Cognitive Functions Supporting Learning Over Time in Naming Treatment for Aphasia.

IF 2.2
Emily B Goldberg, William D Hula, Robert Cavanaugh, Alexander M Swiderski, Alyssa Autenreith, Michael Walsh Dickey
{"title":"Cognitive Functions Supporting Learning Over Time in Naming Treatment for Aphasia.","authors":"Emily B Goldberg, William D Hula, Robert Cavanaugh, Alexander M Swiderski, Alyssa Autenreith, Michael Walsh Dickey","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aphasia rehabilitation is a learning process that unfolds over time. Previous group studies have examined aphasia treatment response using pre- to posttreatment comparison, largely ignoring the unfolding learning response that occurs session-to-session. We aimed to (a) characterize the shape of learning while individuals with aphasia received intensive anomia intervention and (b) identify the cognitive predictors of this learning response.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals (<i>N</i> = 39) with chronic poststroke aphasia received intensive semantic feature analysis (SFA). Naming accuracy for trained and semantically related, untrained words was probed daily. We used Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects models to estimate the shape of learning during SFA treatment and to measure the influence of key cognitive functions on treatment response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most treatment gains appeared early during treatment, after the first 4 hr of intervention. Verbal recognition and visuospatial memory were associated with the magnitude of those early treatment gains, favoring strong cognitive performers. Treatment generalization to untrained targets was present but modest, with some evidence suggesting that visuospatial recall performance may be associated with treatment generalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Monitoring SFA treatment response early could help inform clinicians whether patients will respond optimally to intervention. Verbal recognition and visuospatial recall support learning during treatment, helping elucidate cognitive underpinnings of learning during aphasia rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30213520.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Aphasia rehabilitation is a learning process that unfolds over time. Previous group studies have examined aphasia treatment response using pre- to posttreatment comparison, largely ignoring the unfolding learning response that occurs session-to-session. We aimed to (a) characterize the shape of learning while individuals with aphasia received intensive anomia intervention and (b) identify the cognitive predictors of this learning response.

Method: Individuals (N = 39) with chronic poststroke aphasia received intensive semantic feature analysis (SFA). Naming accuracy for trained and semantically related, untrained words was probed daily. We used Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects models to estimate the shape of learning during SFA treatment and to measure the influence of key cognitive functions on treatment response.

Results: Most treatment gains appeared early during treatment, after the first 4 hr of intervention. Verbal recognition and visuospatial memory were associated with the magnitude of those early treatment gains, favoring strong cognitive performers. Treatment generalization to untrained targets was present but modest, with some evidence suggesting that visuospatial recall performance may be associated with treatment generalization.

Conclusions: Monitoring SFA treatment response early could help inform clinicians whether patients will respond optimally to intervention. Verbal recognition and visuospatial recall support learning during treatment, helping elucidate cognitive underpinnings of learning during aphasia rehabilitation.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30213520.

失语症命名治疗的认知功能支持学习。
目的:失语康复是一个学习的过程,随着时间的推移而展开。先前的小组研究使用治疗前和治疗后的比较来检查失语症治疗反应,在很大程度上忽略了发生在会话到会话的展开学习反应。我们的目的是(a)表征失语症患者接受强化失语症干预时的学习形态,(b)确定这种学习反应的认知预测因素。方法:对39例脑卒中后慢性失语症患者进行强化语义特征分析(SFA)。每天对训练过的和语义相关的、未训练过的词的命名准确性进行检测。我们使用贝叶斯广义线性混合效应模型来估计SFA治疗期间的学习形状,并测量关键认知功能对治疗反应的影响。结果:大多数治疗效果出现在治疗早期,在干预的前4小时之后。言语识别和视觉空间记忆与这些早期治疗收益的大小有关,有利于认知能力强的人。对未训练目标的治疗泛化存在,但不明显,一些证据表明视觉空间回忆表现可能与治疗泛化有关。结论:早期监测SFA治疗反应可以帮助临床医生了解患者是否对干预反应最佳。言语识别和视觉空间回忆支持治疗期间的学习,有助于阐明失语症康复期间学习的认知基础。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30213520。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信