Construction of a postoperative home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program protocol for lung cancer patients delivered using the internet: A Delphi-based study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Haoyu Zou, Jiani Qu, Yanqing Li, Feilin Wang, Pan Chen, Liuyi Zhang, Honghui Zhang
{"title":"Construction of a postoperative home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program protocol for lung cancer patients delivered using the internet: A Delphi-based study.","authors":"Haoyu Zou, Jiani Qu, Yanqing Li, Feilin Wang, Pan Chen, Liuyi Zhang, Honghui Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09916-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To construct a protocol to guide standardized home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for postoperative lung cancer patients based on the Internet + .</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A postoperative home-based pulmonary rehabilitation protocol via the Internet (PHPRPI) for patients with lung cancer was developed through a literature review. The protocol was modified based on the opinions and suggestions of experts in two rounds of expert consultation, utilizing the Delphi method. A three-level, hierarchical structure was employed in the Delphi method, with primary indicators representing broad, overarching concepts, secondary indicators providing more specific details within those concepts, and tertiary indicators offering the most granular and actionable measures. The following coefficients were calculated to assess the robustness of the Delphi method: the positive coefficient was calculated as the percentage of experts completing the questionnaire, with a recommended level of ≥ 70%. The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was calculated as the arithmetic mean of familiarity criteria (Ca) and the degree of familiarity (Cs), with a recommended level of ≥ 0.70. The coefficient of variation (CV) and Kendall's harmony coefficient (ω) were used to indicate the degree of variation and coordination, which range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more consistent expert opinions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen experts completed two rounds of consultation, with the Cr being 0.91, the ω being 0.159 (P < 0.01), and the CV ranging from 0.0477 to 0.1352, indicating good reliability of the Delphi method. The final protocol includes four primary indicators (including composition of the staff, establishment of patient health records, off-line intervention, and online intervention), 14 secondary indicators (e.g., personnel professional, specialized assessment, training frequency, and breathing training methods), and 44 tertiary indicators (e.g., vital sign assessment, content of health education, resistance training, and flexibility training).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PHPRPI provides preliminary evidence to guide postoperative home-based rehabilitation management for lung cancer patients, aiming to improve their health outcomes and well-being. Future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to further validate the safety and effectiveness of this model and assess whether it is acceptable to patients and healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 10","pages":"905"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09916-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To construct a protocol to guide standardized home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for postoperative lung cancer patients based on the Internet + .

Methods: A postoperative home-based pulmonary rehabilitation protocol via the Internet (PHPRPI) for patients with lung cancer was developed through a literature review. The protocol was modified based on the opinions and suggestions of experts in two rounds of expert consultation, utilizing the Delphi method. A three-level, hierarchical structure was employed in the Delphi method, with primary indicators representing broad, overarching concepts, secondary indicators providing more specific details within those concepts, and tertiary indicators offering the most granular and actionable measures. The following coefficients were calculated to assess the robustness of the Delphi method: the positive coefficient was calculated as the percentage of experts completing the questionnaire, with a recommended level of ≥ 70%. The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was calculated as the arithmetic mean of familiarity criteria (Ca) and the degree of familiarity (Cs), with a recommended level of ≥ 0.70. The coefficient of variation (CV) and Kendall's harmony coefficient (ω) were used to indicate the degree of variation and coordination, which range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more consistent expert opinions.

Results: Eighteen experts completed two rounds of consultation, with the Cr being 0.91, the ω being 0.159 (P < 0.01), and the CV ranging from 0.0477 to 0.1352, indicating good reliability of the Delphi method. The final protocol includes four primary indicators (including composition of the staff, establishment of patient health records, off-line intervention, and online intervention), 14 secondary indicators (e.g., personnel professional, specialized assessment, training frequency, and breathing training methods), and 44 tertiary indicators (e.g., vital sign assessment, content of health education, resistance training, and flexibility training).

Conclusion: The PHPRPI provides preliminary evidence to guide postoperative home-based rehabilitation management for lung cancer patients, aiming to improve their health outcomes and well-being. Future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to further validate the safety and effectiveness of this model and assess whether it is acceptable to patients and healthcare providers.

基于delphi的研究:基于互联网的肺癌患者术后家庭肺康复方案的构建
目的:构建基于互联网+的肺癌术后规范化家庭肺康复指导方案。方法:通过文献回顾,制定肺癌患者术后家庭网络肺康复方案(PHPRPI)。采用德尔菲法,根据两轮专家咨询专家的意见和建议对方案进行修改。德尔菲法采用三级层次结构,一级指标代表广泛的总体概念,二级指标提供这些概念中更具体的细节,三级指标提供最细化和可操作的措施。计算以下系数来评估德尔菲法的稳健性:正系数以专家完成问卷的百分比计算,建议水平≥70%。专家权威系数(Cr)采用熟悉度标准(Ca)与熟悉度(Cs)的算术平均值计算,推荐水平≥0.70。变异系数(CV)和肯德尔和谐系数(ω)表示专家意见的变异程度和协调程度,其取值范围为0 ~ 1,值越大表明专家意见越一致。结果:18位专家完成2轮会诊,Cr为0.91,ω为0.159 (P)。结论:PHPRPI为指导肺癌患者术后居家康复管理提供初步依据,旨在改善患者的健康结局和幸福感。未来的随机对照试验(rct)需要进一步验证该模型的安全性和有效性,并评估患者和医疗保健提供者是否可以接受该模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信