insertion into the soil, which may disturb the sample structure and affect measurements. Variations in probe depth also lead to different current field attenuations, impacting resistivity results. Additionally, this method is unsuitable for hard geomaterials. To address these issues, this study analyzes the four-electrode testing principle and conducts penetration depth-resistivity experiments on sandy and cohesive soils. It investigates how resistivity varies with probe depth and establishes a depth-based attenuation model. Results show that increasing penetration depth reduces current attenuation, causing resistivity to increase, with a generally linear relationship observed. Water content and dry density also affect resistivity trends. The study further explores the influence of moisture, dry density, and soil type on electrical conductivity with penetration depth. A multivariate nonlinear regression model is developed to describe resistivity attenuation based on water content and dry density. An exponential relationship between resistivity growth rate and penetration depth is used to define a minimum effective depth. Based on this, a surface-to-internal (S-I) resistivity conversion model is proposed and validated. These findings demonstrate that the results are applicable to soft geomaterials such as sandy soil and kaolin, achieving the purpose of predicting the internal resistivity of geomaterials based on their fundamental state parameters and surface resistivity.
岩土介质中随侵彻深度的电阻率衰减模型评价
土工材料的电阻率能有效表征其物理化学性质和结构特征。常用的四电极法最大限度地减少了电极极化和接触电阻的影响。然而,它需要电极插入到土壤中,这可能会扰乱样品结构并影响测量。探头深度的变化也会导致电流场衰减的不同,影响电阻率的结果。此外,该方法不适用于硬质岩土材料。针对这些问题,本研究分析了四电极测试原理,并在砂质土和粘性土上进行了渗透深度电阻率实验。研究了电阻率随探测深度的变化规律,建立了基于深度的衰减模型。结果表明,随着侵彻深度的增加,电流衰减减小,电阻率增大,且大体上呈线性关系。含水量和干密度也影响电阻率趋势。进一步探讨了水分、干密度和土壤类型对电导率随渗透深度的影响。建立了基于含水率和干密度的电阻率衰减多元非线性回归模型。电阻率增长率与穿透深度之间的指数关系用于确定最小有效深度。在此基础上,提出并验证了地表-内部(S-I)电阻率转换模型。研究结果表明,该方法适用于砂土、高岭土等软质土工材料,实现了基于土工材料基本状态参数和表面电阻率预测土工材料内部电阻率的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geophysics
Journal of Applied Geophysics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Geophysics with its key objective of responding to pertinent and timely needs, places particular emphasis on methodological developments and innovative applications of geophysical techniques for addressing environmental, engineering, and hydrological problems. Related topical research in exploration geophysics and in soil and rock physics is also covered by the Journal of Applied Geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信