Development and Initial Validation of the Cannabis Attention and Affect Motives Scale.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Danielle S Lowden, Jennifer H K Wong, Seth C Harty
{"title":"Development and Initial Validation of the Cannabis Attention and Affect Motives Scale.","authors":"Danielle S Lowden, Jennifer H K Wong, Seth C Harty","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2025.2565420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cannabis use is a globally prevalent, though potentially harmful, behavior whereby varying patterns of use manifest from a range of motivating factors. Individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are often overrepresented in cannabis use statistics, with some users anecdotally reporting that cannabis improves ADHD symptoms. Current motive scales do not fully capture the breadth of cognitions, specifically perceived improvement in attention, necessary to capture the range of cannabis use motivations within this population. This study developed the Cannabis Attention and Affect Motives Scale (CAAMS) to assess cannabis use in response to various situations and affective states.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adult cannabis users (<i>n</i> = 417, 61.9% male, predominantly NZ/Other European) completed an online survey detailing their motives and expectancies of cannabis use as well as an ADHD risk screener.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the hypothesized 46-item, 3-factor model was not an appropriate fit, a split-half sample EFA and CFA yielded a refined, theoretically and psychometrically sound, 28-item, 5-factor model. Post-hoc between-groups comparisons on those having low, medium, or high risk of ADHD showed significant differences for CAAMS factors: Negative Affect Reduction, Attention Enhancement, Attention and Behavior Motivation, and Social Anxiety Reduction, but not for Recreation and Relaxation Enhancement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAAMS is psychometrically valid, measuring five separate motives of cannabis use pertaining to cognitive enhancement. An initial analysis of these motives as a function of ADHD risk highlights the potential of this scale to understand the cognitive pathways leading to cannabis use in individuals with attentional difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2565420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cannabis use is a globally prevalent, though potentially harmful, behavior whereby varying patterns of use manifest from a range of motivating factors. Individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are often overrepresented in cannabis use statistics, with some users anecdotally reporting that cannabis improves ADHD symptoms. Current motive scales do not fully capture the breadth of cognitions, specifically perceived improvement in attention, necessary to capture the range of cannabis use motivations within this population. This study developed the Cannabis Attention and Affect Motives Scale (CAAMS) to assess cannabis use in response to various situations and affective states.

Method: Adult cannabis users (n = 417, 61.9% male, predominantly NZ/Other European) completed an online survey detailing their motives and expectancies of cannabis use as well as an ADHD risk screener.

Results: While the hypothesized 46-item, 3-factor model was not an appropriate fit, a split-half sample EFA and CFA yielded a refined, theoretically and psychometrically sound, 28-item, 5-factor model. Post-hoc between-groups comparisons on those having low, medium, or high risk of ADHD showed significant differences for CAAMS factors: Negative Affect Reduction, Attention Enhancement, Attention and Behavior Motivation, and Social Anxiety Reduction, but not for Recreation and Relaxation Enhancement.

Conclusions: The CAAMS is psychometrically valid, measuring five separate motives of cannabis use pertaining to cognitive enhancement. An initial analysis of these motives as a function of ADHD risk highlights the potential of this scale to understand the cognitive pathways leading to cannabis use in individuals with attentional difficulties.

大麻注意和影响动机量表的开发和初步验证。
目的:大麻使用是一种全球普遍存在的行为,尽管有潜在的危害,其中不同的使用模式表现为一系列激励因素。在大麻使用统计数据中,被诊断患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的个体的比例往往过高,一些使用者报告说,大麻改善了注意力缺陷/多动障碍症状。目前的动机量表并没有完全捕捉到认知的广度,特别是感知到的注意力的改善,这是捕捉这一人群中大麻使用动机范围所必需的。本研究开发了大麻注意和影响动机量表(CAAMS)来评估大麻使用对各种情况和情感状态的反应。方法:成年大麻使用者(n = 417, 61.9%为男性,主要是新西兰/其他欧洲人)完成了一项在线调查,详细说明了他们使用大麻的动机和预期,以及ADHD风险筛查。结果:虽然假设的46项3因素模型并不合适,但劈开一半样本的EFA和CFA产生了一个精炼的,理论上和心理计量学上健全的28项5因素模型。对低、中、高风险ADHD患者进行的事后组间比较显示,在消极影响减少、注意力增强、注意力和行为动机、社交焦虑减少等CAAMS因素上存在显著差异,但在娱乐和放松增强方面没有显著差异。结论:CAAMS在心理测量学上是有效的,测量了与认知增强有关的大麻使用的五个独立动机。对这些动机作为ADHD风险功能的初步分析强调了这种量表的潜力,以了解导致注意力困难个体使用大麻的认知途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信