{"title":"Are older women with early-stage endometrial cancer undertreated and more likely to die from their cancer?","authors":"Jeremy Barben , Ariane Mamguem Kamga , Adrien Guilloteau , Valerie Quipourt , Leila Bengrine-Lefevre , Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo-Yonli","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries, mainly affecting older women and raising concerns about potential under-treatment. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns and assess net survival in older women with early-stage endometrial cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This French retrospective observational study used a gynecological cancer registry. Patients diagnosed with FIGO I-II endometrial cancer from 1998 to 2018 were included and stratified by age (a younger group, under 70 years, and an older group, aged 70 years or more). A multiple penalized splines model was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 828 patients were included: 448 women aged under 70 and 380 aged 70 or more. Older patients belonged to higher-risk groups as defined by ESGO-ESTRO-ESP 2021 criteria (<em>p</em> < 0.001) and had a lower rate of low-grade endometrioid carcinoma (75.1 % vs. 85.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.003). Treatment patterns did not differ by age; surgery plus adjuvant therapy remained the main treatment (69.7 % vs. 70.8 % in the older and younger groups, respectively, <em>p</em> = 0.87). 5-year net survival was 95.0 % (95 % CI: 92.6–97.6) for younger and 84.3 % (95 % CI: 78.8–90.3) for older women. The univariate hazard ratio for death in older vs. younger women was 2.38 (95 % CI: 1.19–4.74; <em>p</em> = 0.02). Multivariate analysis attenuated age's effect: hazard ratio 1.38 (95 % CI: 0.97–3.31; <em>p</em> = 0.06). Charlson Comorbidity Index and non-low-grade endometrioid histology predicted poorer survival. Diagnosis period was not associated with survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No significant difference in treatment was found according to age. Although age was associated with 5-year net survival in univariate analysis, this association was no longer observed after adjusting for diagnosis period, comorbidities, and histology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51120,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 108741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maturitas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512225005493","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries, mainly affecting older women and raising concerns about potential under-treatment. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns and assess net survival in older women with early-stage endometrial cancer.
Study design
This French retrospective observational study used a gynecological cancer registry. Patients diagnosed with FIGO I-II endometrial cancer from 1998 to 2018 were included and stratified by age (a younger group, under 70 years, and an older group, aged 70 years or more). A multiple penalized splines model was used.
Results
A total of 828 patients were included: 448 women aged under 70 and 380 aged 70 or more. Older patients belonged to higher-risk groups as defined by ESGO-ESTRO-ESP 2021 criteria (p < 0.001) and had a lower rate of low-grade endometrioid carcinoma (75.1 % vs. 85.7 %, p = 0.003). Treatment patterns did not differ by age; surgery plus adjuvant therapy remained the main treatment (69.7 % vs. 70.8 % in the older and younger groups, respectively, p = 0.87). 5-year net survival was 95.0 % (95 % CI: 92.6–97.6) for younger and 84.3 % (95 % CI: 78.8–90.3) for older women. The univariate hazard ratio for death in older vs. younger women was 2.38 (95 % CI: 1.19–4.74; p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis attenuated age's effect: hazard ratio 1.38 (95 % CI: 0.97–3.31; p = 0.06). Charlson Comorbidity Index and non-low-grade endometrioid histology predicted poorer survival. Diagnosis period was not associated with survival.
Conclusion
No significant difference in treatment was found according to age. Although age was associated with 5-year net survival in univariate analysis, this association was no longer observed after adjusting for diagnosis period, comorbidities, and histology.
期刊介绍:
Maturitas is an international multidisciplinary peer reviewed scientific journal of midlife health and beyond publishing original research, reviews, consensus statements and guidelines, and mini-reviews. The journal provides a forum for all aspects of postreproductive health in both genders ranging from basic science to health and social care.
Topic areas include:• Aging• Alternative and Complementary medicines• Arthritis and Bone Health• Cancer• Cardiovascular Health• Cognitive and Physical Functioning• Epidemiology, health and social care• Gynecology/ Reproductive Endocrinology• Nutrition/ Obesity Diabetes/ Metabolic Syndrome• Menopause, Ovarian Aging• Mental Health• Pharmacology• Sexuality• Quality of Life