Implementing a multilevel, multicomponent intervention to engage fathers in complementary feeding in Northern Nigeria: Perceptions of deliverers and recipients.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-10-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005214
Diana Allotey, Valerie L Flax, Abiodun F Ipadeola, Sarah Kwasu, Beamlak Worku, Keerti Kalluru, Rami Imam, Angela M Stover, Sujata Bose, Stephanie L Martin
{"title":"Implementing a multilevel, multicomponent intervention to engage fathers in complementary feeding in Northern Nigeria: Perceptions of deliverers and recipients.","authors":"Diana Allotey, Valerie L Flax, Abiodun F Ipadeola, Sarah Kwasu, Beamlak Worku, Keerti Kalluru, Rami Imam, Angela M Stover, Sujata Bose, Stephanie L Martin","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0005214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Alive & Thrive multilevel, multicomponent intervention to engage fathers in complementary feeding in Kaduna State, Nigeria previously showed significant increases in complementary feeding practices for children. This analysis explores the perceptions of intervention deliverers and recipients to inform future spread. The intervention components included counseling cards, home visits, feeding bowls, texts/prerecorded messages, posters, leaflets, sermon guides, talking points, radio and television spots. In-depth interviews (24) were conducted with intervention deliverers (community health extension workers, community and religious leaders) and focus group discussions (16) with recipients (parents of children 6-23 months) from 6 rural and urban wards. Participants were purposively sampled; parents were not selected as couples. Eligibility for CHEWs and CRLs included being ≥ 18 years and having participated in intervention implementation. Eligibility for parents included being ≥18 years (or married mothers 15-17 years), having a biological child 6-23 months, and receiving the intervention. Transcripts were coded descriptively in Atlas.ti and the results were mapped to the domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0. For the innovation domain, intervention deliverers and recipients reported high acceptability and appropriateness of the intervention components. For the outer domain, the intervention was perceived to be influenced by values and beliefs (fathers' roles as providers), systemic conditions (economic hardships), and critical incidents (COVID-19). The intervention was also influenced by relational connections, compatibility, intervention deliverers and recipients, teaming, tailoring strategies and engaging for the domains of inner setting, individuals, and implementation process, respectively. For implementation strategies, intervention deliverers liked the training and monthly meetings where they shared experiences and problem solved. The Alive & Thrive intervention in Kaduna State, Nigeria was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for intervention deliverers and recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 10","pages":"e0005214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Alive & Thrive multilevel, multicomponent intervention to engage fathers in complementary feeding in Kaduna State, Nigeria previously showed significant increases in complementary feeding practices for children. This analysis explores the perceptions of intervention deliverers and recipients to inform future spread. The intervention components included counseling cards, home visits, feeding bowls, texts/prerecorded messages, posters, leaflets, sermon guides, talking points, radio and television spots. In-depth interviews (24) were conducted with intervention deliverers (community health extension workers, community and religious leaders) and focus group discussions (16) with recipients (parents of children 6-23 months) from 6 rural and urban wards. Participants were purposively sampled; parents were not selected as couples. Eligibility for CHEWs and CRLs included being ≥ 18 years and having participated in intervention implementation. Eligibility for parents included being ≥18 years (or married mothers 15-17 years), having a biological child 6-23 months, and receiving the intervention. Transcripts were coded descriptively in Atlas.ti and the results were mapped to the domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0. For the innovation domain, intervention deliverers and recipients reported high acceptability and appropriateness of the intervention components. For the outer domain, the intervention was perceived to be influenced by values and beliefs (fathers' roles as providers), systemic conditions (economic hardships), and critical incidents (COVID-19). The intervention was also influenced by relational connections, compatibility, intervention deliverers and recipients, teaming, tailoring strategies and engaging for the domains of inner setting, individuals, and implementation process, respectively. For implementation strategies, intervention deliverers liked the training and monthly meetings where they shared experiences and problem solved. The Alive & Thrive intervention in Kaduna State, Nigeria was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for intervention deliverers and recipients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在尼日利亚北部实施多层次、多成分干预措施,使父亲参与补充喂养:对提供者和接受者的看法。
在尼日利亚卡杜纳州开展的“活着与茁壮成长”多层次、多成分干预措施,旨在让父亲参与补充喂养,此前显示儿童补充喂养做法显著增加。这一分析探讨了干预提供者和接受者的观念,为未来的传播提供信息。干预措施包括辅导卡、家访、喂食碗、文本/预先录制的信息、海报、传单、讲道指南、谈话要点、广播和电视广告。对来自6个农村和城市病房的干预提供者(社区卫生推广工作者、社区和宗教领袖)进行了深入访谈(24次),并与接受者(6-23个月儿童的父母)进行了焦点小组讨论(16次)。参与者是有目的的抽样;父母没有被选为夫妻。CHEWs和CRLs的资格包括年龄≥18岁并参与干预实施。父母年龄≥18岁(或已婚母亲15-17岁),有6-23个月的亲生子女,并接受干预。转录本在Atlas中进行描述性编码。ti和结果被映射到实施研究统一框架2.0的领域和结构。对于创新领域,干预提供者和接受者报告了干预组件的高可接受性和适当性。对于外部领域,干预被认为受到价值观和信仰(父亲作为提供者的角色)、系统条件(经济困难)和关键事件(COVID-19)的影响。在内部环境、个体和实施过程方面,关系联系、兼容性、干预提供者和接受者、团队合作、定制策略和参与也分别对干预产生影响。对于实施策略,干预提供者喜欢培训和每月会议,在那里他们分享经验和解决问题。尼日利亚卡杜纳州的“生存与繁荣”干预措施对于干预提供者和接受者来说是可接受的、适当的和可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信