Achieving and Sustaining Standardized Measurement of Treatment Outcomes in Children With Cleft Lip/Palate: Pilot Study of a Multifaced Implementation Strategy.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Thomas J Sitzman, Jessica L Chee-Williams, Davinder J Singh, Kelly Nett Cordero, Patricia Beals, Maria T Britto
{"title":"Achieving and Sustaining Standardized Measurement of Treatment Outcomes in Children With Cleft Lip/Palate: Pilot Study of a Multifaced Implementation Strategy.","authors":"Thomas J Sitzman, Jessica L Chee-Williams, Davinder J Singh, Kelly Nett Cordero, Patricia Beals, Maria T Britto","doi":"10.1177/10556656251382528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivePrior work has identified numerous barriers to standardized outcome measurement in cleft care. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy to collect standardized outcomes for children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).DesignA one-armed, single-site pilot study of a multifaceted implementation strategy.SettingA metropolitan children's hospital.PatientsFive-year-old children with CL/P.InterventionsA multifaceted implementation strategy for standardized outcome measurement.Main Outcomes MeasuresThe primary outcome measure was penetration of the intervention, defined as the proportion of children for whom the standardized measures of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes were collected. Penetration pre-implementation and 12 months post-implementation were compared. The secondary outcome was acceptability of standardized outcome measurement among providers and staff, evaluated with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure.ResultsThe implementation strategy resulted in high penetration of standardized outcome measurement: measurement of aesthetic outcomes increased from 7% to 82% (<i>p</i> < .0001); measurement of dental outcomes increased from 0% to 56% (<i>p</i> < .0001); measurement of speech outcomes increased from 29% to 77% (<i>p</i> = .0001). Acceptability of standardized outcome measurement was high, with 93% of cleft team providers and staff (n = 14/15) reporting that they somewhat or completely agreed that standardized outcome measurement met their approval, was appealing, was welcomed, and was liked. Penetration continued to improve after the implementation period, with high rates of outcome measure collection sustained for four years following implementation.ConclusionsDeployment of a multifaceted implementation strategy led to substantial increases in the collection of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes among children with CL/P.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251382528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251382528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivePrior work has identified numerous barriers to standardized outcome measurement in cleft care. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy to collect standardized outcomes for children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).DesignA one-armed, single-site pilot study of a multifaceted implementation strategy.SettingA metropolitan children's hospital.PatientsFive-year-old children with CL/P.InterventionsA multifaceted implementation strategy for standardized outcome measurement.Main Outcomes MeasuresThe primary outcome measure was penetration of the intervention, defined as the proportion of children for whom the standardized measures of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes were collected. Penetration pre-implementation and 12 months post-implementation were compared. The secondary outcome was acceptability of standardized outcome measurement among providers and staff, evaluated with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure.ResultsThe implementation strategy resulted in high penetration of standardized outcome measurement: measurement of aesthetic outcomes increased from 7% to 82% (p < .0001); measurement of dental outcomes increased from 0% to 56% (p < .0001); measurement of speech outcomes increased from 29% to 77% (p = .0001). Acceptability of standardized outcome measurement was high, with 93% of cleft team providers and staff (n = 14/15) reporting that they somewhat or completely agreed that standardized outcome measurement met their approval, was appealing, was welcomed, and was liked. Penetration continued to improve after the implementation period, with high rates of outcome measure collection sustained for four years following implementation.ConclusionsDeployment of a multifaceted implementation strategy led to substantial increases in the collection of aesthetic, dental, and speech outcomes among children with CL/P.

实现和维持唇腭裂儿童治疗结果的标准化测量:一项多方面实施策略的试点研究。
目的先前的工作已经确定了许多障碍,以标准化的结果测量唇腭裂护理。本研究的目的是评估一种多方面的实施策略,以收集唇腭裂儿童(CL/P)的标准化结果。设计一项单臂、单地点的多方面实施策略的试点研究。城市儿童医院。5岁儿童CL/P。干预措施标准化结果测量的多方面实施策略。主要结局指标主要结局指标是干预的渗透,定义为收集美学、牙科和语言结果的标准化措施的儿童比例。对实施前和实施后12个月的渗透率进行比较。次要结果是提供者和工作人员对标准化结果测量的可接受性,用干预措施的可接受性进行评估。结果实施策略导致标准化结果测量的高渗透率:美学结果的测量从7%增加到82% (p p p = 0.0001)。标准化结果测量的可接受性很高,93%的裂隙团队提供者和员工(n = 14/15)报告说,他们多少或完全同意标准化结果测量符合他们的认可,是有吸引力的,是受欢迎的,是喜欢的。在实施后,普及率继续提高,在实施后的四年中,成果衡量指标的高收集率持续保持。结论多层面的实施策略的部署导致CL/P儿童的美学,牙科和语言结果的收集大幅增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信