Effectiveness of haptic feedback during local and remote robotic surgery: single-blind cadaveric study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hironobu Takano, Yuma Ebihara, Satoshi Hirano, Toshiaki Shichinohe, Soichi Murakami, Hajime Morohashi, Eiji Oki, Kenichi Hakamada, Akinobu Taketomi, Norihiko Ikeda, Masaki Mori
{"title":"Effectiveness of haptic feedback during local and remote robotic surgery: single-blind cadaveric study.","authors":"Hironobu Takano, Yuma Ebihara, Satoshi Hirano, Toshiaki Shichinohe, Soichi Murakami, Hajime Morohashi, Eiji Oki, Kenichi Hakamada, Akinobu Taketomi, Norihiko Ikeda, Masaki Mori","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02826-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic surgery has rapidly evolved, with telesurgery emerging as a promising extension. However, the lack of haptic feedback remains a key limitation, potentially compromising surgical safety. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of haptic feedback on surgical performance in both local and remote robotic settings using a cadaver model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six gastrointestinal surgeons were assigned to local or remote groups and performed standardized bowel traction tasks using the Saroa™ surgical robot. Haptic feedback was tested at three levels: none (0), moderate (0.5), and full (1.0). Each participant completed the task three times under each condition. Task completion time, grip force, and forceps path length were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grip force significantly decreased with increasing haptic feedback levels, particularly in the non-dominant (left) hand. No significant differences in task completion time or forceps path length were found across feedback levels or between local and remote settings, except for a longer right-hand path length in the remote group at feedback level 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Haptic feedback reduced grip force in both local and remote robotic surgery, suggesting enhanced surgical safety. However, its effect on efficiency metrics was limited. These findings support the integration of haptic feedback in telesurgical systems, although further validation with complex procedures and more participants is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02826-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic surgery has rapidly evolved, with telesurgery emerging as a promising extension. However, the lack of haptic feedback remains a key limitation, potentially compromising surgical safety. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of haptic feedback on surgical performance in both local and remote robotic settings using a cadaver model.

Methods: Six gastrointestinal surgeons were assigned to local or remote groups and performed standardized bowel traction tasks using the Saroa™ surgical robot. Haptic feedback was tested at three levels: none (0), moderate (0.5), and full (1.0). Each participant completed the task three times under each condition. Task completion time, grip force, and forceps path length were measured.

Results: Grip force significantly decreased with increasing haptic feedback levels, particularly in the non-dominant (left) hand. No significant differences in task completion time or forceps path length were found across feedback levels or between local and remote settings, except for a longer right-hand path length in the remote group at feedback level 0.5.

Conclusions: Haptic feedback reduced grip force in both local and remote robotic surgery, suggesting enhanced surgical safety. However, its effect on efficiency metrics was limited. These findings support the integration of haptic feedback in telesurgical systems, although further validation with complex procedures and more participants is warranted.

局部和远程机器人手术中触觉反馈的有效性:单盲尸体研究。
背景:机器人手术迅速发展,远程手术成为一个有前途的延伸。然而,缺乏触觉反馈仍然是一个关键的限制,潜在地影响手术安全性。本研究旨在评估触觉反馈对手术性能的影响,在本地和远程机器人设置使用尸体模型。方法:6名胃肠道外科医生被分配到本地或远程组,并使用Saroa™手术机器人执行标准化的肠牵引任务。触觉反馈测试分为三个水平:无(0)、中度(0.5)和完全(1.0)。在每种条件下,每个参与者都完成了三次任务。测量任务完成时间、握力和钳道长度。结果:握力随着触觉反馈水平的增加而显著降低,尤其是在非惯用手(左手)。在任务完成时间或镊子路径长度上,在不同的反馈水平或本地和远程设置之间没有发现显著差异,除了在反馈水平0.5时远程组的右手路径长度更长。结论:触觉反馈降低了机器人在本地和远程手术中的握力,提高了手术安全性。然而,它对效率指标的影响是有限的。这些发现支持触觉反馈在远距外科系统中的整合,尽管需要更复杂的程序和更多的参与者进行进一步的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信