Jian Huang, Dayong Zhou, Xiao Wang, Yuqi Zeng, Guijun Huo
{"title":"Analysis of the efficacy of drug-coated balloons in the treatment of venous stenosis in hemodialysis access.","authors":"Jian Huang, Dayong Zhou, Xiao Wang, Yuqi Zeng, Guijun Huo","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03182-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and conventional balloon (CB) in the treatment of venous stenosis in hemodialysis access.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The clinical data of 403 hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula stenosis who were admitted to our hospital from November 1, 2020 to January 1, 2024 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into DCB group (n = 163) and CB group (n = 240). The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to evaluate the target lesion primary patency (TLPP) of the two groups. The primary endpoint was the primary patency rate of target lesions 12 months after surgery, and the secondary endpoints were the primary patency rates of target lesions 6 months, 18 months, and 24 months. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to explore the association between DCB and the risk of hemodialysis access dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary patency rate of target lesions in DCB group was higher at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months, and the difference was statistically significant at 6 months (85.0% VS 69.3%, P = 0.0109) and 12 months (64.6% VS 38.0%, 0.0300).There was no significant difference at 18 months (36.9% VS 14.9%, P = 0.1475) and 24 months (23.1% VS 7.5%, P = 0.5091). The median survival time of DCB group was 449 days, and that of CB group was 270 days. The patency time of DCB group was significantly higher than that of CB group (P < 0.0001). After full covariate adjustment, the analysis revealed that patients in DCB group (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.70) had a significantly lower risk of hemodialysis access dysfunction compared to those in CB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results show that compared with CB, DCB can obviously improve the primary patency rate of target lesions with vascular access stenosis in hemodialysis and reduce the re-intervention of target lesions, which is an effective and safe treatment for hemodialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03182-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and conventional balloon (CB) in the treatment of venous stenosis in hemodialysis access.
Method: The clinical data of 403 hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula stenosis who were admitted to our hospital from November 1, 2020 to January 1, 2024 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into DCB group (n = 163) and CB group (n = 240). The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to evaluate the target lesion primary patency (TLPP) of the two groups. The primary endpoint was the primary patency rate of target lesions 12 months after surgery, and the secondary endpoints were the primary patency rates of target lesions 6 months, 18 months, and 24 months. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to explore the association between DCB and the risk of hemodialysis access dysfunction.
Results: The primary patency rate of target lesions in DCB group was higher at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months, and the difference was statistically significant at 6 months (85.0% VS 69.3%, P = 0.0109) and 12 months (64.6% VS 38.0%, 0.0300).There was no significant difference at 18 months (36.9% VS 14.9%, P = 0.1475) and 24 months (23.1% VS 7.5%, P = 0.5091). The median survival time of DCB group was 449 days, and that of CB group was 270 days. The patency time of DCB group was significantly higher than that of CB group (P < 0.0001). After full covariate adjustment, the analysis revealed that patients in DCB group (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.70) had a significantly lower risk of hemodialysis access dysfunction compared to those in CB group.
Conclusion: The results show that compared with CB, DCB can obviously improve the primary patency rate of target lesions with vascular access stenosis in hemodialysis and reduce the re-intervention of target lesions, which is an effective and safe treatment for hemodialysis patients.
目的:评价药物包被球囊(DCB)与常规球囊(CB)治疗血液透析通路静脉狭窄的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析我院2020年11月1日至2024年1月1日收治的403例动静脉瘘狭窄血液透析患者的临床资料,分为DCB组(163例)和CB组(240例)。Kaplan-Meier曲线评价两组靶灶原发性通畅程度(TLPP)。主要终点为术后12个月目标病灶的原发性通畅率,次要终点为术后6个月、18个月和24个月目标病灶的原发性通畅率。采用Cox比例风险模型探讨DCB与血液透析通路功能障碍风险之间的关系。结果:DCB组在6个月、12个月、18个月、24个月时目标病灶的原发性通畅率较高,6个月(85.0% VS 69.3%, P = 0.0109)、12个月(64.6% VS 38.0%, P = 0.0300)时差异有统计学意义。18个月(36.9% VS 14.9%, P = 0.1475)和24个月(23.1% VS 7.5%, P = 0.5091)无显著差异。DCB组的中位生存时间为449天,CB组的中位生存时间为270天。结论:与CB相比,DCB可明显提高血液透析中血管通路狭窄的靶病变的一次通畅率,减少靶病变的再干预,是一种有效、安全的治疗血液透析患者的方法。