Modified continuous intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia after uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Li-Xiang Zhang, Li Lin, Yuan-Liang Zheng
{"title":"Modified continuous intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia after uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.","authors":"Li-Xiang Zhang, Li Lin, Yuan-Liang Zheng","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03197-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective postoperative pain control is essential for recovery after surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified continuous intercostal nerve block (MCINB) compared to conventional intravenous analgesia pump (IAP) for pain management following uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection at our center between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the actual analgesia method used postoperatively: MCINB and IAP. The MCINB technique involved placing a multi-orifice catheter in the intercostal space under thoracoscopic guidance, with continuous infusion of local anesthetic. We compared postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and during coughing, patient satisfaction with pain management, frequency of rescue analgesic use, analgesic-related side effects, catheter-related complications, length of hospital stay, and total medical costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 458 included patients, 196 received MCINB, and 262 received IAP. Linear mixed-effects model analysis showed that NRS pain scores at rest and during coughing were significantly lower in the MCINB group over the postoperative period (p < 0.001), with post hoc comparisons revealing no significant difference immediately after surgery and on the day of discharge (p > 0.05). At other time points, the median NRS scores in the MCINB group remained within the mild pain range. Patient satisfaction with pain management was significantly higher in the MCINB group than in the IAP group (90.3% vs. 65.6%, p < 0.001). Additionally, the MCINB group had a shorter hospital stay, lower total medical costs, reduced rescue analgesic use, and fewer analgesic-related side effects (p < 0.001). The incidence of intercostal catheter dislodgement and blockage was 1% (2/196) each, with no severe catheter-related complications reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MCINB appears to be a safe and effective option for early postoperative pain management after uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03197-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective postoperative pain control is essential for recovery after surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified continuous intercostal nerve block (MCINB) compared to conventional intravenous analgesia pump (IAP) for pain management following uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection at our center between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the actual analgesia method used postoperatively: MCINB and IAP. The MCINB technique involved placing a multi-orifice catheter in the intercostal space under thoracoscopic guidance, with continuous infusion of local anesthetic. We compared postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and during coughing, patient satisfaction with pain management, frequency of rescue analgesic use, analgesic-related side effects, catheter-related complications, length of hospital stay, and total medical costs.

Results: Among the 458 included patients, 196 received MCINB, and 262 received IAP. Linear mixed-effects model analysis showed that NRS pain scores at rest and during coughing were significantly lower in the MCINB group over the postoperative period (p < 0.001), with post hoc comparisons revealing no significant difference immediately after surgery and on the day of discharge (p > 0.05). At other time points, the median NRS scores in the MCINB group remained within the mild pain range. Patient satisfaction with pain management was significantly higher in the MCINB group than in the IAP group (90.3% vs. 65.6%, p < 0.001). Additionally, the MCINB group had a shorter hospital stay, lower total medical costs, reduced rescue analgesic use, and fewer analgesic-related side effects (p < 0.001). The incidence of intercostal catheter dislodgement and blockage was 1% (2/196) each, with no severe catheter-related complications reported.

Conclusion: MCINB appears to be a safe and effective option for early postoperative pain management after uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改良连续肋间神经阻滞在单门胸腔镜术后镇痛中的应用。
背景:有效的术后疼痛控制对术后恢复至关重要。本研究旨在评估改良的连续肋间神经阻滞(MCINB)与传统静脉镇痛泵(IAP)在单门胸腔镜肺切除术后疼痛管理中的安全性和有效性。方法:我们回顾性分析了2020年1月至2023年12月期间在本中心接受单门胸腔镜肺切除术的患者。根据术后实际使用的镇痛方法将患者分为两组:MCINB和IAP。MCINB技术包括在胸腔镜引导下在肋间隙放置多孔导管,并持续注入局麻药。我们比较了术后数字评定量表(NRS)休息和咳嗽时的疼痛评分、患者对疼痛管理的满意度、镇痛药使用频率、镇痛相关副作用、导管相关并发症、住院时间和总医疗费用。结果:纳入的458例患者中,196例接受MCINB治疗,262例接受IAP治疗。线性混合效应模型分析显示,MCINB组术后休息和咳嗽时NRS疼痛评分显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。在其他时间点,MCINB组的中位NRS评分保持在轻度疼痛范围内。MCINB组患者对疼痛管理的满意度明显高于IAP组(90.3% vs. 65.6%)。结论:MCINB似乎是单门胸腔镜术后早期疼痛管理的安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信