Estimating muscle forces in patients with cerebral palsy during walking using static optimization and computed muscle control.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Alina Nawab Kidwai, Kerim Atmaca, Ergin Tönük, Yunus Ziya Arslan
{"title":"Estimating muscle forces in patients with cerebral palsy during walking using static optimization and computed muscle control.","authors":"Alina Nawab Kidwai, Kerim Atmaca, Ergin Tönük, Yunus Ziya Arslan","doi":"10.1115/1.4070037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of neurological disorders that presents significant challenges for clinical rehabilitation. While muscle forces could aid clinical decision-making, direct in-vivo measurement is infeasible and ethically questionable. Consequently, model-based methods such as static optimization (SO) and computed muscle control (CMC) have gained attention. Although SO and CMC have been compared for healthy individuals, it remains uncertain whether one approach yields more accurate predictions across varying severities of crouch gait in CP. We evaluated SO and CMC using OpenSim to estimate muscle forces and activations from an openly available dataset with delineations based on crouch severity. Predicted muscle activations were validated against experimental EMG data using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE), while joint moment tracking was assessed using reserve moments. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the influence of tendon slack length on force predictions. Results showed that while CMC predicted generally higher muscle forces than SO, both methods yielded variable ρ values (-0.7 to 0.9) and RMSEs (0.14 to 0.7) across muscle groups and crouch severities. ρSO was significantly higher than ?CMC for the medial hamstrings, and crouch severity significantly influenced the ρ difference between methods for the lateral hamstrings and rectus femoris. However, RMSEs did not consistently reflect these trends. CMC was more sensitive to tendon slack length variations. Overall, neither method currently provides sufficiently validated muscle force estimates for clinical application in CP, emphasizing the need for further methodological refinement.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4070037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of neurological disorders that presents significant challenges for clinical rehabilitation. While muscle forces could aid clinical decision-making, direct in-vivo measurement is infeasible and ethically questionable. Consequently, model-based methods such as static optimization (SO) and computed muscle control (CMC) have gained attention. Although SO and CMC have been compared for healthy individuals, it remains uncertain whether one approach yields more accurate predictions across varying severities of crouch gait in CP. We evaluated SO and CMC using OpenSim to estimate muscle forces and activations from an openly available dataset with delineations based on crouch severity. Predicted muscle activations were validated against experimental EMG data using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE), while joint moment tracking was assessed using reserve moments. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the influence of tendon slack length on force predictions. Results showed that while CMC predicted generally higher muscle forces than SO, both methods yielded variable ρ values (-0.7 to 0.9) and RMSEs (0.14 to 0.7) across muscle groups and crouch severities. ρSO was significantly higher than ?CMC for the medial hamstrings, and crouch severity significantly influenced the ρ difference between methods for the lateral hamstrings and rectus femoris. However, RMSEs did not consistently reflect these trends. CMC was more sensitive to tendon slack length variations. Overall, neither method currently provides sufficiently validated muscle force estimates for clinical application in CP, emphasizing the need for further methodological refinement.

使用静态优化和计算肌肉控制估计脑瘫患者行走时的肌肉力量。
脑瘫(CP)是一组神经系统疾病,对临床康复提出了重大挑战。虽然肌肉力量可以帮助临床决策,但直接在体内测量是不可行的,而且在伦理上存在问题。因此,基于模型的方法如静态优化(SO)和计算肌肉控制(CMC)得到了关注。尽管已经对健康个体的SO和CMC进行了比较,但仍不确定是否有一种方法可以更准确地预测CP中不同程度的蹲下步态。我们使用OpenSim评估了SO和CMC,以估计基于蹲下严重程度的公开可用数据集的肌肉力量和激活。预测的肌肉激活使用Spearman的秩相关系数(ρ)和均方根误差(RMSE)根据实验肌电图数据进行验证,而关节力矩跟踪使用储备力矩进行评估。进行了敏感性分析,以检验肌腱松弛长度对力预测的影响。结果表明,虽然CMC预测的肌肉力量普遍高于SO,但两种方法在肌肉群和蹲伏严重程度上都得到了可变的ρ值(-0.7至0.9)和rmse(0.14至0.7)。ρSO显著高于?内侧腘绳肌CMC和蹲伏严重程度显著影响外侧腘绳肌和股直肌方法的ρ值差异。然而,均方根误差并没有一致地反映这些趋势。CMC对肌腱松弛长度变化更为敏感。总的来说,这两种方法目前都不能为CP的临床应用提供充分验证的肌肉力量估计,强调需要进一步改进方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信