Do Differences in Skin Pigmentation Affect Detection of Hypoxemia by Pulse Oximetry: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Shannon A Cotton, Jung-Ah Lee, Atul Malhotra, W Cameron McGuire
{"title":"Do Differences in Skin Pigmentation Affect Detection of Hypoxemia by Pulse Oximetry: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Shannon A Cotton, Jung-Ah Lee, Atul Malhotra, W Cameron McGuire","doi":"10.1177/10547738251374746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulse oximetry is a widely used, noninvasive method for estimating arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). However, emerging evidence suggests that skin pigmentation may affect its accuracy, potentially leading to occult hypoxemia in individuals with darker skin tones. This systematic review examines the impact of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy by comparing pulse oximetry (SpO2) readings with arterial blood gas-measured SaO2 across diverse populations. A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies included those comparing SpO2 to SaO2 while stratifying results by skin pigmentation or race/ethnicity. Data extraction focused on bias in SpO2 readings, study design, and population characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Consistent evidence indicated that pulse oximeters overestimate SaO2 in individuals with darker skin tones, particularly at lower oxygen saturations. This overestimation may delay recognition of hypoxemia and critical interventions. Methodological variability was noted, including inconsistent racial classifications and skin tone assessment methods. Pulse oximeters exhibit a systematic bias in individuals with darker skin tones. Standardized skin pigmentation assessment and improved device calibration are needed to enhance accuracy and ensure equitable patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"10547738251374746"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251374746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulse oximetry is a widely used, noninvasive method for estimating arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). However, emerging evidence suggests that skin pigmentation may affect its accuracy, potentially leading to occult hypoxemia in individuals with darker skin tones. This systematic review examines the impact of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy by comparing pulse oximetry (SpO2) readings with arterial blood gas-measured SaO2 across diverse populations. A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies included those comparing SpO2 to SaO2 while stratifying results by skin pigmentation or race/ethnicity. Data extraction focused on bias in SpO2 readings, study design, and population characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Consistent evidence indicated that pulse oximeters overestimate SaO2 in individuals with darker skin tones, particularly at lower oxygen saturations. This overestimation may delay recognition of hypoxemia and critical interventions. Methodological variability was noted, including inconsistent racial classifications and skin tone assessment methods. Pulse oximeters exhibit a systematic bias in individuals with darker skin tones. Standardized skin pigmentation assessment and improved device calibration are needed to enhance accuracy and ensure equitable patient care.

皮肤色素沉着的差异是否影响脉搏血氧仪检测低氧血症:文献系统综述。
脉搏血氧仪是一种广泛应用的无创动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)测定方法。然而,新出现的证据表明,皮肤色素沉着可能会影响其准确性,可能导致深色皮肤的个体隐性低氧血症。本系统综述通过比较不同人群的脉搏血氧仪(SpO2)读数和动脉血气测量的SaO2,研究了皮肤色素沉着对脉搏血氧仪准确性的影响。根据PRISMA 2020指南对PubMed和Embase进行了系统搜索。符合条件的研究包括比较SpO2和SaO2,同时根据皮肤色素沉着或种族/民族对结果进行分层。数据提取侧重于SpO2读数偏差、研究设计和人群特征。使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险。42项研究符合纳入标准。一致的证据表明,脉搏血氧仪高估了肤色较深的人的SaO2,特别是在低氧饱和度下。这种高估可能会延迟低氧血症的识别和关键干预措施。方法上的差异被注意到,包括不一致的种族分类和肤色评估方法。脉搏血氧计在肤色较深的个体中表现出系统性的偏差。需要标准化的皮肤色素沉着评估和改进的设备校准来提高准确性并确保公平的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信