{"title":"Decoding redox pathways in plants: Structural and functional comparison of peroxiredoxins and glutathione peroxidases","authors":"Thomaz Stumpf Trenz, Marcia Margis-Pinheiro","doi":"10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plants face constant environmental challenges that lead to fluctuations in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Among these, hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) stands out as a stable and diffusible signaling molecule that modulates the redox state of key proteins. To prevent oxidative damage while maintaining signaling functions, plants rely on thiol peroxidases (TPXs), particularly glutathione peroxidase-like proteins (GPXLs) and peroxiredoxins (PRXs). Both enzyme families catalyze peroxide reduction and share thiol-based redox mechanisms, seemingly converging on similar functions. This review highlights both the convergence and, more importantly, the divergence between GPXLs and PRXs in plants, including their evolutionary histories, domain architectures, and substrate and reductant specificities. While 2-Cys PRXs are well-established redox sensors capable of relaying oxidative signals to target proteins or via thioredoxin networks, relatively few examples have confirmed that GPXLs can also oxidize specific target proteins, positioning them as potential redox signal transducers. We explore documented cases of GPXL- and PRX-mediated redox signaling in stress responses and emphasize the need for further investigation into TPX interactomes and posttranslational modifications. Unraveling the distinct and overlapping functions of PRXs and GPXLs will provide deeper insight into how plants fine-tune redox signals to cope with environmental stress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20234,"journal":{"name":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 110580"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0981942825011088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plants face constant environmental challenges that lead to fluctuations in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Among these, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) stands out as a stable and diffusible signaling molecule that modulates the redox state of key proteins. To prevent oxidative damage while maintaining signaling functions, plants rely on thiol peroxidases (TPXs), particularly glutathione peroxidase-like proteins (GPXLs) and peroxiredoxins (PRXs). Both enzyme families catalyze peroxide reduction and share thiol-based redox mechanisms, seemingly converging on similar functions. This review highlights both the convergence and, more importantly, the divergence between GPXLs and PRXs in plants, including their evolutionary histories, domain architectures, and substrate and reductant specificities. While 2-Cys PRXs are well-established redox sensors capable of relaying oxidative signals to target proteins or via thioredoxin networks, relatively few examples have confirmed that GPXLs can also oxidize specific target proteins, positioning them as potential redox signal transducers. We explore documented cases of GPXL- and PRX-mediated redox signaling in stress responses and emphasize the need for further investigation into TPX interactomes and posttranslational modifications. Unraveling the distinct and overlapping functions of PRXs and GPXLs will provide deeper insight into how plants fine-tune redox signals to cope with environmental stress.
期刊介绍:
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes original theoretical, experimental and technical contributions in the various fields of plant physiology (biochemistry, physiology, structure, genetics, plant-microbe interactions, etc.) at diverse levels of integration (molecular, subcellular, cellular, organ, whole plant, environmental). Opinions expressed in the journal are the sole responsibility of the authors and publication does not imply the editors'' agreement.
Manuscripts describing molecular-genetic and/or gene expression data that are not integrated with biochemical analysis and/or actual measurements of plant physiological processes are not suitable for PPB. Also "Omics" studies (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) reporting descriptive analysis without an element of functional validation assays, will not be considered. Similarly, applied agronomic or phytochemical studies that generate no new, fundamental insights in plant physiological and/or biochemical processes are not suitable for publication in PPB.
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes several types of articles: Reviews, Papers and Short Papers. Articles for Reviews are either invited by the editor or proposed by the authors for the editor''s prior agreement. Reviews should not exceed 40 typewritten pages and Short Papers no more than approximately 8 typewritten pages. The fundamental character of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry remains that of a journal for original results.