{"title":"Effectiveness of haptic feedback during local and remote robotic surgery: single-blind cadaveric study.","authors":"Hironobu Takano, Yuma Ebihara, Satoshi Hirano, Toshiaki Shichinohe, Soichi Murakami, Hajime Morohashi, Eiji Oki, Kenichi Hakamada, Akinobu Taketomi, Norihiko Ikeda, Masaki Mori","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02826-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic surgery has rapidly evolved, with telesurgery emerging as a promising extension. However, the lack of haptic feedback remains a key limitation, potentially compromising surgical safety. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of haptic feedback on surgical performance in both local and remote robotic settings using a cadaver model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six gastrointestinal surgeons were assigned to local or remote groups and performed standardized bowel traction tasks using the Saroa™ surgical robot. Haptic feedback was tested at three levels: none (0), moderate (0.5), and full (1.0). Each participant completed the task three times under each condition. Task completion time, grip force, and forceps path length were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grip force significantly decreased with increasing haptic feedback levels, particularly in the non-dominant (left) hand. No significant differences in task completion time or forceps path length were found across feedback levels or between local and remote settings, except for a longer right-hand path length in the remote group at feedback level 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Haptic feedback reduced grip force in both local and remote robotic surgery, suggesting enhanced surgical safety. However, its effect on efficiency metrics was limited. These findings support the integration of haptic feedback in telesurgical systems, although further validation with complex procedures and more participants is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02826-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Robotic surgery has rapidly evolved, with telesurgery emerging as a promising extension. However, the lack of haptic feedback remains a key limitation, potentially compromising surgical safety. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of haptic feedback on surgical performance in both local and remote robotic settings using a cadaver model.
Methods: Six gastrointestinal surgeons were assigned to local or remote groups and performed standardized bowel traction tasks using the Saroa™ surgical robot. Haptic feedback was tested at three levels: none (0), moderate (0.5), and full (1.0). Each participant completed the task three times under each condition. Task completion time, grip force, and forceps path length were measured.
Results: Grip force significantly decreased with increasing haptic feedback levels, particularly in the non-dominant (left) hand. No significant differences in task completion time or forceps path length were found across feedback levels or between local and remote settings, except for a longer right-hand path length in the remote group at feedback level 0.5.
Conclusions: Haptic feedback reduced grip force in both local and remote robotic surgery, suggesting enhanced surgical safety. However, its effect on efficiency metrics was limited. These findings support the integration of haptic feedback in telesurgical systems, although further validation with complex procedures and more participants is warranted.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.