Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: a comparative study of men with prostate volumes ≥ 150 mL and < 150 mL.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mehmet Yilmaz, Halil Cagri Aybal, Irfan Safak Barlas, Mehmet Duvarci, Zeynep Akdagcik, Selcuk Guven, Lutfi Tunc
{"title":"Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: a comparative study of men with prostate volumes ≥ 150 mL and < 150 mL.","authors":"Mehmet Yilmaz, Halil Cagri Aybal, Irfan Safak Barlas, Mehmet Duvarci, Zeynep Akdagcik, Selcuk Guven, Lutfi Tunc","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05985-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) in men with prostate volumes (PV) ≥ 150 mL and to compare them with those with PV < 150 mL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent ThuFLEP between December 2020 and June 2024 for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Patients were categorized into two groups according to prostate volume, with Group 1 including those with PV < 150 mL (n = 355) and Group 2 including those with PV ≥ 150 mL (n = 147). Perioperative and postoperative functional outcomes, as well as complications, were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in functional parameters (International Prostate Symptom Score-IPSS, maximal urinary flow rate-Qmax and postvoid residual urine volume-PVR) compared with baseline values at the 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative IPSS, QoL scores, Qmax, PVR values, and rates of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were comparable between groups at all follow-up intervals (p > 0.05). No patient exhibited postoperative SUI or UUI at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Complication rates were similar between groups, and no Grade ≥ 4 Clavien-Dindo complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ThuFLEP is a safe and effective LEP technique for very large prostates (≥ 150 mL). It yields significant improvements in postoperative functional outcomes with low perioperative complication rates, supporting its use as a minimally invasive alternative for BPO in routine endourology practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05985-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) in men with prostate volumes (PV) ≥ 150 mL and to compare them with those with PV < 150 mL.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent ThuFLEP between December 2020 and June 2024 for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Patients were categorized into two groups according to prostate volume, with Group 1 including those with PV < 150 mL (n = 355) and Group 2 including those with PV ≥ 150 mL (n = 147). Perioperative and postoperative functional outcomes, as well as complications, were evaluated and compared.

Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in functional parameters (International Prostate Symptom Score-IPSS, maximal urinary flow rate-Qmax and postvoid residual urine volume-PVR) compared with baseline values at the 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative IPSS, QoL scores, Qmax, PVR values, and rates of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were comparable between groups at all follow-up intervals (p > 0.05). No patient exhibited postoperative SUI or UUI at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Complication rates were similar between groups, and no Grade ≥ 4 Clavien-Dindo complications occurred.

Conclusion: ThuFLEP is a safe and effective LEP technique for very large prostates (≥ 150 mL). It yields significant improvements in postoperative functional outcomes with low perioperative complication rates, supporting its use as a minimally invasive alternative for BPO in routine endourology practice.

铥纤维激光前列腺摘除(ThuFLEP)治疗良性前列腺梗阻:前列腺体积≥150ml与< 150ml男性的对比研究
目的:我们旨在评估前列腺体积(PV)≥150ml的男性铥光纤激光前列腺去核(ThuFLEP)的结果,并将其与PV方法进行比较。我们回顾性分析了2020年12月至2024年6月期间因良性前列腺阻塞(BPO)而接受ThuFLEP的患者。根据前列腺体积将患者分为两组,第一组包括PV患者。结果:两组患者术后1、6和12个月的功能参数(国际前列腺症状评分- ipss,最大尿流率- qmax和空隙后残留尿量- pvr)均较基线值有显著改善。术后IPSS、QoL评分、Qmax、PVR值、急迫性尿失禁(UUI)和压力性尿失禁(SUI)发生率在所有随访时间间隔内组间具有可比性(p < 0.05)。术后6个月和12个月无患者出现术后SUI或UUI。两组间并发症发生率相似,未发生≥4级Clavien-Dindo并发症。结论:ThuFLEP是一种安全有效的超大型前列腺(≥150ml) LEP技术。它显著改善了术后功能结果,围手术期并发症发生率低,支持其在常规泌尿道外科实践中作为BPO的微创替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信